{"title":"地表城市地下:知识生产、设想模式和可见性政治","authors":"Alexander Craig-Thompson, Magdalena Kuchler","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The subsurface is increasingly considered the final frontier of urban development, with marked potential to improve urban spatial problems, resilience and sustainability. At the same time, the literature recognises Urban Underground Space (UUS) as a finite and multi-functional resource that requires holistic and strategic management. However, knowledge of the invisible urban subsurface is obscured by secrecy, fragmented across disciplines, and built on extractive knowledge practices. A lack of long-term planning of UUS perpetuates a first-come-first-served development approach that risks jeopardising future infrastructures and urban sustainability. To address this, there is an effort to gather ever more subsurface data, rendering the invisible visible to urban decision-makers. We analyse and reflect on the limits of current underground planning knowledge, responding to the socio-political gap in UUS literature. We focus on the ontological challenges facing sustainable planning of UUS and present the need to critique how practices of power and politics in UUS knowledge production envision subsurface futures. We present four <em>modes of envisioning</em> the urban subsurface, which negotiate its characteristics of invisibility and complexity to shape volumetric potential and possibility. We argue that governance of this invisible urban frontier requires deeper reflection on how the subsurface is rendered visible and in anticipation of which futures. We suggest that a more nuanced lens is required to account for the interplay between power, depth, and volume through the intersections of plural urban subsurface imaginaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 104301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surfacing the urban underground: Knowledge production, modes of envisioning, and politics of visibility\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Craig-Thompson, Magdalena Kuchler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The subsurface is increasingly considered the final frontier of urban development, with marked potential to improve urban spatial problems, resilience and sustainability. At the same time, the literature recognises Urban Underground Space (UUS) as a finite and multi-functional resource that requires holistic and strategic management. However, knowledge of the invisible urban subsurface is obscured by secrecy, fragmented across disciplines, and built on extractive knowledge practices. A lack of long-term planning of UUS perpetuates a first-come-first-served development approach that risks jeopardising future infrastructures and urban sustainability. To address this, there is an effort to gather ever more subsurface data, rendering the invisible visible to urban decision-makers. We analyse and reflect on the limits of current underground planning knowledge, responding to the socio-political gap in UUS literature. We focus on the ontological challenges facing sustainable planning of UUS and present the need to critique how practices of power and politics in UUS knowledge production envision subsurface futures. We present four <em>modes of envisioning</em> the urban subsurface, which negotiate its characteristics of invisibility and complexity to shape volumetric potential and possibility. We argue that governance of this invisible urban frontier requires deeper reflection on how the subsurface is rendered visible and in anticipation of which futures. We suggest that a more nuanced lens is required to account for the interplay between power, depth, and volume through the intersections of plural urban subsurface imaginaries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surfacing the urban underground: Knowledge production, modes of envisioning, and politics of visibility
The subsurface is increasingly considered the final frontier of urban development, with marked potential to improve urban spatial problems, resilience and sustainability. At the same time, the literature recognises Urban Underground Space (UUS) as a finite and multi-functional resource that requires holistic and strategic management. However, knowledge of the invisible urban subsurface is obscured by secrecy, fragmented across disciplines, and built on extractive knowledge practices. A lack of long-term planning of UUS perpetuates a first-come-first-served development approach that risks jeopardising future infrastructures and urban sustainability. To address this, there is an effort to gather ever more subsurface data, rendering the invisible visible to urban decision-makers. We analyse and reflect on the limits of current underground planning knowledge, responding to the socio-political gap in UUS literature. We focus on the ontological challenges facing sustainable planning of UUS and present the need to critique how practices of power and politics in UUS knowledge production envision subsurface futures. We present four modes of envisioning the urban subsurface, which negotiate its characteristics of invisibility and complexity to shape volumetric potential and possibility. We argue that governance of this invisible urban frontier requires deeper reflection on how the subsurface is rendered visible and in anticipation of which futures. We suggest that a more nuanced lens is required to account for the interplay between power, depth, and volume through the intersections of plural urban subsurface imaginaries.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.