以比例推理代替量纲分析对学生化学概念理解的影响

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Simone Dunphy*,  and , Zachary Weisse, 
{"title":"以比例推理代替量纲分析对学生化学概念理解的影响","authors":"Simone Dunphy*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Zachary Weisse,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0145510.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Dimensional analysis is an algorithm currently in use in almost every chemistry classroom in the United States. Chemistry educators use this procedural tool in the classroom with the intention of providing students with a reliable method to solve many of the relatively simple math problems they encounter. The unintended consequence of using this algorithm is that dimensional analysis divorces conceptual from procedural knowledge and effectively produces students who are answer-getters instead of critical thinkers. Instruction that integrates both conceptual and procedural knowledge into curriculum improves students’ conceptual understanding of a topic while still equipping them with necessary skills to solve rote, mathematical problems. This study assesses the impacts of replacing instruction in dimensional analysis with instruction in proportional reasoning on students’ conceptual chemistry understanding. Results indicate that students who received instruction in proportional reasoning instead of dimensional analysis experienced significantly greater growth in the area of chemistry conceptual understanding when compared to their peers who received instruction in dimensional analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 5","pages":"1788–1802 1788–1802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replacement of Dimensional Analysis with Proportional Reasoning in Introductory Chemistry and Its Effects on Students’ Chemistry Conceptual Understanding\",\"authors\":\"Simone Dunphy*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Zachary Weisse,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0145510.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Dimensional analysis is an algorithm currently in use in almost every chemistry classroom in the United States. Chemistry educators use this procedural tool in the classroom with the intention of providing students with a reliable method to solve many of the relatively simple math problems they encounter. The unintended consequence of using this algorithm is that dimensional analysis divorces conceptual from procedural knowledge and effectively produces students who are answer-getters instead of critical thinkers. Instruction that integrates both conceptual and procedural knowledge into curriculum improves students’ conceptual understanding of a topic while still equipping them with necessary skills to solve rote, mathematical problems. This study assesses the impacts of replacing instruction in dimensional analysis with instruction in proportional reasoning on students’ conceptual chemistry understanding. Results indicate that students who received instruction in proportional reasoning instead of dimensional analysis experienced significantly greater growth in the area of chemistry conceptual understanding when compared to their peers who received instruction in dimensional analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 5\",\"pages\":\"1788–1802 1788–1802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量纲分析是一种算法,目前在美国几乎每个化学教室都在使用。化学教育者在课堂上使用这一程序性工具的目的是为学生提供一种可靠的方法来解决他们遇到的许多相对简单的数学问题。使用这种算法的一个意想不到的后果是,维度分析将概念性知识与程序性知识分离开来,并有效地培养出回答者而不是批判性思考者的学生。将概念性和程序性知识整合到课程中的教学可以提高学生对主题的概念性理解,同时还能使他们具备解决死记硬背的数学问题的必要技能。本研究评估以比例推理取代量纲分析教学对学生概念化学理解的影响。结果表明,与接受量纲分析指导的同龄人相比,接受比例推理指导而不是量纲分析指导的学生在化学概念理解方面有了明显更大的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Replacement of Dimensional Analysis with Proportional Reasoning in Introductory Chemistry and Its Effects on Students’ Chemistry Conceptual Understanding

Dimensional analysis is an algorithm currently in use in almost every chemistry classroom in the United States. Chemistry educators use this procedural tool in the classroom with the intention of providing students with a reliable method to solve many of the relatively simple math problems they encounter. The unintended consequence of using this algorithm is that dimensional analysis divorces conceptual from procedural knowledge and effectively produces students who are answer-getters instead of critical thinkers. Instruction that integrates both conceptual and procedural knowledge into curriculum improves students’ conceptual understanding of a topic while still equipping them with necessary skills to solve rote, mathematical problems. This study assesses the impacts of replacing instruction in dimensional analysis with instruction in proportional reasoning on students’ conceptual chemistry understanding. Results indicate that students who received instruction in proportional reasoning instead of dimensional analysis experienced significantly greater growth in the area of chemistry conceptual understanding when compared to their peers who received instruction in dimensional analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信