改进了亚马逊保护区森林火灾后恢复轨迹的评估

IF 11.4 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qianhan Wu , Calvin K.F. Lee , Jonathan A. Wang , Yingyi Zhao , Guangqin Song , Eduardo Eiji Maeda , Yanjun Su , Alfredo Huete , Alice C. Hughes , Jin Wu
{"title":"改进了亚马逊保护区森林火灾后恢复轨迹的评估","authors":"Qianhan Wu ,&nbsp;Calvin K.F. Lee ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Wang ,&nbsp;Yingyi Zhao ,&nbsp;Guangqin Song ,&nbsp;Eduardo Eiji Maeda ,&nbsp;Yanjun Su ,&nbsp;Alfredo Huete ,&nbsp;Alice C. Hughes ,&nbsp;Jin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protected areas (PAs) in Amazon forests are vital in preserving tropical forest ecosystems and mitigating forest degradation. However, the increasing frequency and severity of fires in these regions necessitate a comprehensive understanding of post-fire vegetation recovery trajectories, which is essential to evaluate the effectiveness and resilience of PAs in the face of ongoing climate change. Recovery trajectories under natural conditions remain uncertain, as unregulated human settlements often interfere with or influence the recovery process, skewing the actual recovery rates detected by satellite remote sensing. To tackle this issue, we examined 2990 MODIS-derived fire events in eastern Amazon PAs from 2001 to 2020. We assessed the effectiveness of multi-source Earth observation data and the eXtreme Gradient Boost machine learning model to distinguish burned areas undergoing natural recovery (natural recovery areas) from areas that are permanently converted to other uses (permanently converted areas). We then analyzed greenness recovery rates and canopy structure recovery trajectories across all burned areas, natural recovery areas, and permanently converted areas. Greenness recovery rates were derived from Landsat data, while canopy structure recovery was assessed using GEDI lidar-derived metrics and the space-for-time substitution approach. Our model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 87.90 %, accurately differentiating natural recovery areas (<em>n</em> = 1944) from permanently converted areas (<em>n</em> = 1046). The differing patterns of post-fire greenness recovery rates and structure recovery trajectories highlight the importance of this distinction. In natural recovery areas, significant recovery of structural traits such as relative heights (RHs), canopy cover (CC), and plant area index (PAIs), was observed, returning to their pre-disturbance levels over a 20-year period. Notably, metrics related to understory recovery and plant vertical space use, such as PAI values across the entire vertical strata, exhibited stronger recovery rates than height-related metrics like RHs, highlighting their utility in characterizing complex ecosystem recovery processes. These findings demonstrate the potential and necessity of using multi-source Earth observation data to distinguish different post-fire vegetation recovery processes. This distinction improves our understanding of ecological recovery rates and the successional dynamics of post-fire forests under natural conditions, offering new opportunities to explore their biogeographical distribution, recovery rate variabilities, and impacts on carbon sequestration and ecosystem resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 114802"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved assessment of post-fire recovery trajectory of forests in Amazon's protected areas\",\"authors\":\"Qianhan Wu ,&nbsp;Calvin K.F. Lee ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Wang ,&nbsp;Yingyi Zhao ,&nbsp;Guangqin Song ,&nbsp;Eduardo Eiji Maeda ,&nbsp;Yanjun Su ,&nbsp;Alfredo Huete ,&nbsp;Alice C. Hughes ,&nbsp;Jin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Protected areas (PAs) in Amazon forests are vital in preserving tropical forest ecosystems and mitigating forest degradation. However, the increasing frequency and severity of fires in these regions necessitate a comprehensive understanding of post-fire vegetation recovery trajectories, which is essential to evaluate the effectiveness and resilience of PAs in the face of ongoing climate change. Recovery trajectories under natural conditions remain uncertain, as unregulated human settlements often interfere with or influence the recovery process, skewing the actual recovery rates detected by satellite remote sensing. To tackle this issue, we examined 2990 MODIS-derived fire events in eastern Amazon PAs from 2001 to 2020. We assessed the effectiveness of multi-source Earth observation data and the eXtreme Gradient Boost machine learning model to distinguish burned areas undergoing natural recovery (natural recovery areas) from areas that are permanently converted to other uses (permanently converted areas). We then analyzed greenness recovery rates and canopy structure recovery trajectories across all burned areas, natural recovery areas, and permanently converted areas. Greenness recovery rates were derived from Landsat data, while canopy structure recovery was assessed using GEDI lidar-derived metrics and the space-for-time substitution approach. Our model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 87.90 %, accurately differentiating natural recovery areas (<em>n</em> = 1944) from permanently converted areas (<em>n</em> = 1046). The differing patterns of post-fire greenness recovery rates and structure recovery trajectories highlight the importance of this distinction. In natural recovery areas, significant recovery of structural traits such as relative heights (RHs), canopy cover (CC), and plant area index (PAIs), was observed, returning to their pre-disturbance levels over a 20-year period. Notably, metrics related to understory recovery and plant vertical space use, such as PAI values across the entire vertical strata, exhibited stronger recovery rates than height-related metrics like RHs, highlighting their utility in characterizing complex ecosystem recovery processes. These findings demonstrate the potential and necessity of using multi-source Earth observation data to distinguish different post-fire vegetation recovery processes. This distinction improves our understanding of ecological recovery rates and the successional dynamics of post-fire forests under natural conditions, offering new opportunities to explore their biogeographical distribution, recovery rate variabilities, and impacts on carbon sequestration and ecosystem resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725002068\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725002068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚马逊森林保护区对于保护热带森林生态系统和缓解森林退化至关重要。然而,这些地区火灾的频率和严重程度不断增加,需要全面了解火灾后植被恢复轨迹,这对于评估保护区在面对持续气候变化时的有效性和恢复能力至关重要。自然条件下的恢复轨迹仍然不确定,因为不受管制的人类住区常常干扰或影响恢复过程,使卫星遥感探测到的实际恢复速度出现偏差。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了2001年至2020年亚马逊东部地区2990起modis衍生的火灾事件。我们评估了多源地球观测数据和eXtreme Gradient Boost机器学习模型的有效性,以区分正在进行自然恢复的烧毁区域(自然恢复区域)和永久转换为其他用途的区域(永久转换区域)。然后,我们分析了所有燃烧区、自然恢复区和永久转换区的绿化恢复率和冠层结构恢复轨迹。绿化恢复速率来自Landsat数据,而冠层结构恢复使用GEDI激光雷达衍生的指标和时空替代方法进行评估。我们的模型实现了87.90%的总体分类精度,准确地区分了自然恢复区(n = 1944)和永久转换区(n = 1046)。火灾后绿化恢复速率和结构恢复轨迹的不同模式突出了这种区别的重要性。在自然恢复区,相对高度(RHs)、冠层覆盖度(CC)和植物面积指数(PAIs)等结构特征在20年间显著恢复到干扰前的水平。值得注意的是,与林下植被恢复和植物垂直空间利用相关的指标,如整个垂直地层的PAI值,显示出比RHs等与高度相关的指标更强的恢复速度,突出了它们在表征复杂生态系统恢复过程中的效用。这些发现证明了利用多源地球观测数据来区分不同的火灾后植被恢复过程的潜力和必要性。这种差异提高了我们对自然条件下火灾后森林生态恢复速率和演替动态的认识,为探索其生物地理分布、恢复速率变异性以及对碳固存和生态系统恢复力的影响提供了新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved assessment of post-fire recovery trajectory of forests in Amazon's protected areas
Protected areas (PAs) in Amazon forests are vital in preserving tropical forest ecosystems and mitigating forest degradation. However, the increasing frequency and severity of fires in these regions necessitate a comprehensive understanding of post-fire vegetation recovery trajectories, which is essential to evaluate the effectiveness and resilience of PAs in the face of ongoing climate change. Recovery trajectories under natural conditions remain uncertain, as unregulated human settlements often interfere with or influence the recovery process, skewing the actual recovery rates detected by satellite remote sensing. To tackle this issue, we examined 2990 MODIS-derived fire events in eastern Amazon PAs from 2001 to 2020. We assessed the effectiveness of multi-source Earth observation data and the eXtreme Gradient Boost machine learning model to distinguish burned areas undergoing natural recovery (natural recovery areas) from areas that are permanently converted to other uses (permanently converted areas). We then analyzed greenness recovery rates and canopy structure recovery trajectories across all burned areas, natural recovery areas, and permanently converted areas. Greenness recovery rates were derived from Landsat data, while canopy structure recovery was assessed using GEDI lidar-derived metrics and the space-for-time substitution approach. Our model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 87.90 %, accurately differentiating natural recovery areas (n = 1944) from permanently converted areas (n = 1046). The differing patterns of post-fire greenness recovery rates and structure recovery trajectories highlight the importance of this distinction. In natural recovery areas, significant recovery of structural traits such as relative heights (RHs), canopy cover (CC), and plant area index (PAIs), was observed, returning to their pre-disturbance levels over a 20-year period. Notably, metrics related to understory recovery and plant vertical space use, such as PAI values across the entire vertical strata, exhibited stronger recovery rates than height-related metrics like RHs, highlighting their utility in characterizing complex ecosystem recovery processes. These findings demonstrate the potential and necessity of using multi-source Earth observation data to distinguish different post-fire vegetation recovery processes. This distinction improves our understanding of ecological recovery rates and the successional dynamics of post-fire forests under natural conditions, offering new opportunities to explore their biogeographical distribution, recovery rate variabilities, and impacts on carbon sequestration and ecosystem resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信