高密度假体放射治疗方案对几何不确定性的鲁棒性

IF 0.4 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. P. Zharkova, D. A. Tovmasian, A. P. Chernyaev, A. V. Nechesnyuk, S. M. Varzar, A. A. Loginova
{"title":"高密度假体放射治疗方案对几何不确定性的鲁棒性","authors":"A. P. Zharkova,&nbsp;D. A. Tovmasian,&nbsp;A. P. Chernyaev,&nbsp;A. V. Nechesnyuk,&nbsp;S. M. Varzar,&nbsp;A. A. Loginova","doi":"10.3103/S0027134925700067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of introducing additional target margins has proven effective in photon radiotherapy and, therefore, is a widely accepted method for ensuring the required dose distribution during planning. However, due to the specific interactions of photon radiation with matter in cases of significant tissue heterogeneity, radiotherapy planning necessitates assessing the robustness of the plan or developing a plan resilient to existing dose delivery uncertainties. This study tested the robustness of radiotherapy plans to geometric uncertainties using two irradiation technologies: CRT (conformal radiation therapy) and IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy). A total of 15 patient plans with metallic prostheses were analyzed. The patient’s position relative to the isocenter of the irradiation beams was geometrically shifted to simulate potential patient setup errors. Data on actual displacements obtained during pretreatment visualization—approximately 25 000 treatment fractions for patients with various tumor localizations—were analyzed. According to the results of the study, the probability of not achieving the required dose distribution for the clinical target volume is no more than <span>\\(0.04\\pm 0.03\\%\\)</span> when using the CRT technique and no more than <span>\\(7\\pm 4\\%\\)</span> when using IMRT. Thus, the CRT plans demonstrated greater robustness with respect to the target compared to IMRT plans. When IMRT techniques are required for treating patients with prostheses, increased attention must be paid to the patient’s setup and plan robustness verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":711,"journal":{"name":"Moscow University Physics Bulletin","volume":"80 1","pages":"145 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of Radiotherapy Plans to Geometric Uncertainties in Irradiating Patients with High-Density Prostheses\",\"authors\":\"A. P. Zharkova,&nbsp;D. A. Tovmasian,&nbsp;A. P. Chernyaev,&nbsp;A. V. Nechesnyuk,&nbsp;S. M. Varzar,&nbsp;A. A. Loginova\",\"doi\":\"10.3103/S0027134925700067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The concept of introducing additional target margins has proven effective in photon radiotherapy and, therefore, is a widely accepted method for ensuring the required dose distribution during planning. However, due to the specific interactions of photon radiation with matter in cases of significant tissue heterogeneity, radiotherapy planning necessitates assessing the robustness of the plan or developing a plan resilient to existing dose delivery uncertainties. This study tested the robustness of radiotherapy plans to geometric uncertainties using two irradiation technologies: CRT (conformal radiation therapy) and IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy). A total of 15 patient plans with metallic prostheses were analyzed. The patient’s position relative to the isocenter of the irradiation beams was geometrically shifted to simulate potential patient setup errors. Data on actual displacements obtained during pretreatment visualization—approximately 25 000 treatment fractions for patients with various tumor localizations—were analyzed. According to the results of the study, the probability of not achieving the required dose distribution for the clinical target volume is no more than <span>\\\\(0.04\\\\pm 0.03\\\\%\\\\)</span> when using the CRT technique and no more than <span>\\\\(7\\\\pm 4\\\\%\\\\)</span> when using IMRT. Thus, the CRT plans demonstrated greater robustness with respect to the target compared to IMRT plans. When IMRT techniques are required for treating patients with prostheses, increased attention must be paid to the patient’s setup and plan robustness verification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moscow University Physics Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moscow University Physics Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0027134925700067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moscow University Physics Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0027134925700067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引入额外靶距的概念已被证明在光子放射治疗中是有效的,因此,是一种在计划期间确保所需剂量分布的广泛接受的方法。然而,由于光子辐射在组织异质性显著的情况下与物质的特定相互作用,放疗计划需要评估计划的稳健性或制定一个计划,以适应现有剂量传递的不确定性。本研究使用两种放射技术:CRT(适形放射治疗)和IMRT(调强放射治疗)测试了放射治疗计划对几何不确定性的稳健性。我们分析了15例使用金属假体的患者方案。病人的位置相对于辐照光束的等中心被几何移位,以模拟潜在的病人设置误差。分析了在预处理可视化过程中获得的实际位移数据——大约25000个不同肿瘤定位患者的治疗分数。根据研究结果,使用CRT技术时未达到临床靶体积所需剂量分布的概率不大于\(0.04\pm 0.03\%\),使用IMRT时不大于\(7\pm 4\%\)。因此,与IMRT计划相比,CRT计划在靶区表现出更强的稳健性。当需要IMRT技术治疗假体患者时,必须增加对患者设置和计划鲁棒性验证的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robustness of Radiotherapy Plans to Geometric Uncertainties in Irradiating Patients with High-Density Prostheses

The concept of introducing additional target margins has proven effective in photon radiotherapy and, therefore, is a widely accepted method for ensuring the required dose distribution during planning. However, due to the specific interactions of photon radiation with matter in cases of significant tissue heterogeneity, radiotherapy planning necessitates assessing the robustness of the plan or developing a plan resilient to existing dose delivery uncertainties. This study tested the robustness of radiotherapy plans to geometric uncertainties using two irradiation technologies: CRT (conformal radiation therapy) and IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy). A total of 15 patient plans with metallic prostheses were analyzed. The patient’s position relative to the isocenter of the irradiation beams was geometrically shifted to simulate potential patient setup errors. Data on actual displacements obtained during pretreatment visualization—approximately 25 000 treatment fractions for patients with various tumor localizations—were analyzed. According to the results of the study, the probability of not achieving the required dose distribution for the clinical target volume is no more than \(0.04\pm 0.03\%\) when using the CRT technique and no more than \(7\pm 4\%\) when using IMRT. Thus, the CRT plans demonstrated greater robustness with respect to the target compared to IMRT plans. When IMRT techniques are required for treating patients with prostheses, increased attention must be paid to the patient’s setup and plan robustness verification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Moscow University Physics Bulletin
Moscow University Physics Bulletin PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Moscow University Physics Bulletin publishes original papers (reviews, articles, and brief communications) in the following fields of experimental and theoretical physics: theoretical and mathematical physics; physics of nuclei and elementary particles; radiophysics, electronics, acoustics; optics and spectroscopy; laser physics; condensed matter physics; chemical physics, physical kinetics, and plasma physics; biophysics and medical physics; astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology; physics of the Earth’s, atmosphere, and hydrosphere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信