Tanner Bradford , Bryanna De Lima , Kahley Milauskas , Mary Brooks , Suvi Neukam , Lee E. Neilson
{"title":"质量测量帕金森病的依从性:单中心经验***帕金森病质量测量","authors":"Tanner Bradford , Bryanna De Lima , Kahley Milauskas , Mary Brooks , Suvi Neukam , Lee E. Neilson","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PWPs) often have both motor and non-motor manifestations requiring specialized care. Neurologists typically lead their care; however, the population of PWPs is exceeding the supply of neurologists. Primary care providers (PCPs) may need to contribute to improve care.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To measure American Academy of Neurology quality metric (QM) adherence between neurologists and PCPs for PWPs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center retrospective, descriptive analysis assessing 14 QMs in the past year for PWPs established with a neurologist and PCP. McNemar’s test assessed statistical differences between groups. Logistic regression models explored the impact of age, sex, and visit frequency on QM adherence</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On average, 8.9 QMs were addressed among 89 PWPs. Motor complications, rehabilitation referrals, falls, and autonomic dysfunction were the most often addressed while apathy and impulse control disorder were the least. Neurologists alone met motor complications, psychosis, impulse control disorder, and sleep disturbance significantly more than PCPs alone while PCPs assessed depression and advance care planning more often. PCP involvement improved adherence throughout. Depression, apathy, and advance care planning metric adherence were significantly impacted by age and/or visit frequency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A team-based approach to quality metric adherence may reduce the burden on providers and improve care for PWPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Measure Adherence in Parkinson’s Disease: A Single Center Experience***Parkinson’s Disease Quality Measures\",\"authors\":\"Tanner Bradford , Bryanna De Lima , Kahley Milauskas , Mary Brooks , Suvi Neukam , Lee E. Neilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PWPs) often have both motor and non-motor manifestations requiring specialized care. Neurologists typically lead their care; however, the population of PWPs is exceeding the supply of neurologists. Primary care providers (PCPs) may need to contribute to improve care.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To measure American Academy of Neurology quality metric (QM) adherence between neurologists and PCPs for PWPs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center retrospective, descriptive analysis assessing 14 QMs in the past year for PWPs established with a neurologist and PCP. McNemar’s test assessed statistical differences between groups. Logistic regression models explored the impact of age, sex, and visit frequency on QM adherence</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On average, 8.9 QMs were addressed among 89 PWPs. Motor complications, rehabilitation referrals, falls, and autonomic dysfunction were the most often addressed while apathy and impulse control disorder were the least. Neurologists alone met motor complications, psychosis, impulse control disorder, and sleep disturbance significantly more than PCPs alone while PCPs assessed depression and advance care planning more often. PCP involvement improved adherence throughout. Depression, apathy, and advance care planning metric adherence were significantly impacted by age and/or visit frequency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A team-based approach to quality metric adherence may reduce the burden on providers and improve care for PWPs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112525000416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112525000416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality Measure Adherence in Parkinson’s Disease: A Single Center Experience***Parkinson’s Disease Quality Measures
Background
Patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PWPs) often have both motor and non-motor manifestations requiring specialized care. Neurologists typically lead their care; however, the population of PWPs is exceeding the supply of neurologists. Primary care providers (PCPs) may need to contribute to improve care.
Objective
To measure American Academy of Neurology quality metric (QM) adherence between neurologists and PCPs for PWPs.
Methods
We conducted a single-center retrospective, descriptive analysis assessing 14 QMs in the past year for PWPs established with a neurologist and PCP. McNemar’s test assessed statistical differences between groups. Logistic regression models explored the impact of age, sex, and visit frequency on QM adherence
Results
On average, 8.9 QMs were addressed among 89 PWPs. Motor complications, rehabilitation referrals, falls, and autonomic dysfunction were the most often addressed while apathy and impulse control disorder were the least. Neurologists alone met motor complications, psychosis, impulse control disorder, and sleep disturbance significantly more than PCPs alone while PCPs assessed depression and advance care planning more often. PCP involvement improved adherence throughout. Depression, apathy, and advance care planning metric adherence were significantly impacted by age and/or visit frequency.
Conclusions
A team-based approach to quality metric adherence may reduce the burden on providers and improve care for PWPs.