外科过渡护理干预及其结果:范围综述

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
G. Tobiano , W. Chaboyer , K. Turner , A.M. Eskes , B. Patel , J. Colquhoun , L. Ferronato , B.M. Gillespie
{"title":"外科过渡护理干预及其结果:范围综述","authors":"G. Tobiano ,&nbsp;W. Chaboyer ,&nbsp;K. Turner ,&nbsp;A.M. Eskes ,&nbsp;B. Patel ,&nbsp;J. Colquhoun ,&nbsp;L. Ferronato ,&nbsp;B.M. Gillespie","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The few reviews available on surgical transitional care interventions focus on intervention effectiveness on readmissions, showing that transitional care interventions may reduce readmissions. More detailed guidance is needed for clinicians and researchers to adapt and implement these interventions and evaluate their effect.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify, synthesise and map the evidence on surgical transitional care intervention components and surgical patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched, followed by backward and forward citation searching. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts, and then full-texts. Data were extracted about study and intervention characteristics by one researcher, and checked for accuracy by a second researcher. To summarise the data, intervention components and outcome measures were categorised according to an existing list of transitional care intervention components and a core outcome set for perioperative patients, which were presented as tables, figures, and text.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 5176 articles found, 30 studies were included. Most studies focussed on cardiothoracic, general and orthopaedic surgery, and were primarily conducted in Asia and North America. Outcomes frequently measured were hospital readmissions, followed by health-related quality of life. Pre-discharge assessment, education and discharge planning, post-discharge telephone calls, and caregiver involvement were the most common intervention components. Generally, they demonstrated positive outcomes for hospital readmission and patient satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is large focus on re-admission as an outcome measure, presenting an opportunity to explore a broader range of patient-centred and transition specific outcome measures. While common transitional care intervention components were uncovered, the evidence-base for each individual component is unclear. Gaps were found in surgical populations and settings, with most transitional care interventions focussing on cardiothoracic surgery across a limited geographic context, highlighting the opportunity to build the evidence-base for surgical transitional care interventions across a range of contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Review registration</h3><div>The Open Science Framework (<span><span>https://osf.io/kf2v7/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical transitional care interventions and their outcomes: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"G. Tobiano ,&nbsp;W. Chaboyer ,&nbsp;K. Turner ,&nbsp;A.M. Eskes ,&nbsp;B. Patel ,&nbsp;J. Colquhoun ,&nbsp;L. Ferronato ,&nbsp;B.M. Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The few reviews available on surgical transitional care interventions focus on intervention effectiveness on readmissions, showing that transitional care interventions may reduce readmissions. More detailed guidance is needed for clinicians and researchers to adapt and implement these interventions and evaluate their effect.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify, synthesise and map the evidence on surgical transitional care intervention components and surgical patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched, followed by backward and forward citation searching. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts, and then full-texts. Data were extracted about study and intervention characteristics by one researcher, and checked for accuracy by a second researcher. To summarise the data, intervention components and outcome measures were categorised according to an existing list of transitional care intervention components and a core outcome set for perioperative patients, which were presented as tables, figures, and text.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 5176 articles found, 30 studies were included. Most studies focussed on cardiothoracic, general and orthopaedic surgery, and were primarily conducted in Asia and North America. Outcomes frequently measured were hospital readmissions, followed by health-related quality of life. Pre-discharge assessment, education and discharge planning, post-discharge telephone calls, and caregiver involvement were the most common intervention components. Generally, they demonstrated positive outcomes for hospital readmission and patient satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is large focus on re-admission as an outcome measure, presenting an opportunity to explore a broader range of patient-centred and transition specific outcome measures. While common transitional care intervention components were uncovered, the evidence-base for each individual component is unclear. Gaps were found in surgical populations and settings, with most transitional care interventions focussing on cardiothoracic surgery across a limited geographic context, highlighting the opportunity to build the evidence-base for surgical transitional care interventions across a range of contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Review registration</h3><div>The Open Science Framework (<span><span>https://osf.io/kf2v7/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于外科过渡护理干预的少数综述关注于再入院的干预效果,表明过渡护理干预可能减少再入院。临床医生和研究人员需要更详细的指导来适应和实施这些干预措施并评估其效果。目的识别、综合和绘制手术过渡期护理干预成分和手术患者预后的证据。DesignScoping审查。方法检索medline、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库,进行逆向和正向引文检索。两位研究者独立筛选题目和摘要,然后是全文。一名研究人员提取了有关研究和干预特征的数据,并由另一名研究人员检查其准确性。为了总结数据,根据现有的过渡性护理干预成分列表和围手术期患者的核心结果集,对干预成分和结果措施进行分类,并以表格、图表和文本的形式呈现。结果在5176篇文献中,纳入了30项研究。大多数研究集中在心胸外科、普通外科和骨科,主要在亚洲和北美进行。经常测量的结果是再入院,其次是与健康相关的生活质量。出院前评估、教育和出院计划、出院后电话和护理人员参与是最常见的干预成分。总的来说,他们在再入院和患者满意度方面表现出积极的结果。结论将再入院作为一种结果衡量指标有很大的关注,这为探索更广泛的以患者为中心和过渡特定的结果衡量指标提供了机会。虽然发现了常见的过渡性护理干预成分,但每个单独成分的证据基础尚不清楚。在手术人群和环境中发现了差距,大多数过渡护理干预措施侧重于有限地理背景下的心胸外科手术,这突出了在一系列背景下建立外科过渡护理干预证据基础的机会。开放科学框架(https://osf.io/kf2v7/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical transitional care interventions and their outcomes: a scoping review

Background

The few reviews available on surgical transitional care interventions focus on intervention effectiveness on readmissions, showing that transitional care interventions may reduce readmissions. More detailed guidance is needed for clinicians and researchers to adapt and implement these interventions and evaluate their effect.

Objective

To identify, synthesise and map the evidence on surgical transitional care intervention components and surgical patient outcomes.

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched, followed by backward and forward citation searching. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts, and then full-texts. Data were extracted about study and intervention characteristics by one researcher, and checked for accuracy by a second researcher. To summarise the data, intervention components and outcome measures were categorised according to an existing list of transitional care intervention components and a core outcome set for perioperative patients, which were presented as tables, figures, and text.

Results

Of 5176 articles found, 30 studies were included. Most studies focussed on cardiothoracic, general and orthopaedic surgery, and were primarily conducted in Asia and North America. Outcomes frequently measured were hospital readmissions, followed by health-related quality of life. Pre-discharge assessment, education and discharge planning, post-discharge telephone calls, and caregiver involvement were the most common intervention components. Generally, they demonstrated positive outcomes for hospital readmission and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

There is large focus on re-admission as an outcome measure, presenting an opportunity to explore a broader range of patient-centred and transition specific outcome measures. While common transitional care intervention components were uncovered, the evidence-base for each individual component is unclear. Gaps were found in surgical populations and settings, with most transitional care interventions focussing on cardiothoracic surgery across a limited geographic context, highlighting the opportunity to build the evidence-base for surgical transitional care interventions across a range of contexts.

Review registration

The Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/kf2v7/).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信