{"title":"粒子模拟中估计局部密度的不同方法的比较","authors":"Elias Ganthaler, Sameen Mustafa, Angelika Peer","doi":"10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Knowledge about the local relative density and porosity over a randomly packed particle system is important as it provides valuable insights into the system’s behaviour, as several numerical simulations rely on this information. In this study, different methods of estimating the local density of particle systems are compared and contrasted. These methods depend on particle-based data and can be applied to a wide variety of particle systems, including granular materials and powders. The first method divides the volume of interest along an axis; the second along two and three axes; the third is based on the probability density function of kernel densities (KDE); the fourth uses the Caley–Menger method; the fifth uses the method presented by Strobel; and the sixth performs a Delaunay triangulation of the volume, where two different implementations are investigated. In this study, discrete element method (DEM) simulations are performed to produce the dataset used for comparison. Randomly packed particles with varying radii within a predefined region of interest (ROI) are considered for simulations. The aforementioned methods are then employed to estimate the local relative density at any point in the ROI. The results indicate that the method based on the Voronoi tessellation provides the most accurate local density estimation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"12 2","pages":"1217 - 1231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different methodologies for estimating local density in particle-based simulations\",\"authors\":\"Elias Ganthaler, Sameen Mustafa, Angelika Peer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Knowledge about the local relative density and porosity over a randomly packed particle system is important as it provides valuable insights into the system’s behaviour, as several numerical simulations rely on this information. In this study, different methods of estimating the local density of particle systems are compared and contrasted. These methods depend on particle-based data and can be applied to a wide variety of particle systems, including granular materials and powders. The first method divides the volume of interest along an axis; the second along two and three axes; the third is based on the probability density function of kernel densities (KDE); the fourth uses the Caley–Menger method; the fifth uses the method presented by Strobel; and the sixth performs a Delaunay triangulation of the volume, where two different implementations are investigated. In this study, discrete element method (DEM) simulations are performed to produce the dataset used for comparison. Randomly packed particles with varying radii within a predefined region of interest (ROI) are considered for simulations. The aforementioned methods are then employed to estimate the local relative density at any point in the ROI. The results indicate that the method based on the Voronoi tessellation provides the most accurate local density estimation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"1217 - 1231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00870-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of different methodologies for estimating local density in particle-based simulations
Knowledge about the local relative density and porosity over a randomly packed particle system is important as it provides valuable insights into the system’s behaviour, as several numerical simulations rely on this information. In this study, different methods of estimating the local density of particle systems are compared and contrasted. These methods depend on particle-based data and can be applied to a wide variety of particle systems, including granular materials and powders. The first method divides the volume of interest along an axis; the second along two and three axes; the third is based on the probability density function of kernel densities (KDE); the fourth uses the Caley–Menger method; the fifth uses the method presented by Strobel; and the sixth performs a Delaunay triangulation of the volume, where two different implementations are investigated. In this study, discrete element method (DEM) simulations are performed to produce the dataset used for comparison. Randomly packed particles with varying radii within a predefined region of interest (ROI) are considered for simulations. The aforementioned methods are then employed to estimate the local relative density at any point in the ROI. The results indicate that the method based on the Voronoi tessellation provides the most accurate local density estimation.
期刊介绍:
GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including:
(a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc.,
(b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and
(c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as
Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.