粒子模拟中估计局部密度的不同方法的比较

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Elias Ganthaler, Sameen Mustafa, Angelika Peer
{"title":"粒子模拟中估计局部密度的不同方法的比较","authors":"Elias Ganthaler,&nbsp;Sameen Mustafa,&nbsp;Angelika Peer","doi":"10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Knowledge about the local relative density and porosity over a randomly packed particle system is important as it provides valuable insights into the system’s behaviour, as several numerical simulations rely on this information. In this study, different methods of estimating the local density of particle systems are compared and contrasted. These methods depend on particle-based data and can be applied to a wide variety of particle systems, including granular materials and powders. The first method divides the volume of interest along an axis; the second along two and three axes; the third is based on the probability density function of kernel densities (KDE); the fourth uses the Caley–Menger method; the fifth uses the method presented by Strobel; and the sixth performs a Delaunay triangulation of the volume, where two different implementations are investigated. In this study, discrete element method (DEM) simulations are performed to produce the dataset used for comparison. Randomly packed particles with varying radii within a predefined region of interest (ROI) are considered for simulations. The aforementioned methods are then employed to estimate the local relative density at any point in the ROI. The results indicate that the method based on the Voronoi tessellation provides the most accurate local density estimation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"12 2","pages":"1217 - 1231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different methodologies for estimating local density in particle-based simulations\",\"authors\":\"Elias Ganthaler,&nbsp;Sameen Mustafa,&nbsp;Angelika Peer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Knowledge about the local relative density and porosity over a randomly packed particle system is important as it provides valuable insights into the system’s behaviour, as several numerical simulations rely on this information. In this study, different methods of estimating the local density of particle systems are compared and contrasted. These methods depend on particle-based data and can be applied to a wide variety of particle systems, including granular materials and powders. The first method divides the volume of interest along an axis; the second along two and three axes; the third is based on the probability density function of kernel densities (KDE); the fourth uses the Caley–Menger method; the fifth uses the method presented by Strobel; and the sixth performs a Delaunay triangulation of the volume, where two different implementations are investigated. In this study, discrete element method (DEM) simulations are performed to produce the dataset used for comparison. Randomly packed particles with varying radii within a predefined region of interest (ROI) are considered for simulations. The aforementioned methods are then employed to estimate the local relative density at any point in the ROI. The results indicate that the method based on the Voronoi tessellation provides the most accurate local density estimation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"1217 - 1231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于随机堆积的粒子系统的局部相对密度和孔隙率的知识很重要,因为它提供了对系统行为的有价值的见解,因为一些数值模拟依赖于这些信息。在本研究中,比较和对比了估计粒子系统局部密度的不同方法。这些方法依赖于基于颗粒的数据,可以应用于各种颗粒系统,包括颗粒材料和粉末。第一种方法是沿轴划分感兴趣的体积;第二轴沿二轴和三轴;第三种是基于核密度的概率密度函数(KDE);第四种方法采用Caley-Menger方法;第五种方法采用Strobel提出的方法;第六种是对体积进行Delaunay三角剖分,其中研究了两种不同的实现。在本研究中,采用离散元法(DEM)模拟生成用于比较的数据集。在预定义的感兴趣区域(ROI)内考虑具有不同半径的随机填充粒子进行模拟。然后使用上述方法来估计ROI中任意点的局部相对密度。结果表明,基于Voronoi镶嵌的局部密度估计方法是最精确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different methodologies for estimating local density in particle-based simulations

Knowledge about the local relative density and porosity over a randomly packed particle system is important as it provides valuable insights into the system’s behaviour, as several numerical simulations rely on this information. In this study, different methods of estimating the local density of particle systems are compared and contrasted. These methods depend on particle-based data and can be applied to a wide variety of particle systems, including granular materials and powders. The first method divides the volume of interest along an axis; the second along two and three axes; the third is based on the probability density function of kernel densities (KDE); the fourth uses the Caley–Menger method; the fifth uses the method presented by Strobel; and the sixth performs a Delaunay triangulation of the volume, where two different implementations are investigated. In this study, discrete element method (DEM) simulations are performed to produce the dataset used for comparison. Randomly packed particles with varying radii within a predefined region of interest (ROI) are considered for simulations. The aforementioned methods are then employed to estimate the local relative density at any point in the ROI. The results indicate that the method based on the Voronoi tessellation provides the most accurate local density estimation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Particle Mechanics
Computational Particle Mechanics Mathematics-Computational Mathematics
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including: (a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc., (b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and (c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信