风湿性肌肉骨骼疾病手部成像的算法方法:系统文献综述

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Laetitia Perronne , Marie Binvignat , Nathan Foulquier , Alain Saraux , Jean Denis Laredo , Constance de Margerie-Mellon , Laure Fournier , Jérémie Sellam
{"title":"风湿性肌肉骨骼疾病手部成像的算法方法:系统文献综述","authors":"Laetitia Perronne ,&nbsp;Marie Binvignat ,&nbsp;Nathan Foulquier ,&nbsp;Alain Saraux ,&nbsp;Jean Denis Laredo ,&nbsp;Constance de Margerie-Mellon ,&nbsp;Laure Fournier ,&nbsp;Jérémie Sellam","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in hand imaging of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). The review evaluates ML algorithms, imaging modalities, patient populations, validation methods, and areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms and keywords. The search, executed in October 2024, was conducted manually and with BiBot, an AI-based tool for literature reviews. Studies focusing on ML applications in osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 400 initially identified studies, 32 met the inclusion criteria. RA was the most studied disease (88 %), followed by OA (22 %) and PsA (9 %). Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most frequently used algorithms (50 %). Standard radiographs (59 %) were the predominant imaging modality, followed by MRI (16 %). Despite recommendations for ML studies, external validation was conducted in only 15 % of studies, and just 6 % of datasets were publicly available. Interpretability tools were employed in 28 % of studies to enhance clinical relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ML has significant potential to improve diagnostics and disease management in hand imaging of RMDs. However, key challenges remain, including the need for increased external validation, broader disease coverage (OA and PsA), and improved data-sharing practices to enhance reproducibility and clinical adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 152750"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic approaches in hand imaging for rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Laetitia Perronne ,&nbsp;Marie Binvignat ,&nbsp;Nathan Foulquier ,&nbsp;Alain Saraux ,&nbsp;Jean Denis Laredo ,&nbsp;Constance de Margerie-Mellon ,&nbsp;Laure Fournier ,&nbsp;Jérémie Sellam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in hand imaging of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). The review evaluates ML algorithms, imaging modalities, patient populations, validation methods, and areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms and keywords. The search, executed in October 2024, was conducted manually and with BiBot, an AI-based tool for literature reviews. Studies focusing on ML applications in osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 400 initially identified studies, 32 met the inclusion criteria. RA was the most studied disease (88 %), followed by OA (22 %) and PsA (9 %). Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most frequently used algorithms (50 %). Standard radiographs (59 %) were the predominant imaging modality, followed by MRI (16 %). Despite recommendations for ML studies, external validation was conducted in only 15 % of studies, and just 6 % of datasets were publicly available. Interpretability tools were employed in 28 % of studies to enhance clinical relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ML has significant potential to improve diagnostics and disease management in hand imaging of RMDs. However, key challenges remain, including the need for increased external validation, broader disease coverage (OA and PsA), and improved data-sharing practices to enhance reproducibility and clinical adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001210\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统的文献综述提供了机器学习(ML)在风湿性肌肉骨骼疾病(RMDs)手部成像中的应用的全面概述。该综述评估了机器学习算法、成像方式、患者群体、验证方法和需要改进的领域。方法按照PRISMA指南进行审查,并在PROSPERO注册。使用相关的MeSH术语和关键字从PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus检索文章。这项搜索于2024年10月进行,是通过人工智能文献综述工具BiBot进行的。研究集中于ML在骨关节炎(OA)、类风湿性关节炎(RA)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)中的应用。结果在最初确定的400项研究中,32项符合纳入标准。RA是研究最多的疾病(88%),其次是OA(22%)和PsA(9%)。卷积神经网络(cnn)是最常用的算法(50%)。标准x线片(59%)是主要的成像方式,其次是MRI(16%)。尽管有ML研究的推荐,但只有15%的研究进行了外部验证,只有6%的数据集是公开可用的。28%的研究采用可解释性工具来提高临床相关性。结论ml在RMDs的手部影像学诊断和疾病管理方面具有重要的应用价值。然而,主要挑战仍然存在,包括需要增加外部验证,更广泛的疾病覆盖范围(OA和PsA),以及改进数据共享实践以提高可重复性和临床采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Algorithmic approaches in hand imaging for rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic literature review

Algorithmic approaches in hand imaging for rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic literature review

Objective

This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in hand imaging of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). The review evaluates ML algorithms, imaging modalities, patient populations, validation methods, and areas for improvement.

Methods

The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms and keywords. The search, executed in October 2024, was conducted manually and with BiBot, an AI-based tool for literature reviews. Studies focusing on ML applications in osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were included.

Results

From 400 initially identified studies, 32 met the inclusion criteria. RA was the most studied disease (88 %), followed by OA (22 %) and PsA (9 %). Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most frequently used algorithms (50 %). Standard radiographs (59 %) were the predominant imaging modality, followed by MRI (16 %). Despite recommendations for ML studies, external validation was conducted in only 15 % of studies, and just 6 % of datasets were publicly available. Interpretability tools were employed in 28 % of studies to enhance clinical relevance.

Conclusion

ML has significant potential to improve diagnostics and disease management in hand imaging of RMDs. However, key challenges remain, including the need for increased external validation, broader disease coverage (OA and PsA), and improved data-sharing practices to enhance reproducibility and clinical adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信