{"title":"哪一个对全颈部放射治疗的剂量分布影响更大,每日颈部体积变化,还是残余设置误差?","authors":"Yuki Aoyama, Tetsuya Tomida, Shogo Tsunemine, Susumu Nagata","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The demand for treatment replanning has been reported in radiation therapy for the head-and-neck region because of changes in the patient’s volume or tumor shape. As the dose calculation for PreciseART<sup>Ⓡ</sup> is automatically determined based on megavoltage computed tomography images, monitoring the impacts of daily volume changes on the dose distribution could help performing the treatment replanning with Re-CT images at most optimal time. However, performing treatment replanning at the optimal timing is difficult unless the factors influencing volume changes or setup errors are determined. Therefore, this study aimed to infer the major influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the head-and-neck region at Shizuoka Cancer Center were enrolled in this study. The differences in the dose distributions per volume change and setup error were evaluated to obtain correlation coefficients. Volume changes were defined as a change in structure volume for the neck region, and setup errors were defined as uncorrectable differences in the vertebral body positions when images are collated in pitch, yaw (i.e., residual setup error), and at shoulder positions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The highest correlation value coefficient indicates the volume change with −0.71 for D95%_CTV, followed by −0.68 for Dmean_CTV, and −0.63 for Dmean_PTV. The correlation between the radiation dose and setup errors was lower than between volume change and radiation dose.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on our findings, neck volume change has a greater impact on dose distribution compared to residual setup errors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 5","pages":"Article 101968"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which has more influence on dose distribution for whole neck radiation therapy, daily neck volume change, or residual setup errors?\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Aoyama, Tetsuya Tomida, Shogo Tsunemine, Susumu Nagata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The demand for treatment replanning has been reported in radiation therapy for the head-and-neck region because of changes in the patient’s volume or tumor shape. As the dose calculation for PreciseART<sup>Ⓡ</sup> is automatically determined based on megavoltage computed tomography images, monitoring the impacts of daily volume changes on the dose distribution could help performing the treatment replanning with Re-CT images at most optimal time. However, performing treatment replanning at the optimal timing is difficult unless the factors influencing volume changes or setup errors are determined. Therefore, this study aimed to infer the major influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the head-and-neck region at Shizuoka Cancer Center were enrolled in this study. The differences in the dose distributions per volume change and setup error were evaluated to obtain correlation coefficients. Volume changes were defined as a change in structure volume for the neck region, and setup errors were defined as uncorrectable differences in the vertebral body positions when images are collated in pitch, yaw (i.e., residual setup error), and at shoulder positions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The highest correlation value coefficient indicates the volume change with −0.71 for D95%_CTV, followed by −0.68 for Dmean_CTV, and −0.63 for Dmean_PTV. The correlation between the radiation dose and setup errors was lower than between volume change and radiation dose.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on our findings, neck volume change has a greater impact on dose distribution compared to residual setup errors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865425001183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865425001183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Which has more influence on dose distribution for whole neck radiation therapy, daily neck volume change, or residual setup errors?
Introduction
The demand for treatment replanning has been reported in radiation therapy for the head-and-neck region because of changes in the patient’s volume or tumor shape. As the dose calculation for PreciseARTⓇ is automatically determined based on megavoltage computed tomography images, monitoring the impacts of daily volume changes on the dose distribution could help performing the treatment replanning with Re-CT images at most optimal time. However, performing treatment replanning at the optimal timing is difficult unless the factors influencing volume changes or setup errors are determined. Therefore, this study aimed to infer the major influencing factors.
Methods
Thirty patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the head-and-neck region at Shizuoka Cancer Center were enrolled in this study. The differences in the dose distributions per volume change and setup error were evaluated to obtain correlation coefficients. Volume changes were defined as a change in structure volume for the neck region, and setup errors were defined as uncorrectable differences in the vertebral body positions when images are collated in pitch, yaw (i.e., residual setup error), and at shoulder positions.
Results
The highest correlation value coefficient indicates the volume change with −0.71 for D95%_CTV, followed by −0.68 for Dmean_CTV, and −0.63 for Dmean_PTV. The correlation between the radiation dose and setup errors was lower than between volume change and radiation dose.
Conclusion
Based on our findings, neck volume change has a greater impact on dose distribution compared to residual setup errors.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.