应用治疗计划系统评价早期声门癌三维适形放疗声门表面剂量

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuki Saito, Takahiro Kanehira, Takahito Yuki, Miyako Myojin
{"title":"应用治疗计划系统评价早期声门癌三维适形放疗声门表面剂量","authors":"Yuki Saito,&nbsp;Takahiro Kanehira,&nbsp;Takahito Yuki,&nbsp;Miyako Myojin","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In radiotherapy for early-stage glottic cancer, evaluating the target surface dose at the glottic air–tissue boundary is crucial, as buildup effect can cause underdosing. The accuracy of dose evaluation in the surrounding tissues is affected by both the dose calculation algorithms and the accuracy of the Hounsfield unit values in the glottic air cavities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of dose calculation algorithms and material override on glottic surface dose calculations in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for glottic cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively included three patients with early-stage glottic cancer treated with 3DCRT. Treatment planning based on the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) algorithm in the treatment planning system with a 1-mm dose grid was conducted using a prescribed dose of 65 Gy in 26 fractions. The contours of the glottic air cavities and the surrounding glottic tissues were delineated for material override to air and water, respectively to assign correct materials in dose calculation. Each treatment plan was initially calculated using CCC without material override (CCC_w/o) and recalculated using CCC with material override (CCC_w) as well as photon Monte Carlo (pMC) algorithm with and without material override (pMC_w and pMC_w/o, respectively). A 1-mm glottic surface dose (D<sub>99%</sub>) was evaluated using CCC_w/o, CCC_w, pMC_w, and pMC_w/o.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PMC_w predicted a ∼13.0% reduction in the glottic surface dose compared with the prescribed dose. CCC_w/o, CCC_w, and pMC_w/o overestimated the dose by ∼10.0% compared with pMC_w. The difference between CCC_w/o and pMC_w/o was minimal (0.6%); pMC_w/o significantly overestimated (by 10.8%) the dose compared with pMC_w, indicating the significant impact of material override in pMC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Monte Carlo dose calculations with material override are essential for the accurate surface dose calculation in 3DCRT for glottic cancer. Without appropriate material override, both CCC and pMC overestimate the surface dose.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the glottic surface dose in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage glottic cancer using a treatment planning system\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Saito,&nbsp;Takahiro Kanehira,&nbsp;Takahito Yuki,&nbsp;Miyako Myojin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In radiotherapy for early-stage glottic cancer, evaluating the target surface dose at the glottic air–tissue boundary is crucial, as buildup effect can cause underdosing. The accuracy of dose evaluation in the surrounding tissues is affected by both the dose calculation algorithms and the accuracy of the Hounsfield unit values in the glottic air cavities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of dose calculation algorithms and material override on glottic surface dose calculations in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for glottic cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively included three patients with early-stage glottic cancer treated with 3DCRT. Treatment planning based on the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) algorithm in the treatment planning system with a 1-mm dose grid was conducted using a prescribed dose of 65 Gy in 26 fractions. The contours of the glottic air cavities and the surrounding glottic tissues were delineated for material override to air and water, respectively to assign correct materials in dose calculation. Each treatment plan was initially calculated using CCC without material override (CCC_w/o) and recalculated using CCC with material override (CCC_w) as well as photon Monte Carlo (pMC) algorithm with and without material override (pMC_w and pMC_w/o, respectively). A 1-mm glottic surface dose (D<sub>99%</sub>) was evaluated using CCC_w/o, CCC_w, pMC_w, and pMC_w/o.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>PMC_w predicted a ∼13.0% reduction in the glottic surface dose compared with the prescribed dose. CCC_w/o, CCC_w, and pMC_w/o overestimated the dose by ∼10.0% compared with pMC_w. The difference between CCC_w/o and pMC_w/o was minimal (0.6%); pMC_w/o significantly overestimated (by 10.8%) the dose compared with pMC_w, indicating the significant impact of material override in pMC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Monte Carlo dose calculations with material override are essential for the accurate surface dose calculation in 3DCRT for glottic cancer. Without appropriate material override, both CCC and pMC overestimate the surface dose.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在早期声门癌的放射治疗中,评估声门空气-组织边界的靶表面剂量是至关重要的,因为积聚效应可能导致剂量不足。剂量计算算法和声门腔内霍斯菲尔德单位值的准确性共同影响周围组织剂量评估的准确性。目的探讨剂量计算算法和材料覆盖对声门癌三维适形放疗(3DCRT)声门表面剂量计算的影响。方法回顾性分析3例采用3DCRT治疗的早期声门癌患者。在1 mm剂量网格的治疗计划系统中,采用塌陷锥卷积(CCC)算法进行治疗计划,规定剂量为65 Gy,分26份进行。绘制声门空腔及声门周围组织的轮廓,分别对空气和水进行物质覆盖,以便在剂量计算中分配正确的物质。每个治疗方案最初使用无材料覆盖的CCC (CCC_w/o)进行计算,然后使用有材料覆盖的CCC (CCC_w)以及有和没有材料覆盖的光子蒙特卡罗(pMC)算法(分别为pMC_w和pMC_w/o)进行重新计算。采用CCC_w/o、CCC_w、pMC_w和pMC_w/o评价1 mm声门表面剂量(D99%)。结果:与规定剂量相比,PMC_w预测声门表面剂量减少~ 13.0%。与pMC_w相比,CCC_w/o、CCC_w和pMC_w/o的剂量高估了~ 10.0%。CCC_w/o与pMC_w/o的差异极小(0.6%);与pMC_w相比,pMC_w/o显著高估了剂量(10.8%),表明pMC中物质覆盖的影响显著。结论材料覆盖的蒙特卡罗剂量计算是声门癌3DCRT精确表面剂量计算的必要条件。没有适当的材料覆盖,CCC和pMC都高估了表面剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the glottic surface dose in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage glottic cancer using a treatment planning system

Evaluation of the glottic surface dose in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage glottic cancer using a treatment planning system

Background

In radiotherapy for early-stage glottic cancer, evaluating the target surface dose at the glottic air–tissue boundary is crucial, as buildup effect can cause underdosing. The accuracy of dose evaluation in the surrounding tissues is affected by both the dose calculation algorithms and the accuracy of the Hounsfield unit values in the glottic air cavities.

Purpose

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of dose calculation algorithms and material override on glottic surface dose calculations in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for glottic cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively included three patients with early-stage glottic cancer treated with 3DCRT. Treatment planning based on the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) algorithm in the treatment planning system with a 1-mm dose grid was conducted using a prescribed dose of 65 Gy in 26 fractions. The contours of the glottic air cavities and the surrounding glottic tissues were delineated for material override to air and water, respectively to assign correct materials in dose calculation. Each treatment plan was initially calculated using CCC without material override (CCC_w/o) and recalculated using CCC with material override (CCC_w) as well as photon Monte Carlo (pMC) algorithm with and without material override (pMC_w and pMC_w/o, respectively). A 1-mm glottic surface dose (D99%) was evaluated using CCC_w/o, CCC_w, pMC_w, and pMC_w/o.

Results

PMC_w predicted a ∼13.0% reduction in the glottic surface dose compared with the prescribed dose. CCC_w/o, CCC_w, and pMC_w/o overestimated the dose by ∼10.0% compared with pMC_w. The difference between CCC_w/o and pMC_w/o was minimal (0.6%); pMC_w/o significantly overestimated (by 10.8%) the dose compared with pMC_w, indicating the significant impact of material override in pMC.

Conclusion

Monte Carlo dose calculations with material override are essential for the accurate surface dose calculation in 3DCRT for glottic cancer. Without appropriate material override, both CCC and pMC overestimate the surface dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信