半干旱景观的生态恢复:比较封育与放牧对植被、土壤养分和碳储量的影响

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Gedion Tsegay, George Lartey-Young, Marta Sibhat, Yun-Ze Gao, Xiang-Zhou Meng
{"title":"半干旱景观的生态恢复:比较封育与放牧对植被、土壤养分和碳储量的影响","authors":"Gedion Tsegay,&nbsp;George Lartey-Young,&nbsp;Marta Sibhat,&nbsp;Yun-Ze Gao,&nbsp;Xiang-Zhou Meng","doi":"10.1111/aje.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Land degradation in semi-arid regions poses a major threat to Sustainable Development Goal 15 (SDG 15) by undermining ecosystem services and biodiversity. Although restoration strategies like exclosures are gaining attention, there remains a critical gap in quantifying their long-term ecological and carbon sequestration benefits, particularly in severely degraded landscapes such as Ethiopia's Tigray region. This study addresses that gap by comparing 15-year-old exclosures with adjacent open pasture using a mixed-methods approach. We assessed 62 plots (31 per land use type) for species diversity (Shannon-Wiener and Simpson indices), biomass (via allometric equations), soil properties (at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths), and carbon stocks, employing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation. Results showed that exclosures significantly outperformed pasture, supporting 174 plant species versus 69, higher soil organic carbon (18.71 g/100 g vs. 15.91 g/100 g at 0–15 cm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and greater above-ground biomass (40.72 t/ha vs. 14.24 t/ha, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These findings underscore the potential of exclosures as a scalable and cost-effective strategy for restoring degraded semi-arid ecosystems, offering robust empirical evidence to inform national policy integration, advance SDG 15, and support climate change mitigation across similar regions globally.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological Restoration in Semi-Arid Landscapes: Comparing Exclosures and Pasture for Vegetation, Soil Nutrients, and Carbon Stocks\",\"authors\":\"Gedion Tsegay,&nbsp;George Lartey-Young,&nbsp;Marta Sibhat,&nbsp;Yun-Ze Gao,&nbsp;Xiang-Zhou Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aje.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Land degradation in semi-arid regions poses a major threat to Sustainable Development Goal 15 (SDG 15) by undermining ecosystem services and biodiversity. Although restoration strategies like exclosures are gaining attention, there remains a critical gap in quantifying their long-term ecological and carbon sequestration benefits, particularly in severely degraded landscapes such as Ethiopia's Tigray region. This study addresses that gap by comparing 15-year-old exclosures with adjacent open pasture using a mixed-methods approach. We assessed 62 plots (31 per land use type) for species diversity (Shannon-Wiener and Simpson indices), biomass (via allometric equations), soil properties (at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths), and carbon stocks, employing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation. Results showed that exclosures significantly outperformed pasture, supporting 174 plant species versus 69, higher soil organic carbon (18.71 g/100 g vs. 15.91 g/100 g at 0–15 cm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and greater above-ground biomass (40.72 t/ha vs. 14.24 t/ha, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These findings underscore the potential of exclosures as a scalable and cost-effective strategy for restoring degraded semi-arid ecosystems, offering robust empirical evidence to inform national policy integration, advance SDG 15, and support climate change mitigation across similar regions globally.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"63 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半干旱地区的土地退化破坏生态系统服务和生物多样性,对可持续发展目标15构成重大威胁。尽管像封闭这样的恢复策略正受到关注,但在量化其长期生态和碳封存效益方面仍存在重大差距,特别是在埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区等严重退化的景观中。本研究通过使用混合方法将15年的放牧与邻近的开放牧场进行比较,解决了这一差距。采用主成分分析(PCA)和Pearson相关分析,对62个样地(每种土地利用类型31个)的物种多样性(Shannon-Wiener和Simpson指数)、生物量(异速生长方程)、土壤性质(0-15 cm和15-30 cm深度)和碳储量进行了评估。结果表明,封育明显优于放牧,支持174种植物和69种植物,土壤有机碳含量较高(0-15 cm 18.71 g/100 g比15.91 g/100 g, p < 0.001),地上生物量更高(40.72 t/ha比14.24 t/ha, p < 0.001)。这些研究结果强调了封闭作为恢复退化的半干旱生态系统的可扩展和具有成本效益的战略的潜力,为国家政策整合提供信息,推进可持续发展目标15,并支持在全球类似地区减缓气候变化提供有力的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological Restoration in Semi-Arid Landscapes: Comparing Exclosures and Pasture for Vegetation, Soil Nutrients, and Carbon Stocks

Land degradation in semi-arid regions poses a major threat to Sustainable Development Goal 15 (SDG 15) by undermining ecosystem services and biodiversity. Although restoration strategies like exclosures are gaining attention, there remains a critical gap in quantifying their long-term ecological and carbon sequestration benefits, particularly in severely degraded landscapes such as Ethiopia's Tigray region. This study addresses that gap by comparing 15-year-old exclosures with adjacent open pasture using a mixed-methods approach. We assessed 62 plots (31 per land use type) for species diversity (Shannon-Wiener and Simpson indices), biomass (via allometric equations), soil properties (at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths), and carbon stocks, employing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation. Results showed that exclosures significantly outperformed pasture, supporting 174 plant species versus 69, higher soil organic carbon (18.71 g/100 g vs. 15.91 g/100 g at 0–15 cm, p < 0.001), and greater above-ground biomass (40.72 t/ha vs. 14.24 t/ha, p < 0.001). These findings underscore the potential of exclosures as a scalable and cost-effective strategy for restoring degraded semi-arid ecosystems, offering robust empirical evidence to inform national policy integration, advance SDG 15, and support climate change mitigation across similar regions globally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信