S.E. Harkins , A.K. Hazi , J. Guglielminotti , R. Landau , V. Barcelona
{"title":"美国分娩疼痛管理中的歧视、种族主义和偏见:研究和临床护理的范围回顾和方向","authors":"S.E. Harkins , A.K. Hazi , J. Guglielminotti , R. Landau , V. Barcelona","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric analgesia care persist in the United States. There is a paucity of validated tools to measure how discrimination, racism, and bias affect obstetric anesthesia care. As a result, little is known about how racism and other forms of discrimination impact pain management during childbirth. In this scoping review, we evaluated 11 studies that quantitatively measured or qualitatively described experiences of discrimination, racism, or bias in childbirth pain management among birthing people in the United States. Studies focused on birthing people with marginalized identities due to race and ethnicity, disability status, history of opioid use disorder, and health insurance status. We provide nine recommendations for research and 14 recommendations for clinical practice to mitigate the impact of interpersonal, institutional, and structural discrimination in obstetric anesthesia care. Future research should prioritize quantitative analyses between structural discrimination and childbirth pain management, and employ an intersectional approach to improve care for birthing people with multiple marginalized identities. Clinical practice recommendations include developing rapport and trust with birthing people before labor analgesia is needed, diversifying the labor and delivery workforce, establishing patient-family advisory councils, and encouraging professional societies to advocate for equitable perinatal health policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination, racism, and bias in childbirth pain management in the United States: a scoping review and directions for research and clinical care\",\"authors\":\"S.E. Harkins , A.K. Hazi , J. Guglielminotti , R. Landau , V. Barcelona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric analgesia care persist in the United States. There is a paucity of validated tools to measure how discrimination, racism, and bias affect obstetric anesthesia care. As a result, little is known about how racism and other forms of discrimination impact pain management during childbirth. In this scoping review, we evaluated 11 studies that quantitatively measured or qualitatively described experiences of discrimination, racism, or bias in childbirth pain management among birthing people in the United States. Studies focused on birthing people with marginalized identities due to race and ethnicity, disability status, history of opioid use disorder, and health insurance status. We provide nine recommendations for research and 14 recommendations for clinical practice to mitigate the impact of interpersonal, institutional, and structural discrimination in obstetric anesthesia care. Future research should prioritize quantitative analyses between structural discrimination and childbirth pain management, and employ an intersectional approach to improve care for birthing people with multiple marginalized identities. Clinical practice recommendations include developing rapport and trust with birthing people before labor analgesia is needed, diversifying the labor and delivery workforce, establishing patient-family advisory councils, and encouraging professional societies to advocate for equitable perinatal health policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrimination, racism, and bias in childbirth pain management in the United States: a scoping review and directions for research and clinical care
Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric analgesia care persist in the United States. There is a paucity of validated tools to measure how discrimination, racism, and bias affect obstetric anesthesia care. As a result, little is known about how racism and other forms of discrimination impact pain management during childbirth. In this scoping review, we evaluated 11 studies that quantitatively measured or qualitatively described experiences of discrimination, racism, or bias in childbirth pain management among birthing people in the United States. Studies focused on birthing people with marginalized identities due to race and ethnicity, disability status, history of opioid use disorder, and health insurance status. We provide nine recommendations for research and 14 recommendations for clinical practice to mitigate the impact of interpersonal, institutional, and structural discrimination in obstetric anesthesia care. Future research should prioritize quantitative analyses between structural discrimination and childbirth pain management, and employ an intersectional approach to improve care for birthing people with multiple marginalized identities. Clinical practice recommendations include developing rapport and trust with birthing people before labor analgesia is needed, diversifying the labor and delivery workforce, establishing patient-family advisory councils, and encouraging professional societies to advocate for equitable perinatal health policies.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.