{"title":"面对OCR影响力的减弱,法院可能维持基本变更决定","authors":"Michael R. Masinter Esq.","doi":"10.1002/dhe.31978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Should the dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights continue, students who can retain private or pro bono counsel may resort to litigation rather than OCR complaints to contest the denial of academic accommodations. The recent Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Albert v. Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists, LLC may foreshadow a more liberal approach to upholding fundamental alteration determinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":100378,"journal":{"name":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","volume":"30 11","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Courts may uphold fundamental alteration determinations in face of waning OCR influence\",\"authors\":\"Michael R. Masinter Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dhe.31978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Should the dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights continue, students who can retain private or pro bono counsel may resort to litigation rather than OCR complaints to contest the denial of academic accommodations. The recent Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Albert v. Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists, LLC may foreshadow a more liberal approach to upholding fundamental alteration determinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability Compliance for Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"30 11\",\"pages\":\"3-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability Compliance for Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Courts may uphold fundamental alteration determinations in face of waning OCR influence
Should the dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights continue, students who can retain private or pro bono counsel may resort to litigation rather than OCR complaints to contest the denial of academic accommodations. The recent Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Albert v. Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists, LLC may foreshadow a more liberal approach to upholding fundamental alteration determinations.