用于检测结直肠腺瘤高级别发育不良的深度学习模型

Q2 Medicine
Eric Steimetz , Zeliha Celen Simsek , Asmita Saha , Rong Xia , Raavi Gupta
{"title":"用于检测结直肠腺瘤高级别发育不良的深度学习模型","authors":"Eric Steimetz ,&nbsp;Zeliha Celen Simsek ,&nbsp;Asmita Saha ,&nbsp;Rong Xia ,&nbsp;Raavi Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning model for detecting high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas\",\"authors\":\"Eric Steimetz ,&nbsp;Zeliha Celen Simsek ,&nbsp;Asmita Saha ,&nbsp;Rong Xia ,&nbsp;Raavi Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在常规结肠镜检查中及早发现并切除可疑息肉,对降低结直肠癌的发生风险具有重要意义。患者的管理和随访取决于息肉切除的类型和组织学评估中出现的发育不良程度。然而,区分良性息肉和发育不良是一项微不足道的任务,区分管状腺瘤伴低级别发育不良(LGD)和高级别发育不良(HGD)是一项具有挑战性的任务。在本研究中,我们训练了一个深度学习模型来区分LGD和HGD的结直肠腺瘤。我们检索了2011年1月至2024年10月期间拍摄的259张腺瘤性息肉的幻灯片。HGD的载玻片由受过亚专科训练的胃肠道病理学家检查。排除不一致和重复病例后,剩下200张玻片:HGD 71张(35.5%),LGD 129张(64.5%)。幻灯片分为训练组(160张,占80%)和测试组(40张,占20%)。在patch生成和染色归一化之后,使用5倍交叉验证训练ResNet34模型(在ImageNet上预训练)。通过汇总斑块级预测来确定幻灯片分类。结果该模型对40张幻灯片的预测准确率为95.0%,除2张外,其余均正确。该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积得分为0.981,F1得分为0.923。结论本研究表明,深度学习模型可以准确区分LGD和HGD结肠腺瘤。在更大的数据集上进行训练可以提高模型的准确性和泛化性,应该成为进一步研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning model for detecting high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas

Objective

Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD.

Design

We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions.

Results

The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信