评估传统和非传统教育资源在现场超声培训中的作用:教育者偏好和实践的横断面调查

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Arthur Broadstock MD, Annahieta Kalantari DO, MEd, Almaz S. Dessie MD, Al’ai Alvarez MD, Resa E. Lewiss MD, Josie Acuna MD, Anthony Weekes MD, MSc, Kaylah Maloney MD, Uwe Stolz PhD, MPH, Lori Stolz MD, Aalap Shah MD
{"title":"评估传统和非传统教育资源在现场超声培训中的作用:教育者偏好和实践的横断面调查","authors":"Arthur Broadstock MD,&nbsp;Annahieta Kalantari DO, MEd,&nbsp;Almaz S. Dessie MD,&nbsp;Al’ai Alvarez MD,&nbsp;Resa E. Lewiss MD,&nbsp;Josie Acuna MD,&nbsp;Anthony Weekes MD, MSc,&nbsp;Kaylah Maloney MD,&nbsp;Uwe Stolz PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Lori Stolz MD,&nbsp;Aalap Shah MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recently, nontraditional educational resources like podcasts, blogs, and online media have gained prominence in medical education and are abundant within the field of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). However, the extent to which POCUS educators utilize online resources compared to traditional resources, like textbooks, journal articles, and in-person workshops, is unknown. We aim to define which types of educational resources are used and preferred by POCUS educators to teach trainees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An expert working group developed a survey aimed to characterize the types of materials used by POCUS educators and their perceived importance on a 6-point forced ranking scale. We administered the survey to POCUS educators at the 2023 Society for Clinical Ultrasound Fellowships conference. Responses were analyzed using random-effects regression analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two participants completed the questionnaire. In-person workshops (mean importance 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8–5.4) and online media (mean importance 4.8, 95% CI 4.4–5.1) were ranked as the most important resources for POCUS education overall, though not statistically different from each other (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.001). Journal articles (mean importance 3.4, 95% CI 2.2–4.6), eBooks (mean importance 2.9, 95% CI 1.4–4.4), and podcasts (mean importance 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–4.1) were found to be of moderate importance and were not statistically different from each other. Respondents reported that textbooks were of least importance (mean importance 2.1, 95% CI 0.7–3.5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>POCUS educators view nontraditional educational materials with great importance, though in-person workshops remain the mainstay of POCUS education. POCUS educators utilize nontraditional educational materials and consider them more important than textbooks within POCUS curricula.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the role of traditional and nontraditional educational resources in point-of-care ultrasound training: A cross-sectional survey of educator preferences and practices\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Broadstock MD,&nbsp;Annahieta Kalantari DO, MEd,&nbsp;Almaz S. Dessie MD,&nbsp;Al’ai Alvarez MD,&nbsp;Resa E. Lewiss MD,&nbsp;Josie Acuna MD,&nbsp;Anthony Weekes MD, MSc,&nbsp;Kaylah Maloney MD,&nbsp;Uwe Stolz PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Lori Stolz MD,&nbsp;Aalap Shah MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recently, nontraditional educational resources like podcasts, blogs, and online media have gained prominence in medical education and are abundant within the field of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). However, the extent to which POCUS educators utilize online resources compared to traditional resources, like textbooks, journal articles, and in-person workshops, is unknown. We aim to define which types of educational resources are used and preferred by POCUS educators to teach trainees.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An expert working group developed a survey aimed to characterize the types of materials used by POCUS educators and their perceived importance on a 6-point forced ranking scale. We administered the survey to POCUS educators at the 2023 Society for Clinical Ultrasound Fellowships conference. Responses were analyzed using random-effects regression analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-two participants completed the questionnaire. In-person workshops (mean importance 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8–5.4) and online media (mean importance 4.8, 95% CI 4.4–5.1) were ranked as the most important resources for POCUS education overall, though not statistically different from each other (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.001). Journal articles (mean importance 3.4, 95% CI 2.2–4.6), eBooks (mean importance 2.9, 95% CI 1.4–4.4), and podcasts (mean importance 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–4.1) were found to be of moderate importance and were not statistically different from each other. Respondents reported that textbooks were of least importance (mean importance 2.1, 95% CI 0.7–3.5).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>POCUS educators view nontraditional educational materials with great importance, though in-person workshops remain the mainstay of POCUS education. POCUS educators utilize nontraditional educational materials and consider them more important than textbooks within POCUS curricula.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70039\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,非传统的教育资源,如播客、博客和在线媒体在医学教育中获得了突出的地位,并且在护理点超声(POCUS)领域中非常丰富。然而,与传统资源(如教科书、期刊文章和面对面研讨会)相比,POCUS教育者利用在线资源的程度尚不清楚。我们的目标是确定POCUS教育者使用和首选的教育资源类型来教授学员。方法一个专家工作组开展了一项调查,旨在描述POCUS教育者使用的材料类型及其在6分强制排名量表上的重要性。我们在2023年临床超声学会会议上对POCUS的教育工作者进行了调查。采用随机效应回归分析对反应进行分析。结果共62人完成问卷调查。面对面研讨会(平均重要性5.1,95%可信区间[CI] 4.8 - 5.4)和在线媒体(平均重要性4.8,95% CI 4.4-5.1)被列为POCUS教育总体上最重要的资源,尽管彼此之间没有统计学差异(p > 0.001)。期刊文章(平均重要性3.4,95% CI 2.2-4.6)、电子书(平均重要性2.9,95% CI 1.4-4.4)和播客(平均重要性2.8,95% CI 1.5-4.1)被认为具有中等重要性,彼此之间没有统计学差异。受访者报告说教科书是最不重要的(平均重要性2.1,95% CI 0.7-3.5)。结论POCUS教育工作者非常重视非传统的教育材料,尽管面对面的研讨会仍然是POCUS教育的主要形式。POCUS教育者利用非传统的教育材料,并认为它们比POCUS课程中的教科书更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the role of traditional and nontraditional educational resources in point-of-care ultrasound training: A cross-sectional survey of educator preferences and practices

Evaluating the role of traditional and nontraditional educational resources in point-of-care ultrasound training: A cross-sectional survey of educator preferences and practices

Background

Recently, nontraditional educational resources like podcasts, blogs, and online media have gained prominence in medical education and are abundant within the field of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). However, the extent to which POCUS educators utilize online resources compared to traditional resources, like textbooks, journal articles, and in-person workshops, is unknown. We aim to define which types of educational resources are used and preferred by POCUS educators to teach trainees.

Methods

An expert working group developed a survey aimed to characterize the types of materials used by POCUS educators and their perceived importance on a 6-point forced ranking scale. We administered the survey to POCUS educators at the 2023 Society for Clinical Ultrasound Fellowships conference. Responses were analyzed using random-effects regression analyses.

Results

Sixty-two participants completed the questionnaire. In-person workshops (mean importance 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8–5.4) and online media (mean importance 4.8, 95% CI 4.4–5.1) were ranked as the most important resources for POCUS education overall, though not statistically different from each other (p > 0.001). Journal articles (mean importance 3.4, 95% CI 2.2–4.6), eBooks (mean importance 2.9, 95% CI 1.4–4.4), and podcasts (mean importance 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–4.1) were found to be of moderate importance and were not statistically different from each other. Respondents reported that textbooks were of least importance (mean importance 2.1, 95% CI 0.7–3.5).

Conclusions

POCUS educators view nontraditional educational materials with great importance, though in-person workshops remain the mainstay of POCUS education. POCUS educators utilize nontraditional educational materials and consider them more important than textbooks within POCUS curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信