计算时间路径

IF 0.9 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Jessica Enright, Kitty Meeks, Hendrik Molter
{"title":"计算时间路径","authors":"Jessica Enright,&nbsp;Kitty Meeks,&nbsp;Hendrik Molter","doi":"10.1007/s00453-025-01301-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work investigates the parameterised complexity of counting temporal paths. The problem of counting temporal paths is mainly motivated by temporal betweenness computation. The betweenness centrality of a vertex <i>v</i> is an important centrality measure that quantifies how many optimal paths between pairs of other vertices visit <i>v</i>. Computing betweenness centrality in a temporal graph, in which the edge set may change over discrete timesteps, requires us to count temporal paths that are optimal with respect to some criterion. For several natural notions of optimality, including <i>foremost</i> or <i>fastest</i> temporal paths, this counting problem reduces to <span>#Temporal Path</span>, the problem of counting <i>all</i> temporal paths between a fixed pair of vertices; like the problems of counting foremost and fastest temporal paths, <span>#Temporal Path</span> is #P-hard in general. Motivated by the many applications of this intractable problem, we initiate a systematic study of the parameterised and approximation complexity of <span>#Temporal Path</span>. We show that the problem presumably does not admit an FPT-algorithm for the feedback vertex number of the static underlying graph, and that it is hard to approximate in general. On the positive side, we prove several exact and approximate FPT-algorithms for special cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50824,"journal":{"name":"Algorithmica","volume":"87 5","pages":"736 - 782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00453-025-01301-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counting Temporal Paths\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Enright,&nbsp;Kitty Meeks,&nbsp;Hendrik Molter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00453-025-01301-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This work investigates the parameterised complexity of counting temporal paths. The problem of counting temporal paths is mainly motivated by temporal betweenness computation. The betweenness centrality of a vertex <i>v</i> is an important centrality measure that quantifies how many optimal paths between pairs of other vertices visit <i>v</i>. Computing betweenness centrality in a temporal graph, in which the edge set may change over discrete timesteps, requires us to count temporal paths that are optimal with respect to some criterion. For several natural notions of optimality, including <i>foremost</i> or <i>fastest</i> temporal paths, this counting problem reduces to <span>#Temporal Path</span>, the problem of counting <i>all</i> temporal paths between a fixed pair of vertices; like the problems of counting foremost and fastest temporal paths, <span>#Temporal Path</span> is #P-hard in general. Motivated by the many applications of this intractable problem, we initiate a systematic study of the parameterised and approximation complexity of <span>#Temporal Path</span>. We show that the problem presumably does not admit an FPT-algorithm for the feedback vertex number of the static underlying graph, and that it is hard to approximate in general. On the positive side, we prove several exact and approximate FPT-algorithms for special cases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algorithmica\",\"volume\":\"87 5\",\"pages\":\"736 - 782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00453-025-01301-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algorithmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00453-025-01301-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithmica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00453-025-01301-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作研究了计数时间路径的参数化复杂性。时间路径的计数问题主要是由时间间性计算引起的。顶点v的中间性中心性是一个重要的中心性度量,它量化了访问v的其他顶点对之间有多少条最优路径。计算时间图中的中间性中心性,其中边缘集可能会随着离散时间步长而变化,需要我们计算相对于某些标准的最优时间路径。对于一些自然的最优性概念,包括最优或最快的时间路径,这个计数问题简化为# temporal Path,计算固定顶点对之间的所有时间路径的问题;就像计算最重要和最快的时间路径的问题一样,#时间路径通常也是#P-hard。在这个棘手问题的许多应用的激励下,我们开始了对#Temporal Path的参数化和近似复杂性的系统研究。我们证明了这个问题大概不允许静态底层图的反馈顶点数的fpt算法,并且它很难在一般情况下近似。在积极的方面,我们证明了几种特殊情况下的精确和近似fpt算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Counting Temporal Paths

This work investigates the parameterised complexity of counting temporal paths. The problem of counting temporal paths is mainly motivated by temporal betweenness computation. The betweenness centrality of a vertex v is an important centrality measure that quantifies how many optimal paths between pairs of other vertices visit v. Computing betweenness centrality in a temporal graph, in which the edge set may change over discrete timesteps, requires us to count temporal paths that are optimal with respect to some criterion. For several natural notions of optimality, including foremost or fastest temporal paths, this counting problem reduces to #Temporal Path, the problem of counting all temporal paths between a fixed pair of vertices; like the problems of counting foremost and fastest temporal paths, #Temporal Path is #P-hard in general. Motivated by the many applications of this intractable problem, we initiate a systematic study of the parameterised and approximation complexity of #Temporal Path. We show that the problem presumably does not admit an FPT-algorithm for the feedback vertex number of the static underlying graph, and that it is hard to approximate in general. On the positive side, we prove several exact and approximate FPT-algorithms for special cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Algorithmica
Algorithmica 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Algorithmica is an international journal which publishes theoretical papers on algorithms that address problems arising in practical areas, and experimental papers of general appeal for practical importance or techniques. The development of algorithms is an integral part of computer science. The increasing complexity and scope of computer applications makes the design of efficient algorithms essential. Algorithmica covers algorithms in applied areas such as: VLSI, distributed computing, parallel processing, automated design, robotics, graphics, data base design, software tools, as well as algorithms in fundamental areas such as sorting, searching, data structures, computational geometry, and linear programming. In addition, the journal features two special sections: Application Experience, presenting findings obtained from applications of theoretical results to practical situations, and Problems, offering short papers presenting problems on selected topics of computer science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信