第二起“幽灵网络”诉讼被提交给纽约联邦法院

Mental Health Weekly Pub Date : 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1002/mhw.34444

Gary Enos

{"title":"第二起“幽灵网络”诉讼被提交给纽约联邦法院","authors":"Gary Enos","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Saying the mental health benefits manager for a New York government employee health plan deceptively issued an inaccurate provider directory in order to boost profits, attorneys for three plaintiffs have sued the company in federal court. The lawsuit against Carelon Behavioral Health is the second federal legal challenge to the practice of publishing mental health “ghost networks” in the past six months.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"35 19","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A second ‘ghost network’ challenge is filed in federal court in New York\",\"authors\":\"Gary Enos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhw.34444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Saying the mental health benefits manager for a New York government employee health plan deceptively issued an inaccurate provider directory in order to boost profits, attorneys for three plaintiffs have sued the company in federal court. The lawsuit against Carelon Behavioral Health is the second federal legal challenge to the practice of publishing mental health “ghost networks” in the past six months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"volume\":\"35 19\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

三名原告的律师称，纽约政府雇员健康计划的精神健康福利经理为了增加利润，欺骗性地发布了一份不准确的供应商目录，并将该公司告上联邦法院。针对Carelon行为健康的诉讼是过去6个月来第二次针对发布精神健康“幽灵网络”的联邦法律挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A second ‘ghost network’ challenge is filed in federal court in New York

Saying the mental health benefits manager for a New York government employee health plan deceptively issued an inaccurate provider directory in order to boost profits, attorneys for three plaintiffs have sued the company in federal court. The lawsuit against Carelon Behavioral Health is the second federal legal challenge to the practice of publishing mental health “ghost networks” in the past six months.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Mental Health Weekly

自引率

0.00%

发文量