Gerard Gallardo i Peres, Philippa J. Mason, Richard C. Ghail
{"title":"金星上潜在地形异常的地图","authors":"Gerard Gallardo i Peres, Philippa J. Mason, Richard C. Ghail","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The most recent, highest-resolution, global estimate of the topography of Venus is the Global Topographic Data Record (GTDR), a gridded representation of the altimetry data from the Magellan space mission. This product is impaired by an occasional pattern; a series of visually striking topographic “pits,” often referred to as spuriously low values, which in many cases might be generating false topographic signatures. These generally arise from the incorrect identification of secondary, delayed power peaks in the individual altimeter records, which causes local topographic underestimations. There are many such “pits” across the GTDR, and they can lead to misinterpretation of geomorphological features. In this study, we describe GTDR data errors in detail and the situations in which they occur, and propose a method to classify spuriously low values across the entire product as potential anomalies. The method is based on the computation of the local altimeter ambiguity height around each pixel, modulated by an estimate of the relative elevation uncertainty between the pixel and the neighboring topography. We generate global maps of the potential anomalies, and find that up to 2.865% of the original product is impaired by them. They are concentrated in particular around rift systems and summit areas at low latitudes, and can be used to identify areas that would benefit from reprocessing the altimeter records. We argue that GTDR-supported geomorphological interpretations of surface features on Venus, in particular of <i>chasmata</i>, are susceptible to depth overestimation and cross-section distortion due to the accumulation of potential topographic anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Map of Potential Topographic Anomalies on Venus\",\"authors\":\"Gerard Gallardo i Peres, Philippa J. Mason, Richard C. Ghail\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The most recent, highest-resolution, global estimate of the topography of Venus is the Global Topographic Data Record (GTDR), a gridded representation of the altimetry data from the Magellan space mission. This product is impaired by an occasional pattern; a series of visually striking topographic “pits,” often referred to as spuriously low values, which in many cases might be generating false topographic signatures. These generally arise from the incorrect identification of secondary, delayed power peaks in the individual altimeter records, which causes local topographic underestimations. There are many such “pits” across the GTDR, and they can lead to misinterpretation of geomorphological features. In this study, we describe GTDR data errors in detail and the situations in which they occur, and propose a method to classify spuriously low values across the entire product as potential anomalies. The method is based on the computation of the local altimeter ambiguity height around each pixel, modulated by an estimate of the relative elevation uncertainty between the pixel and the neighboring topography. We generate global maps of the potential anomalies, and find that up to 2.865% of the original product is impaired by them. They are concentrated in particular around rift systems and summit areas at low latitudes, and can be used to identify areas that would benefit from reprocessing the altimeter records. We argue that GTDR-supported geomorphological interpretations of surface features on Venus, in particular of <i>chasmata</i>, are susceptible to depth overestimation and cross-section distortion due to the accumulation of potential topographic anomalies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008778\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008778\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008778","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The most recent, highest-resolution, global estimate of the topography of Venus is the Global Topographic Data Record (GTDR), a gridded representation of the altimetry data from the Magellan space mission. This product is impaired by an occasional pattern; a series of visually striking topographic “pits,” often referred to as spuriously low values, which in many cases might be generating false topographic signatures. These generally arise from the incorrect identification of secondary, delayed power peaks in the individual altimeter records, which causes local topographic underestimations. There are many such “pits” across the GTDR, and they can lead to misinterpretation of geomorphological features. In this study, we describe GTDR data errors in detail and the situations in which they occur, and propose a method to classify spuriously low values across the entire product as potential anomalies. The method is based on the computation of the local altimeter ambiguity height around each pixel, modulated by an estimate of the relative elevation uncertainty between the pixel and the neighboring topography. We generate global maps of the potential anomalies, and find that up to 2.865% of the original product is impaired by them. They are concentrated in particular around rift systems and summit areas at low latitudes, and can be used to identify areas that would benefit from reprocessing the altimeter records. We argue that GTDR-supported geomorphological interpretations of surface features on Venus, in particular of chasmata, are susceptible to depth overestimation and cross-section distortion due to the accumulation of potential topographic anomalies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.