复杂网络中节点影响测量方法的比较研究

IF 8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Seyed Amir Sheikh Ahmadi , Laleh Tafakori , Mahdi Jalili , Parham Moradi
{"title":"复杂网络中节点影响测量方法的比较研究","authors":"Seyed Amir Sheikh Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Laleh Tafakori ,&nbsp;Mahdi Jalili ,&nbsp;Parham Moradi","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying influential nodes in complex networks has attracted significant research attention due to its applications in diverse fields ranging from viral marketing to epidemics and behavioral analytics. Most of the existing algorithms primarily assess node influence by measuring their spreading power, encompassing a spectrum from structural centrality metrics to machine learning and graph neural network based approaches. This study first provides a comprehensive review of various influential node identification methods and subsequently conducts an extensive comparative analysis. Using a unified platform applied to multiple standard real-world networks, we evaluate the performance, predictive accuracy, and computational cost of these methods. Our findings indicate that no single algorithm consistently outperforms others across all network types. While learning-based methods, particularly graph neural network, generally achieve higher predictive accuracy, they exhibit lower interpretability and impose greater computational costs. Therefore, selecting an appropriate method necessitates a balance between complexity and accuracy, tailored to the specific application context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 111088"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of methods for measuring node influence in complex networks\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Amir Sheikh Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Laleh Tafakori ,&nbsp;Mahdi Jalili ,&nbsp;Parham Moradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Identifying influential nodes in complex networks has attracted significant research attention due to its applications in diverse fields ranging from viral marketing to epidemics and behavioral analytics. Most of the existing algorithms primarily assess node influence by measuring their spreading power, encompassing a spectrum from structural centrality metrics to machine learning and graph neural network based approaches. This study first provides a comprehensive review of various influential node identification methods and subsequently conducts an extensive comparative analysis. Using a unified platform applied to multiple standard real-world networks, we evaluate the performance, predictive accuracy, and computational cost of these methods. Our findings indicate that no single algorithm consistently outperforms others across all network types. While learning-based methods, particularly graph neural network, generally achieve higher predictive accuracy, they exhibit lower interpretability and impose greater computational costs. Therefore, selecting an appropriate method necessitates a balance between complexity and accuracy, tailored to the specific application context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625010899\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625010899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别复杂网络中的影响节点由于其在从病毒营销到流行病和行为分析等各个领域的应用而引起了广泛的研究关注。大多数现有算法主要通过测量节点的传播能力来评估节点的影响,包括从结构中心性度量到机器学习和基于图神经网络的方法。本研究首先对各种有影响的节点识别方法进行了全面的综述,然后进行了广泛的比较分析。使用应用于多个标准现实世界网络的统一平台,我们评估了这些方法的性能、预测准确性和计算成本。我们的研究结果表明,没有一种算法在所有网络类型中始终优于其他算法。虽然基于学习的方法,特别是图神经网络,通常可以实现更高的预测精度,但它们的可解释性较低,并且会带来更高的计算成本。因此,选择合适的方法需要在复杂性和准确性之间取得平衡,并根据特定的应用程序上下文进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of methods for measuring node influence in complex networks
Identifying influential nodes in complex networks has attracted significant research attention due to its applications in diverse fields ranging from viral marketing to epidemics and behavioral analytics. Most of the existing algorithms primarily assess node influence by measuring their spreading power, encompassing a spectrum from structural centrality metrics to machine learning and graph neural network based approaches. This study first provides a comprehensive review of various influential node identification methods and subsequently conducts an extensive comparative analysis. Using a unified platform applied to multiple standard real-world networks, we evaluate the performance, predictive accuracy, and computational cost of these methods. Our findings indicate that no single algorithm consistently outperforms others across all network types. While learning-based methods, particularly graph neural network, generally achieve higher predictive accuracy, they exhibit lower interpretability and impose greater computational costs. Therefore, selecting an appropriate method necessitates a balance between complexity and accuracy, tailored to the specific application context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信