Eric Steimetz , Zeliha Celen Simsek , Asmita Saha , Rong Xia , Raavi Gupta
{"title":"用于检测结直肠腺瘤高级别发育不良的深度学习模型","authors":"Eric Steimetz , Zeliha Celen Simsek , Asmita Saha , Rong Xia , Raavi Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning model for detecting high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas\",\"authors\":\"Eric Steimetz , Zeliha Celen Simsek , Asmita Saha , Rong Xia , Raavi Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep learning model for detecting high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas
Objective
Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD.
Design
We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions.
Results
The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.