{"title":"li型有限单群作为共轭子集积的写法","authors":"Daniele Dona","doi":"10.1007/s00493-025-00155-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture (Bull Lond Math Soc 44(3):469–472, 2012) asserts that, for any finite simple non-abelian group <i>G</i> and any set <span>\\(A\\subseteq G\\)</span> with <span>\\(|A|\\ge 2\\)</span>, <i>G</i> is the product of at most <span>\\(N\\frac{\\log |G|}{\\log |A|}\\)</span> conjugates of <i>A</i>, for some absolute constant <i>N</i>. For <i>G</i> of Lie type, we prove that for any <span>\\(\\varepsilon >0\\)</span> there is some <span>\\(N_{\\varepsilon }\\)</span> for which <i>G</i> is the product of at most <span>\\(N_{\\varepsilon }\\left( \\frac{\\log |G|}{\\log |A|}\\right) ^{1+\\varepsilon }\\)</span> conjugates of either <i>A</i> or <span>\\(A^{-1}\\)</span>. For symmetric sets, this improves on results of Liebeck et al. (2012) and Gill et al. (Groups Geom Dyn 7(4):867–882, 2013). During the preparation of this paper, the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture was completed by Lifshitz (Completing the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10127). Both papers use Gill et al. (Initiating the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07800) as a starting point. Lifshitz’s argument uses heavy machinery from representation theory to complete the conjecture, whereas this paper achieves a more modest result by rather elementary combinatorial arguments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50666,"journal":{"name":"Combinatorica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type as Products of Subset Conjugates\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Dona\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00493-025-00155-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture (Bull Lond Math Soc 44(3):469–472, 2012) asserts that, for any finite simple non-abelian group <i>G</i> and any set <span>\\\\(A\\\\subseteq G\\\\)</span> with <span>\\\\(|A|\\\\ge 2\\\\)</span>, <i>G</i> is the product of at most <span>\\\\(N\\\\frac{\\\\log |G|}{\\\\log |A|}\\\\)</span> conjugates of <i>A</i>, for some absolute constant <i>N</i>. For <i>G</i> of Lie type, we prove that for any <span>\\\\(\\\\varepsilon >0\\\\)</span> there is some <span>\\\\(N_{\\\\varepsilon }\\\\)</span> for which <i>G</i> is the product of at most <span>\\\\(N_{\\\\varepsilon }\\\\left( \\\\frac{\\\\log |G|}{\\\\log |A|}\\\\right) ^{1+\\\\varepsilon }\\\\)</span> conjugates of either <i>A</i> or <span>\\\\(A^{-1}\\\\)</span>. For symmetric sets, this improves on results of Liebeck et al. (2012) and Gill et al. (Groups Geom Dyn 7(4):867–882, 2013). During the preparation of this paper, the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture was completed by Lifshitz (Completing the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10127). Both papers use Gill et al. (Initiating the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07800) as a starting point. Lifshitz’s argument uses heavy machinery from representation theory to complete the conjecture, whereas this paper achieves a more modest result by rather elementary combinatorial arguments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Combinatorica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Combinatorica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-025-00155-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combinatorica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-025-00155-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Writing Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type as Products of Subset Conjugates
The Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture (Bull Lond Math Soc 44(3):469–472, 2012) asserts that, for any finite simple non-abelian group G and any set \(A\subseteq G\) with \(|A|\ge 2\), G is the product of at most \(N\frac{\log |G|}{\log |A|}\) conjugates of A, for some absolute constant N. For G of Lie type, we prove that for any \(\varepsilon >0\) there is some \(N_{\varepsilon }\) for which G is the product of at most \(N_{\varepsilon }\left( \frac{\log |G|}{\log |A|}\right) ^{1+\varepsilon }\) conjugates of either A or \(A^{-1}\). For symmetric sets, this improves on results of Liebeck et al. (2012) and Gill et al. (Groups Geom Dyn 7(4):867–882, 2013). During the preparation of this paper, the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture was completed by Lifshitz (Completing the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10127). Both papers use Gill et al. (Initiating the proof of the Liebeck–Nikolov–Shalev conjecture, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07800) as a starting point. Lifshitz’s argument uses heavy machinery from representation theory to complete the conjecture, whereas this paper achieves a more modest result by rather elementary combinatorial arguments.
期刊介绍:
COMBINATORICA publishes research papers in English in a variety of areas of combinatorics and the theory of computing, with particular emphasis on general techniques and unifying principles. Typical but not exclusive topics covered by COMBINATORICA are
- Combinatorial structures (graphs, hypergraphs, matroids, designs, permutation groups).
- Combinatorial optimization.
- Combinatorial aspects of geometry and number theory.
- Algorithms in combinatorics and related fields.
- Computational complexity theory.
- Randomization and explicit construction in combinatorics and algorithms.