Rhiannon Roberts MPH , Peter Tanuseputro MD, MHSc , Peter Lawlor DMed, FRCPI, MMedSci , Shirley H. Bush MBBS, MRCGP, FAChPM , Christine L. Watt MSc, MD, CCFP(PC) , Michael Pugliese MSc , Genevieve Casey MD , Frank Knoefel MD , Kednapa Thavorn PhD, BPharm, MPharm , Franco Momoli PhD, MSc , Colleen Webber PhD
{"title":"长期护理所有权和经营者因素在可能的谵妄:来自加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的研究","authors":"Rhiannon Roberts MPH , Peter Tanuseputro MD, MHSc , Peter Lawlor DMed, FRCPI, MMedSci , Shirley H. Bush MBBS, MRCGP, FAChPM , Christine L. Watt MSc, MD, CCFP(PC) , Michael Pugliese MSc , Genevieve Casey MD , Frank Knoefel MD , Kednapa Thavorn PhD, BPharm, MPharm , Franco Momoli PhD, MSc , Colleen Webber PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the association between long-term care (LTC) home ownership models and operator characteristics and the prevalence of probable delirium.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study using provincial health administrative data.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>All LTC residents aged 65–105 years in Ontario, Canada, who underwent assessment via the Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Probable delirium was identified using the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol on the Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, assessment. LTC home ownership model (for-profit, not-for-profit, and municipal) and operator characteristics (chain status, operator size, and home size) were evaluated in relation to probable delirium using multivariable logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 169,762 LTC residents included in this study, 94,014 (55.4%) lived in for-profit homes, 42,051 (24.8%) in not-for-profit homes, and 33,697 (19.8%) in municipal homes. Only 3.6% (n = 6182) had probable delirium. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of probable delirium in for-profit and municipal homes were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.66–1.06) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64–1.25), respectively, compared with not-for-profit homes. Residents in larger homes had a reduced odds of probable delirium (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33–0.72 for 50–99 beds; aOR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.47–0.99 for 100–149 beds, ≥150 beds vs <50 beds). The adjusted odds of probable delirium did not differ across chain status or operator size.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>LTC residents in homes with ≥50 beds had reduced odds of probable delirium. This finding may reflect differences in delirium risk or identification across home ownership models. There was no evidence that the prevalence of probable delirium varied across LTC home ownership models, operator size, or chain status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 7","pages":"Article 105610"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Care Ownership and Operator Factors in Probable Delirium: A Population-Based Study from Ontario, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Rhiannon Roberts MPH , Peter Tanuseputro MD, MHSc , Peter Lawlor DMed, FRCPI, MMedSci , Shirley H. Bush MBBS, MRCGP, FAChPM , Christine L. Watt MSc, MD, CCFP(PC) , Michael Pugliese MSc , Genevieve Casey MD , Frank Knoefel MD , Kednapa Thavorn PhD, BPharm, MPharm , Franco Momoli PhD, MSc , Colleen Webber PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the association between long-term care (LTC) home ownership models and operator characteristics and the prevalence of probable delirium.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study using provincial health administrative data.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>All LTC residents aged 65–105 years in Ontario, Canada, who underwent assessment via the Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Probable delirium was identified using the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol on the Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, assessment. LTC home ownership model (for-profit, not-for-profit, and municipal) and operator characteristics (chain status, operator size, and home size) were evaluated in relation to probable delirium using multivariable logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 169,762 LTC residents included in this study, 94,014 (55.4%) lived in for-profit homes, 42,051 (24.8%) in not-for-profit homes, and 33,697 (19.8%) in municipal homes. Only 3.6% (n = 6182) had probable delirium. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of probable delirium in for-profit and municipal homes were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.66–1.06) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64–1.25), respectively, compared with not-for-profit homes. Residents in larger homes had a reduced odds of probable delirium (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33–0.72 for 50–99 beds; aOR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.47–0.99 for 100–149 beds, ≥150 beds vs <50 beds). The adjusted odds of probable delirium did not differ across chain status or operator size.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>LTC residents in homes with ≥50 beds had reduced odds of probable delirium. This finding may reflect differences in delirium risk or identification across home ownership models. There was no evidence that the prevalence of probable delirium varied across LTC home ownership models, operator size, or chain status.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 105610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025001276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025001276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Care Ownership and Operator Factors in Probable Delirium: A Population-Based Study from Ontario, Canada
Objectives
To evaluate the association between long-term care (LTC) home ownership models and operator characteristics and the prevalence of probable delirium.
Design
Cross-sectional study using provincial health administrative data.
Setting and Participants
All LTC residents aged 65–105 years in Ontario, Canada, who underwent assessment via the Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.
Methods
Probable delirium was identified using the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol on the Resident Assessment Instrument—Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, assessment. LTC home ownership model (for-profit, not-for-profit, and municipal) and operator characteristics (chain status, operator size, and home size) were evaluated in relation to probable delirium using multivariable logistic regression models.
Results
Among the 169,762 LTC residents included in this study, 94,014 (55.4%) lived in for-profit homes, 42,051 (24.8%) in not-for-profit homes, and 33,697 (19.8%) in municipal homes. Only 3.6% (n = 6182) had probable delirium. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of probable delirium in for-profit and municipal homes were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.66–1.06) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64–1.25), respectively, compared with not-for-profit homes. Residents in larger homes had a reduced odds of probable delirium (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33–0.72 for 50–99 beds; aOR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.47–0.99 for 100–149 beds, ≥150 beds vs <50 beds). The adjusted odds of probable delirium did not differ across chain status or operator size.
Conclusions and Implications
LTC residents in homes with ≥50 beds had reduced odds of probable delirium. This finding may reflect differences in delirium risk or identification across home ownership models. There was no evidence that the prevalence of probable delirium varied across LTC home ownership models, operator size, or chain status.
期刊介绍:
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality