{"title":"共和党总检察长澄清了对504条款的法律挑战的立场","authors":"Eric Lyerly Esq.","doi":"10.1002/dhe.31977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Last September, 17 Republican state attorneys general sued the Biden administration over its decision to update Section 504 to potentially include protections for gender dysphoria. Parts of the lawsuit went as far as requesting that the entirety of Section 504 be found unconstitutional, prompting widespread concern among disability rights groups and advocates. The lawsuit also challenges other aspects of Section 504 under the Spending Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution.</p>","PeriodicalId":100378,"journal":{"name":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","volume":"30 11","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Republican AGs clarify stance on legal challenge to Section 504\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lyerly Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dhe.31977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Last September, 17 Republican state attorneys general sued the Biden administration over its decision to update Section 504 to potentially include protections for gender dysphoria. Parts of the lawsuit went as far as requesting that the entirety of Section 504 be found unconstitutional, prompting widespread concern among disability rights groups and advocates. The lawsuit also challenges other aspects of Section 504 under the Spending Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability Compliance for Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"30 11\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability Compliance for Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Republican AGs clarify stance on legal challenge to Section 504
Last September, 17 Republican state attorneys general sued the Biden administration over its decision to update Section 504 to potentially include protections for gender dysphoria. Parts of the lawsuit went as far as requesting that the entirety of Section 504 be found unconstitutional, prompting widespread concern among disability rights groups and advocates. The lawsuit also challenges other aspects of Section 504 under the Spending Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
