{"title":"腹壁穿孔修补术的临床应用","authors":"Joshua Meyerov , Rachna Ram , Damien Grinsell","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Perforator selection is critical during operative planning for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical variations in deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforators and their primary subcutaneous branching patterns within the perforasome, using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA) to develop a new nomenclature system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Abdominal CTA scans of 180 patients undergoing preoperative imaging for DIEP flap reconstruction were evaluated. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume-rendering technique (VRT) reconstructions were used to map perforator anatomy. Branching patterns were correlated to the location and subcutaneous course of the perforators, at emergence from the anterior rectus sheath.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Perforators were classified into 3 main categories and further sub-classified based on the orientation of tributaries. Type I perforators were the most common (87.2%) and coursed as a single trunk (IA) or bifurcated with an internal angle ≤30° (IB). Type II perforators (7.5%) bifurcated at 180 ± 20° (IIA) or between 30° and 160° (IIB). Type III perforators (5.3%) produced 3 or more primary branches. On an average, there were 2.9 ± 1.6 perforators per hemi-abdomen. Larger caliber vessels were found closer to the umbilicus (P < 0.005). Most perforators (80.5%) exited the rectus sheath caudal to the umbilicus and coursed in an inferolateral direction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides a novel classification of the primary subcutaneous perforasome branching patterns of DIEA perforators and highlights the clinical implications for improved flap design and operative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"105 ","pages":"Pages 283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining the abdominal wall perforasome with clinical application\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Meyerov , Rachna Ram , Damien Grinsell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Perforator selection is critical during operative planning for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical variations in deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforators and their primary subcutaneous branching patterns within the perforasome, using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA) to develop a new nomenclature system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Abdominal CTA scans of 180 patients undergoing preoperative imaging for DIEP flap reconstruction were evaluated. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume-rendering technique (VRT) reconstructions were used to map perforator anatomy. Branching patterns were correlated to the location and subcutaneous course of the perforators, at emergence from the anterior rectus sheath.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Perforators were classified into 3 main categories and further sub-classified based on the orientation of tributaries. Type I perforators were the most common (87.2%) and coursed as a single trunk (IA) or bifurcated with an internal angle ≤30° (IB). Type II perforators (7.5%) bifurcated at 180 ± 20° (IIA) or between 30° and 160° (IIB). Type III perforators (5.3%) produced 3 or more primary branches. On an average, there were 2.9 ± 1.6 perforators per hemi-abdomen. Larger caliber vessels were found closer to the umbilicus (P < 0.005). Most perforators (80.5%) exited the rectus sheath caudal to the umbilicus and coursed in an inferolateral direction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides a novel classification of the primary subcutaneous perforasome branching patterns of DIEA perforators and highlights the clinical implications for improved flap design and operative outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 283-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525002669\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525002669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Refining the abdominal wall perforasome with clinical application
Background and purpose
Perforator selection is critical during operative planning for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical variations in deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforators and their primary subcutaneous branching patterns within the perforasome, using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA) to develop a new nomenclature system.
Methods
Abdominal CTA scans of 180 patients undergoing preoperative imaging for DIEP flap reconstruction were evaluated. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume-rendering technique (VRT) reconstructions were used to map perforator anatomy. Branching patterns were correlated to the location and subcutaneous course of the perforators, at emergence from the anterior rectus sheath.
Results
Perforators were classified into 3 main categories and further sub-classified based on the orientation of tributaries. Type I perforators were the most common (87.2%) and coursed as a single trunk (IA) or bifurcated with an internal angle ≤30° (IB). Type II perforators (7.5%) bifurcated at 180 ± 20° (IIA) or between 30° and 160° (IIB). Type III perforators (5.3%) produced 3 or more primary branches. On an average, there were 2.9 ± 1.6 perforators per hemi-abdomen. Larger caliber vessels were found closer to the umbilicus (P < 0.005). Most perforators (80.5%) exited the rectus sheath caudal to the umbilicus and coursed in an inferolateral direction.
Conclusions
This study provides a novel classification of the primary subcutaneous perforasome branching patterns of DIEA perforators and highlights the clinical implications for improved flap design and operative outcomes.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.