Jia En Chan, Suresh Shanmugham, Suresh Kumar, Yeong Yeh Lee, Siew Mooi Ching, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Sajesh K. Veettil
{"title":"胃肠道癌症的化学预防:随机对照试验和队列研究荟萃分析综述","authors":"Jia En Chan, Suresh Shanmugham, Suresh Kumar, Yeong Yeh Lee, Siew Mooi Ching, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Sajesh K. Veettil","doi":"10.1111/cts.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several meta-analyses have investigated the association between chemopreventive agents (CPAs) and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers, but syntheses of the quality of evidence in aggregate are lacking. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that examine inverse associations between CPAs and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers or any premalignant conditions. Summary effect sizes from random-effects models, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval, small-study effect, excess significance, and credibility ceilings were devised to classify the credibility of evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies, whereas the GRADE approach was used for meta-analyses of RCTs. From 20,296 publications, 577 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, and 69 articles that provided 194 unique meta-analyses were included. Among meta-analyses of RCTs (<i>N</i> = 93), 26 reached statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Seven inverse associations were graded as either high quality (celecoxib and colorectal adenomas, (<i>N</i> = 4)) or moderate (aspirin and colorectal adenomas, (<i>N</i> = 2) and <i>H-pylori</i> eradication and gastric cancer (<i>N</i> = 1)). Among meta-analyses of cohort studies (<i>N</i> = 101), 60 reached statistical significance. Four inverse associations were graded as either convincing (antivirals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); <i>N</i> = 1) or highly suggestive (aspirin with HCC (<i>N</i> = 2) and colorectal cancer (<i>N</i> = 1)). This review suggests that the associations with the most consistent empirical evidence were confined to those targeting the well-established risk factors of gastrointestinal cancer progression. Despite the limited established evidence, the inverse associations observed between metformin and colorectal, esophageal, and gastric cancers, as well as between statins and HCC and gastric cancer, merit further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70235","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemoprevention of Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies\",\"authors\":\"Jia En Chan, Suresh Shanmugham, Suresh Kumar, Yeong Yeh Lee, Siew Mooi Ching, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Sajesh K. Veettil\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Several meta-analyses have investigated the association between chemopreventive agents (CPAs) and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers, but syntheses of the quality of evidence in aggregate are lacking. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that examine inverse associations between CPAs and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers or any premalignant conditions. Summary effect sizes from random-effects models, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval, small-study effect, excess significance, and credibility ceilings were devised to classify the credibility of evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies, whereas the GRADE approach was used for meta-analyses of RCTs. From 20,296 publications, 577 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, and 69 articles that provided 194 unique meta-analyses were included. Among meta-analyses of RCTs (<i>N</i> = 93), 26 reached statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Seven inverse associations were graded as either high quality (celecoxib and colorectal adenomas, (<i>N</i> = 4)) or moderate (aspirin and colorectal adenomas, (<i>N</i> = 2) and <i>H-pylori</i> eradication and gastric cancer (<i>N</i> = 1)). Among meta-analyses of cohort studies (<i>N</i> = 101), 60 reached statistical significance. Four inverse associations were graded as either convincing (antivirals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); <i>N</i> = 1) or highly suggestive (aspirin with HCC (<i>N</i> = 2) and colorectal cancer (<i>N</i> = 1)). This review suggests that the associations with the most consistent empirical evidence were confined to those targeting the well-established risk factors of gastrointestinal cancer progression. Despite the limited established evidence, the inverse associations observed between metformin and colorectal, esophageal, and gastric cancers, as well as between statins and HCC and gastric cancer, merit further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70235\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70235\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chemoprevention of Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
Several meta-analyses have investigated the association between chemopreventive agents (CPAs) and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers, but syntheses of the quality of evidence in aggregate are lacking. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that examine inverse associations between CPAs and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers or any premalignant conditions. Summary effect sizes from random-effects models, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval, small-study effect, excess significance, and credibility ceilings were devised to classify the credibility of evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies, whereas the GRADE approach was used for meta-analyses of RCTs. From 20,296 publications, 577 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, and 69 articles that provided 194 unique meta-analyses were included. Among meta-analyses of RCTs (N = 93), 26 reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). Seven inverse associations were graded as either high quality (celecoxib and colorectal adenomas, (N = 4)) or moderate (aspirin and colorectal adenomas, (N = 2) and H-pylori eradication and gastric cancer (N = 1)). Among meta-analyses of cohort studies (N = 101), 60 reached statistical significance. Four inverse associations were graded as either convincing (antivirals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); N = 1) or highly suggestive (aspirin with HCC (N = 2) and colorectal cancer (N = 1)). This review suggests that the associations with the most consistent empirical evidence were confined to those targeting the well-established risk factors of gastrointestinal cancer progression. Despite the limited established evidence, the inverse associations observed between metformin and colorectal, esophageal, and gastric cancers, as well as between statins and HCC and gastric cancer, merit further research.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.