调查在线学习和流行病对学生使用机械箭的影响

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Veeda Scammahorn, Samantha Houchlei, Hunter Williams and Melanie M Cooper*, 
{"title":"调查在线学习和流行病对学生使用机械箭的影响","authors":"Veeda Scammahorn,&nbsp;Samantha Houchlei,&nbsp;Hunter Williams and Melanie M Cooper*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0127410.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The impact of the COVID pandemic on student learning is still being felt more than two years after most classes returned to face-to-face instruction. In this study we investigate how the pandemic and the subsequent return to in-person instruction in an organic chemistry course impacted student performance on a pair of tasks for which we have historical data from pre-COVID courses. These tasks require students to draw mechanisms and predict products for two reactions: (1) a familiar reaction that students have been explicitly taught and (2) a reaction that requires students to use their knowledge to predict how an unfamiliar starting material will behave Analysis of the student responses for the familiar task showed that the 2022 (COVID cohort did not perform as well as in earlier studies), but by spring 2023 post COVID students had returned to a more normal pattern of performance that aligned well with our historical pre-COVID data (2018). In contrast, for the historically more difficult unfamiliar reaction, there was no significant difference among the cohorts’ ability to draw a plausible mechanism and predict a product over the three years of the study. That is there appeared to be a cadre of students who were able to complete this task despite the stress of a pandemic and changing instructional modalities. However, the percentage of students who were able to complete this unfamiliar task is typically less than 50% of the total. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 5","pages":"1755–1764 1755–1764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01274","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation into the Impact of Online Learning and the Pandemic on Student Use of Mechanistic Arrows\",\"authors\":\"Veeda Scammahorn,&nbsp;Samantha Houchlei,&nbsp;Hunter Williams and Melanie M Cooper*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0127410.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The impact of the COVID pandemic on student learning is still being felt more than two years after most classes returned to face-to-face instruction. In this study we investigate how the pandemic and the subsequent return to in-person instruction in an organic chemistry course impacted student performance on a pair of tasks for which we have historical data from pre-COVID courses. These tasks require students to draw mechanisms and predict products for two reactions: (1) a familiar reaction that students have been explicitly taught and (2) a reaction that requires students to use their knowledge to predict how an unfamiliar starting material will behave Analysis of the student responses for the familiar task showed that the 2022 (COVID cohort did not perform as well as in earlier studies), but by spring 2023 post COVID students had returned to a more normal pattern of performance that aligned well with our historical pre-COVID data (2018). In contrast, for the historically more difficult unfamiliar reaction, there was no significant difference among the cohorts’ ability to draw a plausible mechanism and predict a product over the three years of the study. That is there appeared to be a cadre of students who were able to complete this task despite the stress of a pandemic and changing instructional modalities. However, the percentage of students who were able to complete this unfamiliar task is typically less than 50% of the total. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 5\",\"pages\":\"1755–1764 1755–1764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01274\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大多数课程恢复面对面教学两年多后,COVID大流行对学生学习的影响仍然存在。在本研究中,我们调查了大流行以及随后在有机化学课程中恢复面对面教学如何影响学生在两项任务中的表现,我们有covid前课程的历史数据。这些任务要求学生画出两种反应的机理和预测产物:(1)明确教授学生熟悉的反应;(2)要求学生利用自己的知识预测不熟悉的起点材料将如何表现的反应。对学生对熟悉任务的反应的分析表明,2022年(COVID队列)的学生表现不如早期的研究好,但到2023年春季,COVID后的学生已经恢复到更正常的表现模式,这与我们在COVID前的历史数据(2018年)很好地吻合。相比之下,对于历史上比较困难的不熟悉反应,在三年的研究中,各组之间绘制合理机制和预测产品的能力没有显著差异。也就是说,尽管面临大流行的压力和教学方式的变化,似乎有一群学生能够完成这项任务。然而,能够完成这项不熟悉任务的学生比例通常不到总人数的50%。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation into the Impact of Online Learning and the Pandemic on Student Use of Mechanistic Arrows

The impact of the COVID pandemic on student learning is still being felt more than two years after most classes returned to face-to-face instruction. In this study we investigate how the pandemic and the subsequent return to in-person instruction in an organic chemistry course impacted student performance on a pair of tasks for which we have historical data from pre-COVID courses. These tasks require students to draw mechanisms and predict products for two reactions: (1) a familiar reaction that students have been explicitly taught and (2) a reaction that requires students to use their knowledge to predict how an unfamiliar starting material will behave Analysis of the student responses for the familiar task showed that the 2022 (COVID cohort did not perform as well as in earlier studies), but by spring 2023 post COVID students had returned to a more normal pattern of performance that aligned well with our historical pre-COVID data (2018). In contrast, for the historically more difficult unfamiliar reaction, there was no significant difference among the cohorts’ ability to draw a plausible mechanism and predict a product over the three years of the study. That is there appeared to be a cadre of students who were able to complete this task despite the stress of a pandemic and changing instructional modalities. However, the percentage of students who were able to complete this unfamiliar task is typically less than 50% of the total. The implications of these findings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信