手持式和便携式红外光谱仪快速测定面团中昆虫脂类及其脂肪酸谱

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Carmen Mendez-Sanchez, Madushika K. Ranasinghe, Carme Güell, Montserrat Ferrando, Luis Rodriguez-Saona, Silvia de Lamo Castellvi
{"title":"手持式和便携式红外光谱仪快速测定面团中昆虫脂类及其脂肪酸谱","authors":"Carmen Mendez-Sanchez,&nbsp;Madushika K. Ranasinghe,&nbsp;Carme Güell,&nbsp;Montserrat Ferrando,&nbsp;Luis Rodriguez-Saona,&nbsp;Silvia de Lamo Castellvi","doi":"10.1007/s11947-025-03772-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of the study was to evaluate infrared (IR) spectroscopy in combination with pattern recognition analysis as a rapid technique to quantify the percentage of insect lipid added into the chickpea-based dough as well as the dough’s fatty acid profile. Several chickpea-based doughs were prepared with a variable amount of <i>Tenebrio molitor</i>, <i>Alphitobius diaperinus</i>, and <i>Acheta domesticus</i> lipid fraction (0, 2.9%, 5.8%, 8.7%, and 11.6%) replacing the same amount of olive and sunflower oil. The raw dough was analyzed using portable Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) and handheld FT near (FT-NIR) spectrometers. The fatty acid profile was determined by using fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) methods. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) with cross-validation (leave-one-out) was used to build up a model to predict the percentage of insect lipid added showing a low standard error of cross-validation (SE<sub>CV</sub> ≤ 0.71%), strong correlation (<i>R</i><sub>CV</sub> ≥ 0.85), and great predictive ability (RPD, 5.21–5.53) with the external validation set. The saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids as well as the content of palmitic, oleic, and linoleic were correctly predicted with values of SE<sub>CV</sub> ≤ 5.64% and an <i>R</i><sub>CV</sub> ≥ 0.88. Nonetheless, the FT-MIR device tested showed higher performance to predict SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and fatty acids reaching values of 0.97 in coefficient of correlation (<i>R</i><sub>P</sub>) and 2.81% in standard error in prediction (SE<sub>P</sub>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":562,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","volume":"18 6","pages":"5303 - 5317"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11947-025-03772-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid Determination of Insect Lipids and Their Fatty Acid Profile in Dough Using Handheld and Portable Infrared Spectrometers\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Mendez-Sanchez,&nbsp;Madushika K. Ranasinghe,&nbsp;Carme Güell,&nbsp;Montserrat Ferrando,&nbsp;Luis Rodriguez-Saona,&nbsp;Silvia de Lamo Castellvi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11947-025-03772-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of the study was to evaluate infrared (IR) spectroscopy in combination with pattern recognition analysis as a rapid technique to quantify the percentage of insect lipid added into the chickpea-based dough as well as the dough’s fatty acid profile. Several chickpea-based doughs were prepared with a variable amount of <i>Tenebrio molitor</i>, <i>Alphitobius diaperinus</i>, and <i>Acheta domesticus</i> lipid fraction (0, 2.9%, 5.8%, 8.7%, and 11.6%) replacing the same amount of olive and sunflower oil. The raw dough was analyzed using portable Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) and handheld FT near (FT-NIR) spectrometers. The fatty acid profile was determined by using fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) methods. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) with cross-validation (leave-one-out) was used to build up a model to predict the percentage of insect lipid added showing a low standard error of cross-validation (SE<sub>CV</sub> ≤ 0.71%), strong correlation (<i>R</i><sub>CV</sub> ≥ 0.85), and great predictive ability (RPD, 5.21–5.53) with the external validation set. The saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids as well as the content of palmitic, oleic, and linoleic were correctly predicted with values of SE<sub>CV</sub> ≤ 5.64% and an <i>R</i><sub>CV</sub> ≥ 0.88. Nonetheless, the FT-MIR device tested showed higher performance to predict SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and fatty acids reaching values of 0.97 in coefficient of correlation (<i>R</i><sub>P</sub>) and 2.81% in standard error in prediction (SE<sub>P</sub>).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioprocess Technology\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"5303 - 5317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11947-025-03772-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioprocess Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-025-03772-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-025-03772-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的目的是评价红外(IR)光谱结合模式识别分析作为一种快速技术来量化添加到鹰嘴豆面团中的昆虫脂的百分比以及面团的脂肪酸谱。用不同含量的黄粉拟黄虫(tenbrio molitor)、粗甲拟黄虫(Alphitobius diaperinus)和家羊藿(Acheta domesticus)脂质部分(分别为0、2.9%、5.8%、8.7%和11.6%)代替相同含量的橄榄油和葵花籽油制备鹰嘴豆基面团。采用便携式傅里叶变换中红外光谱仪(FT- mir)和手持式傅里叶变换近红外光谱仪(FT- nir)对生面团进行了分析。采用脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)法测定脂肪酸谱。采用交叉验证的偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)(留一)建立昆虫脂添加率预测模型,与外部验证集交叉验证标准误差低(SECV≤0.71%),相关性强(RCV≥0.85),预测能力强(RPD为5.21 ~ 5.53)。饱和脂肪酸(SFA)、单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)和多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)以及棕榈酸、油酸和亚油酸的含量预测正确,SECV值≤5.64%,RCV≥0.88。尽管如此,FT-MIR装置在预测SFA、MUFA、PUFA和脂肪酸方面表现出更高的性能,相关系数(RP)达到0.97,预测标准误差(SEP)达到2.81%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid Determination of Insect Lipids and Their Fatty Acid Profile in Dough Using Handheld and Portable Infrared Spectrometers

The objective of the study was to evaluate infrared (IR) spectroscopy in combination with pattern recognition analysis as a rapid technique to quantify the percentage of insect lipid added into the chickpea-based dough as well as the dough’s fatty acid profile. Several chickpea-based doughs were prepared with a variable amount of Tenebrio molitor, Alphitobius diaperinus, and Acheta domesticus lipid fraction (0, 2.9%, 5.8%, 8.7%, and 11.6%) replacing the same amount of olive and sunflower oil. The raw dough was analyzed using portable Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) and handheld FT near (FT-NIR) spectrometers. The fatty acid profile was determined by using fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) methods. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) with cross-validation (leave-one-out) was used to build up a model to predict the percentage of insect lipid added showing a low standard error of cross-validation (SECV ≤ 0.71%), strong correlation (RCV ≥ 0.85), and great predictive ability (RPD, 5.21–5.53) with the external validation set. The saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids as well as the content of palmitic, oleic, and linoleic were correctly predicted with values of SECV ≤ 5.64% and an RCV ≥ 0.88. Nonetheless, the FT-MIR device tested showed higher performance to predict SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and fatty acids reaching values of 0.97 in coefficient of correlation (RP) and 2.81% in standard error in prediction (SEP).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Bioprocess Technology
Food and Bioprocess Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Food and Bioprocess Technology provides an effective and timely platform for cutting-edge high quality original papers in the engineering and science of all types of food processing technologies, from the original food supply source to the consumer’s dinner table. It aims to be a leading international journal for the multidisciplinary agri-food research community. The journal focuses especially on experimental or theoretical research findings that have the potential for helping the agri-food industry to improve process efficiency, enhance product quality and, extend shelf-life of fresh and processed agri-food products. The editors present critical reviews on new perspectives to established processes, innovative and emerging technologies, and trends and future research in food and bioproducts processing. The journal also publishes short communications for rapidly disseminating preliminary results, letters to the Editor on recent developments and controversy, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信