Romy Rahhal, Paul Sakr, Rana Bachir, Mazen El Sayed
{"title":"美国创伤中心警察与地面救护车运送钝性创伤患者的结果","authors":"Romy Rahhal, Paul Sakr, Rana Bachir, Mazen El Sayed","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Blunt injuries constitute a major cause of death in the United States. Regionalization in trauma systems improves patients' survival and outcomes. Limited data exist on the impact of mode of transport in regionalized trauma systems. This study examines the association between trauma designation levels and survival to hospital discharge of patients with blunt trauma transported by police or ground ambulance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective-matched cohort study used the 2017 National Trauma Data Bank dataset. Adult blunt trauma patients transported by police were identified and matched (one-to-four) to those transported by ground ambulance. Demographic characteristics, injury, and clinical data were described and compared according to trauma designation levels. The survival rate was determined by the transport mode and/or the trauma designation levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 5316 blunt trauma patients were included. Mean age was 41.8 (±16.5) years, and most were males (81.8%). Most patients were transported to Level I centers and were more likely to be admitted (91.1%) compared to those transported to level II and level III trauma centers (87.5%). They also had a lower survival rate compared with the latter group ((98.7%) vs. (99.7%), <i>p</i> = 0.001). Survival rates were similar when comparing patients by mode of transport (<i>p</i> = 0.785). This remained unchanged after stratifying by the trauma designation levels (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Adult patients with blunt trauma transported by police or ground ambulance had similar survival across different trauma level centers. Increased police involvement in the transport of blunt trauma patients is recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of blunt trauma patients in police versus ground ambulance transport across US trauma centers\",\"authors\":\"Romy Rahhal, Paul Sakr, Rana Bachir, Mazen El Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ams2.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Blunt injuries constitute a major cause of death in the United States. Regionalization in trauma systems improves patients' survival and outcomes. Limited data exist on the impact of mode of transport in regionalized trauma systems. This study examines the association between trauma designation levels and survival to hospital discharge of patients with blunt trauma transported by police or ground ambulance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective-matched cohort study used the 2017 National Trauma Data Bank dataset. Adult blunt trauma patients transported by police were identified and matched (one-to-four) to those transported by ground ambulance. Demographic characteristics, injury, and clinical data were described and compared according to trauma designation levels. The survival rate was determined by the transport mode and/or the trauma designation levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 5316 blunt trauma patients were included. Mean age was 41.8 (±16.5) years, and most were males (81.8%). Most patients were transported to Level I centers and were more likely to be admitted (91.1%) compared to those transported to level II and level III trauma centers (87.5%). They also had a lower survival rate compared with the latter group ((98.7%) vs. (99.7%), <i>p</i> = 0.001). Survival rates were similar when comparing patients by mode of transport (<i>p</i> = 0.785). This remained unchanged after stratifying by the trauma designation levels (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adult patients with blunt trauma transported by police or ground ambulance had similar survival across different trauma level centers. Increased police involvement in the transport of blunt trauma patients is recommended.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70061\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在美国,钝器伤害是造成死亡的主要原因。创伤系统的区域化改善了患者的生存和预后。关于运输方式对区域化创伤系统影响的数据有限。本研究探讨了由警察或地面救护车运送的钝性创伤患者的创伤指定水平与存活至出院之间的关系。方法本回顾性匹配队列研究使用2017年国家创伤数据库数据集。由警察运送的成年钝性创伤患者被识别并与由地面救护车运送的患者进行匹配(1 - 4)。根据创伤指定水平描述和比较人口统计学特征、损伤和临床数据。生存率取决于运送方式和/或创伤等级。结果共纳入5316例钝性创伤患者。平均年龄41.8(±16.5)岁,以男性居多(81.8%)。大多数患者被送往一级创伤中心,与送往二级和三级创伤中心的患者(87.5%)相比,住院的可能性更高(91.1%)。与后者相比,前者的生存率也较低(98.7% vs. 99.7%, p = 0.001)。不同运输方式的患者生存率相似(p = 0.785)。在按创伤指定水平分层后,这一结果保持不变(p > 0.05)。结论由警察或地面救护车运送的成年钝性创伤患者在不同创伤级别中心的生存率相似。建议增加警察参与运送钝性创伤患者。
Outcomes of blunt trauma patients in police versus ground ambulance transport across US trauma centers
Aim
Blunt injuries constitute a major cause of death in the United States. Regionalization in trauma systems improves patients' survival and outcomes. Limited data exist on the impact of mode of transport in regionalized trauma systems. This study examines the association between trauma designation levels and survival to hospital discharge of patients with blunt trauma transported by police or ground ambulance.
Methods
This retrospective-matched cohort study used the 2017 National Trauma Data Bank dataset. Adult blunt trauma patients transported by police were identified and matched (one-to-four) to those transported by ground ambulance. Demographic characteristics, injury, and clinical data were described and compared according to trauma designation levels. The survival rate was determined by the transport mode and/or the trauma designation levels.
Results
A total of 5316 blunt trauma patients were included. Mean age was 41.8 (±16.5) years, and most were males (81.8%). Most patients were transported to Level I centers and were more likely to be admitted (91.1%) compared to those transported to level II and level III trauma centers (87.5%). They also had a lower survival rate compared with the latter group ((98.7%) vs. (99.7%), p = 0.001). Survival rates were similar when comparing patients by mode of transport (p = 0.785). This remained unchanged after stratifying by the trauma designation levels (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Adult patients with blunt trauma transported by police or ground ambulance had similar survival across different trauma level centers. Increased police involvement in the transport of blunt trauma patients is recommended.