回顾与展望：批判意识研究中的批判定量视角

IF 4.9 2区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101536

Matthew A Diemer , Michael B Frisby , Kelly M House

{"title":"回顾与展望：批判意识研究中的批判定量视角","authors":"Matthew A Diemer , Michael B Frisby , Kelly M House","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the evolution of quantitative approaches in critical consciousness (CC) research through a critical quantitative (CritQuant) perspective. Historically, CC scholarship relied on qualitative methods due to concerns about the restrictive assumptions and historical biases of quantitative methodologies. However, since 2005, quantitative methods have become common in CC research. We reflect on five principles of CritQuant — foundation, goals, parity, subjectivity, and self-reflexivity — to demonstrate how they align with past and present CC research. Our hope is that CritQuant, QuantCrit, and allied methodologies will continue to inform and be informed by CC and related research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking backward to look forward: Tracing critical quantitative perspectives in critical consciousness research\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A Diemer , Michael B Frisby , Kelly M House\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the evolution of quantitative approaches in critical consciousness (CC) research through a critical quantitative (CritQuant) perspective. Historically, CC scholarship relied on qualitative methods due to concerns about the restrictive assumptions and historical biases of quantitative methodologies. However, since 2005, quantitative methods have become common in CC research. We reflect on five principles of CritQuant — foundation, goals, parity, subjectivity, and self-reflexivity — to demonstrate how they align with past and present CC research. Our hope is that CritQuant, QuantCrit, and allied methodologies will continue to inform and be informed by CC and related research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000555\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过批判定量（CritQuant）的视角考察了定量方法在批判意识（CC）研究中的演变。历史上，CC学术依赖于定性方法，因为担心定量方法的限制性假设和历史偏差。然而，自2005年以来，定量方法在CC研究中变得普遍。我们反思了CritQuant的五个原则——基础、目标、平等、主观性和自我反思——以展示它们如何与过去和现在的CC研究保持一致。我们希望CritQuant、QuantCrit和相关方法将继续为CC和相关研究提供信息，并从CC和相关研究中获得信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Looking backward to look forward: Tracing critical quantitative perspectives in critical consciousness research

This paper examines the evolution of quantitative approaches in critical consciousness (CC) research through a critical quantitative (CritQuant) perspective. Historically, CC scholarship relied on qualitative methods due to concerns about the restrictive assumptions and historical biases of quantitative methodologies. However, since 2005, quantitative methods have become common in CC research. We reflect on five principles of CritQuant — foundation, goals, parity, subjectivity, and self-reflexivity — to demonstrate how they align with past and present CC research. Our hope is that CritQuant, QuantCrit, and allied methodologies will continue to inform and be informed by CC and related research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience

CiteScore

10.90

自引率

2.00%

发文量

135

期刊介绍： Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.