生物经济创新及其区域嵌入性:来自德国旗舰创新定性多案例研究的结果

Michael P. Schlaile , Jonathan Friedrich , Luise Porst , Jana Zscheischler
{"title":"生物经济创新及其区域嵌入性:来自德国旗舰创新定性多案例研究的结果","authors":"Michael P. Schlaile ,&nbsp;Jonathan Friedrich ,&nbsp;Luise Porst ,&nbsp;Jana Zscheischler","doi":"10.1016/j.peg.2025.100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores the regional embeddedness of bioeconomy innovations in Germany, focusing on “flagship” innovation projects that exemplify the challenges and opportunities of systemic changes towards bioeconomies. While bioeconomies have been promoted as solutions to global challenges and opportunities for sustainable regional development, there are ongoing debates about the actual benefits of bioeconomies. These debates result not least from diverging visions of both bioeconomy and innovation. The concept of regional embeddedness shows promise for addressing such issues but needs empirical refinement and conceptual substantiation. Therefore, our study investigates how innovators perceive their bioeconomy innovations to be regionally embedded and which regional challenges and opportunities they identify, using a qualitative multiple-case study approach. More precisely, we report the findings from 16 interviews with experts involved in “flagship” innovations in the German bioeconomy. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of bioeconomy visions and corresponding innovations and confirm the relevance of different types of proximity. Moreover, higher education institutions and research institutes are found to play a key role in driving bioeconomy innovations, which may, however, contribute to regional differences in capacities and capabilities for sustainable bioeconomy innovations and transitions. Building on our findings, we propose a first conceptual framework incorporating both procedural and effectual dimensions of regional embeddedness. Generally, our article provides insights for policymakers, innovators, and other scholars interested in better understanding and governing bioeconomies through regionally embedded innovation processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101047,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Economic Geography","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioeconomy innovations and their regional embeddedness: Results from a qualitative multiple-case study on German flagship innovations\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Schlaile ,&nbsp;Jonathan Friedrich ,&nbsp;Luise Porst ,&nbsp;Jana Zscheischler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.peg.2025.100044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article explores the regional embeddedness of bioeconomy innovations in Germany, focusing on “flagship” innovation projects that exemplify the challenges and opportunities of systemic changes towards bioeconomies. While bioeconomies have been promoted as solutions to global challenges and opportunities for sustainable regional development, there are ongoing debates about the actual benefits of bioeconomies. These debates result not least from diverging visions of both bioeconomy and innovation. The concept of regional embeddedness shows promise for addressing such issues but needs empirical refinement and conceptual substantiation. Therefore, our study investigates how innovators perceive their bioeconomy innovations to be regionally embedded and which regional challenges and opportunities they identify, using a qualitative multiple-case study approach. More precisely, we report the findings from 16 interviews with experts involved in “flagship” innovations in the German bioeconomy. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of bioeconomy visions and corresponding innovations and confirm the relevance of different types of proximity. Moreover, higher education institutions and research institutes are found to play a key role in driving bioeconomy innovations, which may, however, contribute to regional differences in capacities and capabilities for sustainable bioeconomy innovations and transitions. Building on our findings, we propose a first conceptual framework incorporating both procedural and effectual dimensions of regional embeddedness. Generally, our article provides insights for policymakers, innovators, and other scholars interested in better understanding and governing bioeconomies through regionally embedded innovation processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Economic Geography\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Economic Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949694225000094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949694225000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了德国生物经济创新的区域嵌入性,重点关注“旗舰”创新项目,这些项目体现了生物经济系统性变革的挑战和机遇。虽然生物经济已被推广为解决全球挑战和可持续区域发展机遇的解决方案,但关于生物经济的实际效益仍存在争论。这些争论主要源于对生物经济和创新的不同看法。区域嵌入性的概念显示了解决这些问题的希望,但需要经验的改进和概念的证实。因此,我们的研究采用定性的多案例研究方法,调查了创新者如何看待他们的生物经济创新具有区域嵌入性,以及他们发现了哪些区域挑战和机遇。更准确地说,我们报告了对参与德国生物经济“旗舰”创新的专家进行的16次采访的结果。我们的研究结果强调了生物经济愿景和相应创新的异质性,并证实了不同类型的接近性的相关性。此外,高等教育机构和研究机构在推动生物经济创新方面发挥着关键作用,但这可能会导致可持续生物经济创新和转型能力的区域差异。基于我们的发现,我们提出了第一个包含区域嵌入性的程序和有效维度的概念框架。总的来说,我们的文章为决策者、创新者和其他对通过区域嵌入式创新过程更好地理解和管理生物经济感兴趣的学者提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioeconomy innovations and their regional embeddedness: Results from a qualitative multiple-case study on German flagship innovations
This article explores the regional embeddedness of bioeconomy innovations in Germany, focusing on “flagship” innovation projects that exemplify the challenges and opportunities of systemic changes towards bioeconomies. While bioeconomies have been promoted as solutions to global challenges and opportunities for sustainable regional development, there are ongoing debates about the actual benefits of bioeconomies. These debates result not least from diverging visions of both bioeconomy and innovation. The concept of regional embeddedness shows promise for addressing such issues but needs empirical refinement and conceptual substantiation. Therefore, our study investigates how innovators perceive their bioeconomy innovations to be regionally embedded and which regional challenges and opportunities they identify, using a qualitative multiple-case study approach. More precisely, we report the findings from 16 interviews with experts involved in “flagship” innovations in the German bioeconomy. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of bioeconomy visions and corresponding innovations and confirm the relevance of different types of proximity. Moreover, higher education institutions and research institutes are found to play a key role in driving bioeconomy innovations, which may, however, contribute to regional differences in capacities and capabilities for sustainable bioeconomy innovations and transitions. Building on our findings, we propose a first conceptual framework incorporating both procedural and effectual dimensions of regional embeddedness. Generally, our article provides insights for policymakers, innovators, and other scholars interested in better understanding and governing bioeconomies through regionally embedded innovation processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信