基于无线传感技术的人火分类方法

IF 8.9 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Liangliang Lou;Jiaqian Bao;Yike Wang;Kai Zhao;Yong Xiong;Shiqing Zhang
{"title":"基于无线传感技术的人火分类方法","authors":"Liangliang Lou;Jiaqian Bao;Yike Wang;Kai Zhao;Yong Xiong;Shiqing Zhang","doi":"10.1109/JIOT.2025.3567118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-rise fires pose significant risks due to their complex structures and high population density, making timely and effective detection methods essential. Compared to traditional sensor- or camera-based detection methods, wireless sensing-based human-fire classification (HFC) methods offer significant cost-effectiveness advantages. While Channel State Information (CSI) provides more detailed and accurate channel data compared to Received Signal Strength (RSS), its acquisition and processing are more challenging. On the other hand, RSS-based methods are easier to implement and more cost-effective. Therefore, selecting appropriate methods for specific scenarios is crucial to achieving a balance between performance and cost-effectiveness. To this end, this article proposes an innovative method called Wi-HFC, which leverages deep learning to evaluate the performance of RSS and CSI in various HFC tasks. Specifically, a dataset of RSS and CSI data from five classification tasks in real fire scenarios was collected and evaluated using a custom-designed convolutional neural network-based deep learning model. Experimental results indicate that RSS is a cost-effective choice for short distances or simple environments, whereas CSI demonstrates significant advantages in scenarios requiring higher accuracy and involving greater environmental complexity. Furthermore, the developed dataset is publicly available at <uri>https://github.com/T-bjq/Wi-HFC-dataset</uri>, providing resources for further research.","PeriodicalId":54347,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Internet of Things Journal","volume":"12 14","pages":"28702-28711"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human-Fire Classification Method Based on Wireless Sensing Technology\",\"authors\":\"Liangliang Lou;Jiaqian Bao;Yike Wang;Kai Zhao;Yong Xiong;Shiqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JIOT.2025.3567118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High-rise fires pose significant risks due to their complex structures and high population density, making timely and effective detection methods essential. Compared to traditional sensor- or camera-based detection methods, wireless sensing-based human-fire classification (HFC) methods offer significant cost-effectiveness advantages. While Channel State Information (CSI) provides more detailed and accurate channel data compared to Received Signal Strength (RSS), its acquisition and processing are more challenging. On the other hand, RSS-based methods are easier to implement and more cost-effective. Therefore, selecting appropriate methods for specific scenarios is crucial to achieving a balance between performance and cost-effectiveness. To this end, this article proposes an innovative method called Wi-HFC, which leverages deep learning to evaluate the performance of RSS and CSI in various HFC tasks. Specifically, a dataset of RSS and CSI data from five classification tasks in real fire scenarios was collected and evaluated using a custom-designed convolutional neural network-based deep learning model. Experimental results indicate that RSS is a cost-effective choice for short distances or simple environments, whereas CSI demonstrates significant advantages in scenarios requiring higher accuracy and involving greater environmental complexity. Furthermore, the developed dataset is publicly available at <uri>https://github.com/T-bjq/Wi-HFC-dataset</uri>, providing resources for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Internet of Things Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 14\",\"pages\":\"28702-28711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Internet of Things Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10994507/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Internet of Things Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10994507/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高层建筑结构复杂,人口密度大,火灾危险性大,及时有效的火灾检测方法至关重要。与传统的基于传感器或摄像机的检测方法相比,基于无线传感的人火分类(HFC)方法具有显著的成本效益优势。与接收信号强度(RSS)相比,信道状态信息(CSI)提供了更详细和准确的信道数据,但其获取和处理更具挑战性。另一方面,基于rss的方法更容易实现并且更具成本效益。因此,为特定场景选择适当的方法对于实现性能和成本效益之间的平衡至关重要。为此,本文提出了一种称为Wi-HFC的创新方法,该方法利用深度学习来评估RSS和CSI在各种HFC任务中的性能。具体来说,收集了真实火灾场景中五个分类任务的RSS和CSI数据集,并使用定制设计的基于卷积神经网络的深度学习模型进行了评估。实验结果表明,在短距离或简单环境中,RSS是一种经济有效的选择,而CSI在需要更高精度和更大环境复杂性的情况下表现出显著优势。此外,开发的数据集可在https://github.com/T-bjq/Wi-HFC-dataset上公开获取,为进一步研究提供资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human-Fire Classification Method Based on Wireless Sensing Technology
High-rise fires pose significant risks due to their complex structures and high population density, making timely and effective detection methods essential. Compared to traditional sensor- or camera-based detection methods, wireless sensing-based human-fire classification (HFC) methods offer significant cost-effectiveness advantages. While Channel State Information (CSI) provides more detailed and accurate channel data compared to Received Signal Strength (RSS), its acquisition and processing are more challenging. On the other hand, RSS-based methods are easier to implement and more cost-effective. Therefore, selecting appropriate methods for specific scenarios is crucial to achieving a balance between performance and cost-effectiveness. To this end, this article proposes an innovative method called Wi-HFC, which leverages deep learning to evaluate the performance of RSS and CSI in various HFC tasks. Specifically, a dataset of RSS and CSI data from five classification tasks in real fire scenarios was collected and evaluated using a custom-designed convolutional neural network-based deep learning model. Experimental results indicate that RSS is a cost-effective choice for short distances or simple environments, whereas CSI demonstrates significant advantages in scenarios requiring higher accuracy and involving greater environmental complexity. Furthermore, the developed dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/T-bjq/Wi-HFC-dataset, providing resources for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
IEEE Internet of Things Journal Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1982
期刊介绍: The EEE Internet of Things (IoT) Journal publishes articles and review articles covering various aspects of IoT, including IoT system architecture, IoT enabling technologies, IoT communication and networking protocols such as network coding, and IoT services and applications. Topics encompass IoT's impacts on sensor technologies, big data management, and future internet design for applications like smart cities and smart homes. Fields of interest include IoT architecture such as things-centric, data-centric, service-oriented IoT architecture; IoT enabling technologies and systematic integration such as sensor technologies, big sensor data management, and future Internet design for IoT; IoT services, applications, and test-beds such as IoT service middleware, IoT application programming interface (API), IoT application design, and IoT trials/experiments; IoT standardization activities and technology development in different standard development organizations (SDO) such as IEEE, IETF, ITU, 3GPP, ETSI, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信