{"title":"在孵化器中嵌入新生企业家:技术风险创造中的冲突研究","authors":"Vidit Mohan , Rohan Chinchwadkar , Sankalp Pratap","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technology Business Incubator (TBI), an entrepreneurial support organization (ESO), provides a safe harbor for startups by improving their survival rates. Recent ESO research highlights the collaborative role of entrepreneurs and incubator management in constituting business incubation as a dynamic entrepreneurial context. However, the conflicts that naturally emerge during this co-creation process remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how conflicts arise as entrepreneurs and incubator management collectively construct an incubation context while engaging in new venture creation. We adopt an interpretive, qualitative approach employing thematic analysis of the primary data collected through a year-long ethnographic inquiry at a TBI. We examine the case of a nascent entrepreneur housed in a TBI operating in a large technology-focused academic institution in India and leverage the institutional logics literature as the theoretical anchor. The study reveals that the conflict between an incubator and a nascent entrepreneur arises due to (1) an entrepreneur's non-identification with institutional norms, which encapsulates role conflict and incompatibility with the incubator's values and prescriptions, and (2) compartmentalized upholding of the institutional practices as a result of partial adherence to incubator's process and entrepreneur's opportunistic behavior. It contributes to business incubator literature by theorizing the conflicts between an entrepreneur and incubator management during co-creation of an incubation context. We also present a framework for entrepreneurial embeddedness in the social context of a TBI and inform discussion about the dynamic process of embeddedness in an institutional context. Finally, we articulate best practices or organizational mechanisms that incubators can deploy to reduce or alleviate tensions between themselves and incubated entrepreneurs more constructively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 103252"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embedding nascent entrepreneurs in incubators: Examining conflicts in technology venture creation\",\"authors\":\"Vidit Mohan , Rohan Chinchwadkar , Sankalp Pratap\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technology Business Incubator (TBI), an entrepreneurial support organization (ESO), provides a safe harbor for startups by improving their survival rates. Recent ESO research highlights the collaborative role of entrepreneurs and incubator management in constituting business incubation as a dynamic entrepreneurial context. However, the conflicts that naturally emerge during this co-creation process remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how conflicts arise as entrepreneurs and incubator management collectively construct an incubation context while engaging in new venture creation. We adopt an interpretive, qualitative approach employing thematic analysis of the primary data collected through a year-long ethnographic inquiry at a TBI. We examine the case of a nascent entrepreneur housed in a TBI operating in a large technology-focused academic institution in India and leverage the institutional logics literature as the theoretical anchor. The study reveals that the conflict between an incubator and a nascent entrepreneur arises due to (1) an entrepreneur's non-identification with institutional norms, which encapsulates role conflict and incompatibility with the incubator's values and prescriptions, and (2) compartmentalized upholding of the institutional practices as a result of partial adherence to incubator's process and entrepreneur's opportunistic behavior. It contributes to business incubator literature by theorizing the conflicts between an entrepreneur and incubator management during co-creation of an incubation context. We also present a framework for entrepreneurial embeddedness in the social context of a TBI and inform discussion about the dynamic process of embeddedness in an institutional context. Finally, we articulate best practices or organizational mechanisms that incubators can deploy to reduce or alleviate tensions between themselves and incubated entrepreneurs more constructively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000847\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000847","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Embedding nascent entrepreneurs in incubators: Examining conflicts in technology venture creation
Technology Business Incubator (TBI), an entrepreneurial support organization (ESO), provides a safe harbor for startups by improving their survival rates. Recent ESO research highlights the collaborative role of entrepreneurs and incubator management in constituting business incubation as a dynamic entrepreneurial context. However, the conflicts that naturally emerge during this co-creation process remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how conflicts arise as entrepreneurs and incubator management collectively construct an incubation context while engaging in new venture creation. We adopt an interpretive, qualitative approach employing thematic analysis of the primary data collected through a year-long ethnographic inquiry at a TBI. We examine the case of a nascent entrepreneur housed in a TBI operating in a large technology-focused academic institution in India and leverage the institutional logics literature as the theoretical anchor. The study reveals that the conflict between an incubator and a nascent entrepreneur arises due to (1) an entrepreneur's non-identification with institutional norms, which encapsulates role conflict and incompatibility with the incubator's values and prescriptions, and (2) compartmentalized upholding of the institutional practices as a result of partial adherence to incubator's process and entrepreneur's opportunistic behavior. It contributes to business incubator literature by theorizing the conflicts between an entrepreneur and incubator management during co-creation of an incubation context. We also present a framework for entrepreneurial embeddedness in the social context of a TBI and inform discussion about the dynamic process of embeddedness in an institutional context. Finally, we articulate best practices or organizational mechanisms that incubators can deploy to reduce or alleviate tensions between themselves and incubated entrepreneurs more constructively.
期刊介绍:
The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.