不明原因的新不伦瑞克神经综合征的临床和神经病理学评价。

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nathaniel Bendahan,Sylvia Gautreau,Alex Medina Escobar,Gerard H Jansen,Eslam Abdellah,Sarmad Al-Shamaa,Gabriela S Gilmour,Lorraine V Kalia,Sarah C Lidstone,M Jason MacDonald,Maria Carmela Tartaglia,Annette Thebeau,Anthony E Lang
{"title":"不明原因的新不伦瑞克神经综合征的临床和神经病理学评价。","authors":"Nathaniel Bendahan,Sylvia Gautreau,Alex Medina Escobar,Gerard H Jansen,Eslam Abdellah,Sarmad Al-Shamaa,Gabriela S Gilmour,Lorraine V Kalia,Sarah C Lidstone,M Jason MacDonald,Maria Carmela Tartaglia,Annette Thebeau,Anthony E Lang","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nIn 2019, an alleged \"mystery\" neurological illness emerged in New Brunswick, Canada. Despite extensive media attention, no case description has been published to date.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo report on 25 patients with a diagnosis of New Brunswick neurological syndrome of unknown cause (NSUC) who subsequently received a second, independent clinical reassessment or neuropathological examination between 2020 and 2025.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis cross-sectional study of cases derived from a cohort of patients (n = 222) who had received an NSUC diagnosis. Four movement disorder neurologists and 2 behavioral neurologists carried out clinical evaluations at 2 hospitals in New Brunswick and Ontario, Canada. Neuropathological diagnoses were obtained in Ontario by a neuropathologist and a second reviewer, both blinded to the case histories. Eligible patients were offered a second opinion; 4 families of deceased patients provided consent for reporting autopsies and waivers of consent were obtained for 7.\r\n\r\nExposure\r\nNSUC as described in the case definition circulated by Public Health New Brunswick in 2021.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nFindings from the independent clinical evaluations and diagnoses obtained through neuropathological examination.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nAmong 105 eligible patients, 14 patients (aged 20-55 years; 8 female, 6 male) received clinical evaluations, and 11 patients (aged 56-82 years; 5 female, 6 male) had neuropathological diagnoses. Well-known conditions were identified in all 25 cases, including common neurodegenerative diseases, functional neurological disorder, traumatic brain injury, and metastatic cancer. Based on the 11 autopsy cases, a new disease was extremely unlikely, with a probability less than .001. When applying the 95% confidence interval for the true probability of no new disease, the data revealed a high probability between 87% and 100%.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nThere was no evidence supporting a diagnosis of NSUC in this cohort. The data inclusive of independent examinations and neuropathology strongly supported the presence of several neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative conditions. Unfounded concerns that a potentially fatal mystery disease, possibly induced by an environmental toxin, is causing the patients' neurological symptoms has been amplified in traditional and social media. Second, independent clinical evaluations are needed for any patient given a diagnosis of NSUC.","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Neuropathological Evaluations of the New Brunswick Neurological Syndrome of Unknown Cause.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel Bendahan,Sylvia Gautreau,Alex Medina Escobar,Gerard H Jansen,Eslam Abdellah,Sarmad Al-Shamaa,Gabriela S Gilmour,Lorraine V Kalia,Sarah C Lidstone,M Jason MacDonald,Maria Carmela Tartaglia,Annette Thebeau,Anthony E Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance\\r\\nIn 2019, an alleged \\\"mystery\\\" neurological illness emerged in New Brunswick, Canada. Despite extensive media attention, no case description has been published to date.\\r\\n\\r\\nObjective\\r\\nTo report on 25 patients with a diagnosis of New Brunswick neurological syndrome of unknown cause (NSUC) who subsequently received a second, independent clinical reassessment or neuropathological examination between 2020 and 2025.\\r\\n\\r\\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\\r\\nThis cross-sectional study of cases derived from a cohort of patients (n = 222) who had received an NSUC diagnosis. Four movement disorder neurologists and 2 behavioral neurologists carried out clinical evaluations at 2 hospitals in New Brunswick and Ontario, Canada. Neuropathological diagnoses were obtained in Ontario by a neuropathologist and a second reviewer, both blinded to the case histories. Eligible patients were offered a second opinion; 4 families of deceased patients provided consent for reporting autopsies and waivers of consent were obtained for 7.\\r\\n\\r\\nExposure\\r\\nNSUC as described in the case definition circulated by Public Health New Brunswick in 2021.\\r\\n\\r\\nMain Outcomes and Measures\\r\\nFindings from the independent clinical evaluations and diagnoses obtained through neuropathological examination.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nAmong 105 eligible patients, 14 patients (aged 20-55 years; 8 female, 6 male) received clinical evaluations, and 11 patients (aged 56-82 years; 5 female, 6 male) had neuropathological diagnoses. Well-known conditions were identified in all 25 cases, including common neurodegenerative diseases, functional neurological disorder, traumatic brain injury, and metastatic cancer. Based on the 11 autopsy cases, a new disease was extremely unlikely, with a probability less than .001. When applying the 95% confidence interval for the true probability of no new disease, the data revealed a high probability between 87% and 100%.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions and Relevance\\r\\nThere was no evidence supporting a diagnosis of NSUC in this cohort. The data inclusive of independent examinations and neuropathology strongly supported the presence of several neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative conditions. Unfounded concerns that a potentially fatal mystery disease, possibly induced by an environmental toxin, is causing the patients' neurological symptoms has been amplified in traditional and social media. Second, independent clinical evaluations are needed for any patient given a diagnosis of NSUC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1718\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,加拿大新不伦瑞克省出现了一种所谓的“神秘”神经系统疾病。尽管得到了媒体的广泛关注,但迄今为止尚未发表任何病例描述。目的报告25例诊断为新不伦瑞克省不明原因神经综合征(NSUC)的患者,这些患者随后在2020年至2025年间接受了第二次独立的临床重新评估或神经病理学检查。设计、环境和参与者:本横断面研究的病例来自一组确诊为NSUC的患者(n = 222)。四名运动障碍神经科医生和两名行为神经科医生在加拿大新不伦瑞克省和安大略省的两家医院进行了临床评估。神经病理学诊断是在安大略省由一名神经病理学家和另一名审稿人获得的,他们都对病例历史不知情。为符合条件的患者提供第二意见;4名死者家属同意报告尸体解剖,7名死者家属获得放弃同意。如新不伦瑞克省公共卫生部在2021年散发的病例定义中所述。主要结果和方法:通过神经病理检查获得独立的临床评价和诊断结果。结果105例符合条件的患者中,14例(年龄20 ~ 55岁;女性8例,男性6例)接受临床评估,11例患者(年龄56 ~ 82岁;女性5例,男性6例)有神经病理诊断。在所有25例病例中确定了众所周知的疾病,包括常见的神经退行性疾病、功能性神经障碍、创伤性脑损伤和转移性癌症。根据11例尸检病例,一种新的疾病是极不可能的,概率小于0.001。当对没有新疾病的真实概率应用95%置信区间时,数据显示在87%到100%之间的高概率。结论和相关性在该队列中没有证据支持NSUC的诊断。包括独立检查和神经病理学在内的数据有力地支持了几种神经退行性和非神经退行性疾病的存在。传统媒体和社交媒体放大了一种毫无根据的担忧,即一种可能由环境毒素引起的潜在致命神秘疾病正在导致患者的神经系统症状。其次,任何被诊断为NSUC的患者都需要独立的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and Neuropathological Evaluations of the New Brunswick Neurological Syndrome of Unknown Cause.
Importance In 2019, an alleged "mystery" neurological illness emerged in New Brunswick, Canada. Despite extensive media attention, no case description has been published to date. Objective To report on 25 patients with a diagnosis of New Brunswick neurological syndrome of unknown cause (NSUC) who subsequently received a second, independent clinical reassessment or neuropathological examination between 2020 and 2025. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study of cases derived from a cohort of patients (n = 222) who had received an NSUC diagnosis. Four movement disorder neurologists and 2 behavioral neurologists carried out clinical evaluations at 2 hospitals in New Brunswick and Ontario, Canada. Neuropathological diagnoses were obtained in Ontario by a neuropathologist and a second reviewer, both blinded to the case histories. Eligible patients were offered a second opinion; 4 families of deceased patients provided consent for reporting autopsies and waivers of consent were obtained for 7. Exposure NSUC as described in the case definition circulated by Public Health New Brunswick in 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Findings from the independent clinical evaluations and diagnoses obtained through neuropathological examination. Results Among 105 eligible patients, 14 patients (aged 20-55 years; 8 female, 6 male) received clinical evaluations, and 11 patients (aged 56-82 years; 5 female, 6 male) had neuropathological diagnoses. Well-known conditions were identified in all 25 cases, including common neurodegenerative diseases, functional neurological disorder, traumatic brain injury, and metastatic cancer. Based on the 11 autopsy cases, a new disease was extremely unlikely, with a probability less than .001. When applying the 95% confidence interval for the true probability of no new disease, the data revealed a high probability between 87% and 100%. Conclusions and Relevance There was no evidence supporting a diagnosis of NSUC in this cohort. The data inclusive of independent examinations and neuropathology strongly supported the presence of several neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative conditions. Unfounded concerns that a potentially fatal mystery disease, possibly induced by an environmental toxin, is causing the patients' neurological symptoms has been amplified in traditional and social media. Second, independent clinical evaluations are needed for any patient given a diagnosis of NSUC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信