Susanne N. Kolle , Peggy Haase , Britta Wareing , Monika Kemeny , Stefan Stinchcombe , Dorothee Funk-Weyer , Robert Landsiedel
{"title":"目前还没有从六种中剔除兔子眼睛:TTT并没有预测农药配方的体内眼睛刺激分类的全部范围","authors":"Susanne N. Kolle , Peggy Haase , Britta Wareing , Monika Kemeny , Stefan Stinchcombe , Dorothee Funk-Weyer , Robert Landsiedel","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since its adoption as a test guideline (EIT, OECD test guideline (TG) 492) in 2015, the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test has been the in vitro method of choice to identify agrochemical formulations non-irritant to the eye (neither category 1 nor 2, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, GHS). For serious eye damage (GHS category 1), however, none of the in vitro test methods including the bovine cornea opacity and permeability test (BCOP, OECD TG 437, and protocol modifications), the isolated chicken eye test (ICE, OECD TG 438), the ocular irritation assay (OECD TG 496) or the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay proved sufficiently sensitive to correctly identify agrochemical formulations classified as seriously eye damaging in vivo. In 2022, the OECD adopted a new in vitro test guideline for identifying chemicals inducing serious eye damage, eye irritation, and chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation (OECD TG 492B). However, within the formal validation study of this time-to-toxicity (TTT) test method, agrochemical formulations were not included. To assess the applicability of this test to agrochemical formulations 25 formulations with historical in vivo data were assessed in the TTT. The TTT correctly predicted 0 %, 90 % and 50 % of the agrochemical formulations which were classified by the in vivo data into the three categories 1, 2 and “not classified”, respectively. The overall accuracy of the TTT to predict agrochemical formulations of the three categories was 52 %. Therefore, to facilitate non-animal-based identification of the full range of ocular irritation of agrochemical formulations, testing protocols and/or prediction models must be revised or classification guidelines should be adjusted to align with human relevant in vitro testing rather than relying on in vivo Draize data as a reference point.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105841"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not yet nixing rabbit eyes from the six: the TTT is not predicting the full range of in vivo eye irritation classifications for agrochemical formulations\",\"authors\":\"Susanne N. Kolle , Peggy Haase , Britta Wareing , Monika Kemeny , Stefan Stinchcombe , Dorothee Funk-Weyer , Robert Landsiedel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since its adoption as a test guideline (EIT, OECD test guideline (TG) 492) in 2015, the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test has been the in vitro method of choice to identify agrochemical formulations non-irritant to the eye (neither category 1 nor 2, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, GHS). For serious eye damage (GHS category 1), however, none of the in vitro test methods including the bovine cornea opacity and permeability test (BCOP, OECD TG 437, and protocol modifications), the isolated chicken eye test (ICE, OECD TG 438), the ocular irritation assay (OECD TG 496) or the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay proved sufficiently sensitive to correctly identify agrochemical formulations classified as seriously eye damaging in vivo. In 2022, the OECD adopted a new in vitro test guideline for identifying chemicals inducing serious eye damage, eye irritation, and chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation (OECD TG 492B). However, within the formal validation study of this time-to-toxicity (TTT) test method, agrochemical formulations were not included. To assess the applicability of this test to agrochemical formulations 25 formulations with historical in vivo data were assessed in the TTT. The TTT correctly predicted 0 %, 90 % and 50 % of the agrochemical formulations which were classified by the in vivo data into the three categories 1, 2 and “not classified”, respectively. The overall accuracy of the TTT to predict agrochemical formulations of the three categories was 52 %. Therefore, to facilitate non-animal-based identification of the full range of ocular irritation of agrochemical formulations, testing protocols and/or prediction models must be revised or classification guidelines should be adjusted to align with human relevant in vitro testing rather than relying on in vivo Draize data as a reference point.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Not yet nixing rabbit eyes from the six: the TTT is not predicting the full range of in vivo eye irritation classifications for agrochemical formulations
Since its adoption as a test guideline (EIT, OECD test guideline (TG) 492) in 2015, the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test has been the in vitro method of choice to identify agrochemical formulations non-irritant to the eye (neither category 1 nor 2, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, GHS). For serious eye damage (GHS category 1), however, none of the in vitro test methods including the bovine cornea opacity and permeability test (BCOP, OECD TG 437, and protocol modifications), the isolated chicken eye test (ICE, OECD TG 438), the ocular irritation assay (OECD TG 496) or the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay proved sufficiently sensitive to correctly identify agrochemical formulations classified as seriously eye damaging in vivo. In 2022, the OECD adopted a new in vitro test guideline for identifying chemicals inducing serious eye damage, eye irritation, and chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation (OECD TG 492B). However, within the formal validation study of this time-to-toxicity (TTT) test method, agrochemical formulations were not included. To assess the applicability of this test to agrochemical formulations 25 formulations with historical in vivo data were assessed in the TTT. The TTT correctly predicted 0 %, 90 % and 50 % of the agrochemical formulations which were classified by the in vivo data into the three categories 1, 2 and “not classified”, respectively. The overall accuracy of the TTT to predict agrochemical formulations of the three categories was 52 %. Therefore, to facilitate non-animal-based identification of the full range of ocular irritation of agrochemical formulations, testing protocols and/or prediction models must be revised or classification guidelines should be adjusted to align with human relevant in vitro testing rather than relying on in vivo Draize data as a reference point.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)