一种使用无标记动作捕捉和循环神经网络对人工材料处理任务进行分类的数据驱动方法

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Aanuoluwapo Ojelade , Mohammad Sadra Rajabi , Sunwook Kim , Maury A. Nussbaum
{"title":"一种使用无标记动作捕捉和循环神经网络对人工材料处理任务进行分类的数据驱动方法","authors":"Aanuoluwapo Ojelade ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sadra Rajabi ,&nbsp;Sunwook Kim ,&nbsp;Maury A. Nussbaum","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent problems that encompass a range of conditions affecting muscles, tendons, and nerves due to repetitive strain, non-neutral postures, and forceful exertions. These disorders lead to pain, reduced productivity and substantial healthcare costs. Effective physical exposure assessment tools are needed in the workplace to quantify WMSD risks and the association between exposure and risks. While several tools are available, they are often limited in scope and lack the ability to assess physical risks continuously. In this study, we evaluated a data-driven approach to continuously classify manual material handling tasks and specific task conditions using different feature sets and machine learning algorithms. Specifically, kinematic data from markerless motion capture (MMC) system was used as input for various recurrent neural networks to classify among eight distinct manual material handling tasks: box lifting, asymmetric box lifting, box carriage, box pushing, box pulling, cart pushing, overhead lifting, and box lowering. The models we tested include bidirectional long-short term memory, gated recurrent units, and bidirectional gated recurrent units. We also classified specific task conditions, such as hand configurations and initial lifting height. Overall, using the MMC's kinematic data led to satisfactory results (e.g., accuracy of 80–94 %) in classifying the tasks and the task conditions. Our results, though, also emphasize that classification performance varied across different feature sets, tasks, and between males and females. Nonetheless, use of MMC demonstrates clear potential for physical exposure assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A data-driven approach to classifying manual material handling tasks using markerless motion capture and recurrent neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Aanuoluwapo Ojelade ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sadra Rajabi ,&nbsp;Sunwook Kim ,&nbsp;Maury A. Nussbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent problems that encompass a range of conditions affecting muscles, tendons, and nerves due to repetitive strain, non-neutral postures, and forceful exertions. These disorders lead to pain, reduced productivity and substantial healthcare costs. Effective physical exposure assessment tools are needed in the workplace to quantify WMSD risks and the association between exposure and risks. While several tools are available, they are often limited in scope and lack the ability to assess physical risks continuously. In this study, we evaluated a data-driven approach to continuously classify manual material handling tasks and specific task conditions using different feature sets and machine learning algorithms. Specifically, kinematic data from markerless motion capture (MMC) system was used as input for various recurrent neural networks to classify among eight distinct manual material handling tasks: box lifting, asymmetric box lifting, box carriage, box pushing, box pulling, cart pushing, overhead lifting, and box lowering. The models we tested include bidirectional long-short term memory, gated recurrent units, and bidirectional gated recurrent units. We also classified specific task conditions, such as hand configurations and initial lifting height. Overall, using the MMC's kinematic data led to satisfactory results (e.g., accuracy of 80–94 %) in classifying the tasks and the task conditions. Our results, though, also emphasize that classification performance varied across different feature sets, tasks, and between males and females. Nonetheless, use of MMC demonstrates clear potential for physical exposure assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)是一种普遍的问题,包括一系列影响肌肉、肌腱和神经的疾病,原因是重复性劳损、非中性姿势和用力。这些疾病导致疼痛、生产力下降和大量医疗保健费用。工作场所需要有效的物理暴露评估工具来量化WMSD风险以及暴露与风险之间的关系。虽然有几种工具可用,但它们的范围往往有限,并且缺乏持续评估物理风险的能力。在本研究中,我们评估了一种数据驱动的方法,该方法使用不同的特征集和机器学习算法连续分类人工材料处理任务和特定任务条件。具体来说,来自无标记运动捕捉(MMC)系统的运动学数据被用作各种递归神经网络的输入,以分类8种不同的人工物料搬运任务:提箱、非对称提箱、运箱、推箱、拉箱、推车、顶升和放箱。我们测试的模型包括双向长短期记忆、门控循环单元和双向门控循环单元。我们还对具体的任务条件进行了分类,例如手的配置和初始提升高度。总的来说,使用MMC的运动学数据在分类任务和任务条件方面取得了令人满意的结果(例如,准确率为80 - 94%)。然而,我们的结果也强调,分类性能在不同的特征集、任务以及男性和女性之间存在差异。尽管如此,MMC的使用显示了物理暴露评估的明显潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A data-driven approach to classifying manual material handling tasks using markerless motion capture and recurrent neural networks
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent problems that encompass a range of conditions affecting muscles, tendons, and nerves due to repetitive strain, non-neutral postures, and forceful exertions. These disorders lead to pain, reduced productivity and substantial healthcare costs. Effective physical exposure assessment tools are needed in the workplace to quantify WMSD risks and the association between exposure and risks. While several tools are available, they are often limited in scope and lack the ability to assess physical risks continuously. In this study, we evaluated a data-driven approach to continuously classify manual material handling tasks and specific task conditions using different feature sets and machine learning algorithms. Specifically, kinematic data from markerless motion capture (MMC) system was used as input for various recurrent neural networks to classify among eight distinct manual material handling tasks: box lifting, asymmetric box lifting, box carriage, box pushing, box pulling, cart pushing, overhead lifting, and box lowering. The models we tested include bidirectional long-short term memory, gated recurrent units, and bidirectional gated recurrent units. We also classified specific task conditions, such as hand configurations and initial lifting height. Overall, using the MMC's kinematic data led to satisfactory results (e.g., accuracy of 80–94 %) in classifying the tasks and the task conditions. Our results, though, also emphasize that classification performance varied across different feature sets, tasks, and between males and females. Nonetheless, use of MMC demonstrates clear potential for physical exposure assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信