美国临床药学服务经济评价系统综述:2018-2022

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bertha De Los Santos Pharm.D., M.S., Michael Kim Pharm.D., Abdullah Alsharif Pharm.D., Ahmed Gharib, Jessica Kim, Benson Binu B.S., Daniel Touchette Pharm.D., M.A., FCCP, Alexandra Perez Pharm.D., M.S.
{"title":"美国临床药学服务经济评价系统综述:2018-2022","authors":"Bertha De Los Santos Pharm.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Michael Kim Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Abdullah Alsharif Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ahmed Gharib,&nbsp;Jessica Kim,&nbsp;Benson Binu B.S.,&nbsp;Daniel Touchette Pharm.D., M.A., FCCP,&nbsp;Alexandra Perez Pharm.D., M.S.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating the economic impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) is important for program implementation and sustainability. This study systematically reviewed economic evaluations of United States-based CPS published between 2018 and 2022. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, IPA, and CINAHL in September 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed pharmacist-based CPS reporting economic outcomes or program costs. Studies where the pharmacist's individual economic impact could not be isolated were excluded. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed based on study design and the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument for full economic evaluations. Descriptive statistics summarized study characteristics. (PROSPERO #CRD42023449047). A total of 103 articles met inclusion criteria. Of these, 35% were disease state management, 28% general pharmacotherapy monitoring, and 27% targeted drug programs. Intervention settings included 35% hospital sites, 28% ambulatory care, and 9% community pharmacies. Telehealth delivery was reported in 36% of the studies, while 16% focused on outcomes related to reimbursement or return on investment. Economic evaluation types included descriptive (53%), partial evaluations (30%), and full economic evaluations (17%). According to the American College of Clinical Pharmacy process of care components, 57% included patient assessment, medication therapy evaluation, care plan development and implementation, and follow-up evaluation. The median and interquartile range (IQR) QHES score for the full evaluations was 68 (46–82) out of 100. This review highlights the need for improved methodological rigor and comprehensive economic evaluations to support the long-term viability and reimbursement of CPS, particularly among services delivered via telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"8 5","pages":"385-397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy Services in the United States: 2018–2022\",\"authors\":\"Bertha De Los Santos Pharm.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Michael Kim Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Abdullah Alsharif Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ahmed Gharib,&nbsp;Jessica Kim,&nbsp;Benson Binu B.S.,&nbsp;Daniel Touchette Pharm.D., M.A., FCCP,&nbsp;Alexandra Perez Pharm.D., M.S.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jac5.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Evaluating the economic impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) is important for program implementation and sustainability. This study systematically reviewed economic evaluations of United States-based CPS published between 2018 and 2022. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, IPA, and CINAHL in September 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed pharmacist-based CPS reporting economic outcomes or program costs. Studies where the pharmacist's individual economic impact could not be isolated were excluded. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed based on study design and the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument for full economic evaluations. Descriptive statistics summarized study characteristics. (PROSPERO #CRD42023449047). A total of 103 articles met inclusion criteria. Of these, 35% were disease state management, 28% general pharmacotherapy monitoring, and 27% targeted drug programs. Intervention settings included 35% hospital sites, 28% ambulatory care, and 9% community pharmacies. Telehealth delivery was reported in 36% of the studies, while 16% focused on outcomes related to reimbursement or return on investment. Economic evaluation types included descriptive (53%), partial evaluations (30%), and full economic evaluations (17%). According to the American College of Clinical Pharmacy process of care components, 57% included patient assessment, medication therapy evaluation, care plan development and implementation, and follow-up evaluation. The median and interquartile range (IQR) QHES score for the full evaluations was 68 (46–82) out of 100. This review highlights the need for improved methodological rigor and comprehensive economic evaluations to support the long-term viability and reimbursement of CPS, particularly among services delivered via telehealth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"385-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.70034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.70034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估临床药学服务(CPS)的经济影响对项目实施和可持续性很重要。本研究系统地回顾了2018年至2022年间发表的美国CPS的经济评估。我们于2023年9月对PubMed、EMBASE、IPA和CINAHL进行了系统检索。纳入标准包括以药剂师为基础的CPS报告经济成果或项目成本。排除了药剂师个人经济影响不能被孤立的研究。根据研究设计和卫生经济研究质量(QHES)工具进行全面的经济评估,评估研究质量和偏倚风险。描述性统计总结了研究的特点。(普洛斯彼罗# CRD42023449047)。共有103篇文章符合纳入标准。其中,35%是疾病状态管理,28%是一般药物治疗监测,27%是靶向药物项目。干预环境包括35%的医院、28%的门诊护理和9%的社区药房。36%的研究报告了远程保健服务,而16%的研究侧重于与报销或投资回报有关的结果。经济评价类型包括描述性评价(53%)、部分评价(30%)和全面经济评价(17%)。根据美国临床药学学院的流程护理组成部分,57%包括患者评估、药物治疗评估、护理计划制定和实施以及随访评估。完整评估的QHES评分中位数和四分位数范围(IQR)为68分(46-82分)(满分100分)。这项审查强调需要改进方法的严谨性和全面的经济评价,以支持CPS的长期可行性和报销,特别是在通过远程保健提供的服务中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy Services in the United States: 2018–2022

Evaluating the economic impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) is important for program implementation and sustainability. This study systematically reviewed economic evaluations of United States-based CPS published between 2018 and 2022. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, IPA, and CINAHL in September 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed pharmacist-based CPS reporting economic outcomes or program costs. Studies where the pharmacist's individual economic impact could not be isolated were excluded. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed based on study design and the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument for full economic evaluations. Descriptive statistics summarized study characteristics. (PROSPERO #CRD42023449047). A total of 103 articles met inclusion criteria. Of these, 35% were disease state management, 28% general pharmacotherapy monitoring, and 27% targeted drug programs. Intervention settings included 35% hospital sites, 28% ambulatory care, and 9% community pharmacies. Telehealth delivery was reported in 36% of the studies, while 16% focused on outcomes related to reimbursement or return on investment. Economic evaluation types included descriptive (53%), partial evaluations (30%), and full economic evaluations (17%). According to the American College of Clinical Pharmacy process of care components, 57% included patient assessment, medication therapy evaluation, care plan development and implementation, and follow-up evaluation. The median and interquartile range (IQR) QHES score for the full evaluations was 68 (46–82) out of 100. This review highlights the need for improved methodological rigor and comprehensive economic evaluations to support the long-term viability and reimbursement of CPS, particularly among services delivered via telehealth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信