拯救可改革者:非政府组织干预、酷儿死灵政治和印度海吉拉家庭的犯罪化

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Liz Mount
{"title":"拯救可改革者:非政府组织干预、酷儿死灵政治和印度海吉拉家庭的犯罪化","authors":"Liz Mount","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Mainstream feminist discourse often frames families as harmful and violent, especially toward young cisgender women in the South. In India, NGOs (and the state) similarly posit that families of GNC</em> hijras <em>harm younger hijras; they increasingly criminalize</em> hijra <em>families. How is this criminalization related to the criminalization</em> hijras <em>historically faced? What systems shape the criminalization of</em> hijra <em>families by NGOs? Through a qualitative case study analysis (including 75+ interviews) of interactions between Dosti, a large NGO in Bangalore, and</em> hijras<em>, I show that: 1) colonial and contemporary forms of</em> hijra <em>criminalization share necropolitical foundations and, 2) contemporary criminalization is shaped by economic systems incentivizing NGOs to position themselves as protectors of marginalized groups. I find Dosti staff employ “pro-minority” criminalization intended to protect marginalized groups, drawing on rhetoric and narratives criminalizing older</em> hijras<em>. I examine this alongside colonial-era criminalization to show that notions of younger people's need for “rescue” and older</em> hijras' <em>incapability of “reform” are recurrent themes. While Dosti staffs' interventions may reduce violence some younger hijras face, they expose older</em> hijras <em>to increased structural (and police) violence. Thus, Dosti staff are complicit in shaping necropolitical “death worlds” inhabited by older</em> hijras<em>, who cannot rely on</em> hijra <em>support systems. Conflicts between</em> hijras <em>and Dosti reflect broader tensions between global NGO funding agendas and</em> hijras' <em>systems of care and livelihood. The criminalization of</em> hijra <em>practices and economic systems by Dosti staff can be understood as a necropolitical intervention exposing (especially older)</em> hijras <em>to increased state violence and structural precarity.</em></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Rescuing the reformable: NGO interventions, queer necropolitics, and the criminalization of hijra families in India”\",\"authors\":\"Liz Mount\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Mainstream feminist discourse often frames families as harmful and violent, especially toward young cisgender women in the South. In India, NGOs (and the state) similarly posit that families of GNC</em> hijras <em>harm younger hijras; they increasingly criminalize</em> hijra <em>families. How is this criminalization related to the criminalization</em> hijras <em>historically faced? What systems shape the criminalization of</em> hijra <em>families by NGOs? Through a qualitative case study analysis (including 75+ interviews) of interactions between Dosti, a large NGO in Bangalore, and</em> hijras<em>, I show that: 1) colonial and contemporary forms of</em> hijra <em>criminalization share necropolitical foundations and, 2) contemporary criminalization is shaped by economic systems incentivizing NGOs to position themselves as protectors of marginalized groups. I find Dosti staff employ “pro-minority” criminalization intended to protect marginalized groups, drawing on rhetoric and narratives criminalizing older</em> hijras<em>. I examine this alongside colonial-era criminalization to show that notions of younger people's need for “rescue” and older</em> hijras' <em>incapability of “reform” are recurrent themes. While Dosti staffs' interventions may reduce violence some younger hijras face, they expose older</em> hijras <em>to increased structural (and police) violence. Thus, Dosti staff are complicit in shaping necropolitical “death worlds” inhabited by older</em> hijras<em>, who cannot rely on</em> hijra <em>support systems. Conflicts between</em> hijras <em>and Dosti reflect broader tensions between global NGO funding agendas and</em> hijras' <em>systems of care and livelihood. The criminalization of</em> hijra <em>practices and economic systems by Dosti staff can be understood as a necropolitical intervention exposing (especially older)</em> hijras <em>to increased state violence and structural precarity.</em></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027753952500072X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027753952500072X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主流女权主义话语经常把家庭描绘成有害和暴力的,尤其是对南方的年轻顺性别女性。在印度,非政府组织(和政府)同样认为GNC海吉拉家族伤害了年轻的海吉拉;他们越来越多地将海吉拉家庭定为犯罪。这种定罪与海吉拉历来面临的定罪有何关系?是什么制度塑造了非政府组织对海吉拉家庭的定罪?通过对班加罗尔大型非政府组织Dosti与海吉拉互动的定性案例分析(包括75次以上访谈),我发现:1)殖民时期和当代形式的海吉拉定罪有着共同的死亡政治基础;2)当代定罪是由经济体系塑造的,激励非政府组织将自己定位为边缘化群体的保护者。我发现Dosti的工作人员采用“支持少数族裔”的定罪,旨在保护边缘群体,利用将老年海吉拉定为犯罪的修辞和叙述。我将这一点与殖民时代的刑事定罪结合起来,以表明年轻人需要“拯救”和年长海吉拉没有能力“改革”的概念是反复出现的主题。虽然Dosti工作人员的干预可能会减少一些年轻海吉拉面临的暴力,但他们会使年长海吉拉面临更多的结构性(和警察)暴力。因此,Dosti的工作人员共同塑造了由老年海吉拉居住的死亡政治“死亡世界”,他们无法依赖海吉拉的支持系统。海吉拉和多斯蒂之间的冲突反映了全球非政府组织资助议程与海吉拉的护理和生计系统之间更广泛的紧张关系。Dosti工作人员对海吉拉行为和经济制度的定罪可以理解为一种死亡政治干预,使(尤其是年长的)海吉拉暴露于日益增加的国家暴力和结构不稳定之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Rescuing the reformable: NGO interventions, queer necropolitics, and the criminalization of hijra families in India”
Mainstream feminist discourse often frames families as harmful and violent, especially toward young cisgender women in the South. In India, NGOs (and the state) similarly posit that families of GNC hijras harm younger hijras; they increasingly criminalize hijra families. How is this criminalization related to the criminalization hijras historically faced? What systems shape the criminalization of hijra families by NGOs? Through a qualitative case study analysis (including 75+ interviews) of interactions between Dosti, a large NGO in Bangalore, and hijras, I show that: 1) colonial and contemporary forms of hijra criminalization share necropolitical foundations and, 2) contemporary criminalization is shaped by economic systems incentivizing NGOs to position themselves as protectors of marginalized groups. I find Dosti staff employ “pro-minority” criminalization intended to protect marginalized groups, drawing on rhetoric and narratives criminalizing older hijras. I examine this alongside colonial-era criminalization to show that notions of younger people's need for “rescue” and older hijras' incapability of “reform” are recurrent themes. While Dosti staffs' interventions may reduce violence some younger hijras face, they expose older hijras to increased structural (and police) violence. Thus, Dosti staff are complicit in shaping necropolitical “death worlds” inhabited by older hijras, who cannot rely on hijra support systems. Conflicts between hijras and Dosti reflect broader tensions between global NGO funding agendas and hijras' systems of care and livelihood. The criminalization of hijra practices and economic systems by Dosti staff can be understood as a necropolitical intervention exposing (especially older) hijras to increased state violence and structural precarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信