Godehard A. Scholz MD, PhD , Eleftherios Papagiannoulis MSc , Christoph Blapp MSc , Raphael Micheroli MD , Adrian Ciurea MD , Michael J. Nissen MD , Nikhil Yawalkar MD , Diana Dan MD , Jennifer Amsler MD , Almut Scherer PhD , Burkhard Möller MD
{"title":"与TNF抑制剂相比,白细胞介素-12/23或白细胞介素-17抑制剂在TNF抑制剂经历的银屑病关节炎女性患者中的药物滞留时间更长","authors":"Godehard A. Scholz MD, PhD , Eleftherios Papagiannoulis MSc , Christoph Blapp MSc , Raphael Micheroli MD , Adrian Ciurea MD , Michael J. Nissen MD , Nikhil Yawalkar MD , Diana Dan MD , Jennifer Amsler MD , Almut Scherer PhD , Burkhard Möller MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of Interleukin (IL)-12/23 or IL-17A inhibitors (summarized to inhibitors of the Th17 cell generation or function, Th17i) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with TNFi-experienced psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comparative effectiveness study by taking advantage of prospectively collected patients with PsA data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases register, encompassing the interval from January 1, 2015 to August 1, 2021. Drug retention was the primary outcome in unadjusted and inverse propensity-weighted Cox regression models. Secondary outcomes were a static skin score for psoriasis, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 response rates, and the disease activity in PsA score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline, Th17i (n=341) were initiated in patients with more severe skin disease, but with comparable disease activity as TNFi (n=503) in all other disease domains. In the unadjusted analysis, Th17i were later discontinued than TNFi (median 828 vs 445 days, <em>P</em><.001), but the hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly lower for Th17i than for TNFi only in women (0.57 [0.37-0.87], <em>P</em>=.01). Furthermore, differences in static skin scores between the groups at baseline were equalized at follow-up. However, improvements in the disease activity in PsA were similar in both groups, and ACR20 (33% [29%] vs 14% [13%]; <em>P</em>=.03) and ACR50 response rates (24% [21%] vs 7% [6%]; <em>P</em>=.02) were even higher for TNFi in unadjusted and (LUNDEX-adjusted) analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>After TNFi failure, more profound skin improvement and longer drug retention in women argue in favor of switching to Th17i in certain patient populations. However, TNFi may at least be equivalent in improving locomotor system manifestations and remain a viable option in the first and in the later treatment line of PsA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longer Drug Retention of Interleukin-12/23 or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors Compared With TNF Inhibitors in Female Patients With TNF Inhibitor-Experienced Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"authors\":\"Godehard A. Scholz MD, PhD , Eleftherios Papagiannoulis MSc , Christoph Blapp MSc , Raphael Micheroli MD , Adrian Ciurea MD , Michael J. Nissen MD , Nikhil Yawalkar MD , Diana Dan MD , Jennifer Amsler MD , Almut Scherer PhD , Burkhard Möller MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of Interleukin (IL)-12/23 or IL-17A inhibitors (summarized to inhibitors of the Th17 cell generation or function, Th17i) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with TNFi-experienced psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comparative effectiveness study by taking advantage of prospectively collected patients with PsA data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases register, encompassing the interval from January 1, 2015 to August 1, 2021. Drug retention was the primary outcome in unadjusted and inverse propensity-weighted Cox regression models. Secondary outcomes were a static skin score for psoriasis, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 response rates, and the disease activity in PsA score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline, Th17i (n=341) were initiated in patients with more severe skin disease, but with comparable disease activity as TNFi (n=503) in all other disease domains. In the unadjusted analysis, Th17i were later discontinued than TNFi (median 828 vs 445 days, <em>P</em><.001), but the hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly lower for Th17i than for TNFi only in women (0.57 [0.37-0.87], <em>P</em>=.01). Furthermore, differences in static skin scores between the groups at baseline were equalized at follow-up. However, improvements in the disease activity in PsA were similar in both groups, and ACR20 (33% [29%] vs 14% [13%]; <em>P</em>=.03) and ACR50 response rates (24% [21%] vs 7% [6%]; <em>P</em>=.02) were even higher for TNFi in unadjusted and (LUNDEX-adjusted) analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>After TNFi failure, more profound skin improvement and longer drug retention in women argue in favor of switching to Th17i in certain patient populations. However, TNFi may at least be equivalent in improving locomotor system manifestations and remain a viable option in the first and in the later treatment line of PsA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longer Drug Retention of Interleukin-12/23 or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors Compared With TNF Inhibitors in Female Patients With TNF Inhibitor-Experienced Psoriatic Arthritis
Objective
To compare the effectiveness of Interleukin (IL)-12/23 or IL-17A inhibitors (summarized to inhibitors of the Th17 cell generation or function, Th17i) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with TNFi-experienced psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Patients and Methods
We conducted a comparative effectiveness study by taking advantage of prospectively collected patients with PsA data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases register, encompassing the interval from January 1, 2015 to August 1, 2021. Drug retention was the primary outcome in unadjusted and inverse propensity-weighted Cox regression models. Secondary outcomes were a static skin score for psoriasis, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 response rates, and the disease activity in PsA score.
Results
At baseline, Th17i (n=341) were initiated in patients with more severe skin disease, but with comparable disease activity as TNFi (n=503) in all other disease domains. In the unadjusted analysis, Th17i were later discontinued than TNFi (median 828 vs 445 days, P<.001), but the hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly lower for Th17i than for TNFi only in women (0.57 [0.37-0.87], P=.01). Furthermore, differences in static skin scores between the groups at baseline were equalized at follow-up. However, improvements in the disease activity in PsA were similar in both groups, and ACR20 (33% [29%] vs 14% [13%]; P=.03) and ACR50 response rates (24% [21%] vs 7% [6%]; P=.02) were even higher for TNFi in unadjusted and (LUNDEX-adjusted) analyses.
Conclusion
After TNFi failure, more profound skin improvement and longer drug retention in women argue in favor of switching to Th17i in certain patient populations. However, TNFi may at least be equivalent in improving locomotor system manifestations and remain a viable option in the first and in the later treatment line of PsA.