不适当的诱导和不同的影响:一个集体主义的解释

Q2 Social Sciences
Christopher Bobier
{"title":"不适当的诱导和不同的影响:一个集体主义的解释","authors":"Christopher Bobier","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is consensus that an inducement to participate in clinical research is undue if it compromises individual decision-making, thereby undermining voluntariness—a would-be research participant is made an excessive offer that prevents him or her from deciding well, however that is understood. I set forth and defend a view that conceptualizes inducements as undue if they result in the disparate enrollment of a protected class of individuals. I argue that this new conception avoids the problems with the standard view, is easy to operationalize, and clarifies the relation between exploitation and undue inducement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"47 3","pages":"2-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undue Inducement and Disparate Impact: A Collectivist Account\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Bobier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eahr.60002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>There is consensus that an inducement to participate in clinical research is undue if it compromises individual decision-making, thereby undermining voluntariness—a would-be research participant is made an excessive offer that prevents him or her from deciding well, however that is understood. I set forth and defend a view that conceptualizes inducements as undue if they result in the disparate enrollment of a protected class of individuals. I argue that this new conception avoids the problems with the standard view, is easy to operationalize, and clarifies the relation between exploitation and undue inducement.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics & human research\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"2-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics & human research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们一致认为,如果参与临床研究的动机损害了个人的决策,从而破坏了自愿性,那么这种动机是不适当的——潜在的研究参与者被给予了过高的报酬,妨碍了他或她做出正确的决定,然而这是可以理解的。我提出并捍卫了这样一种观点,即如果激励措施导致受保护的个人阶层的不同入学,那么它们就是不正当的。我认为这个新概念避免了标准观点的问题,易于操作,并澄清了剥削与不当诱导之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undue Inducement and Disparate Impact: A Collectivist Account

There is consensus that an inducement to participate in clinical research is undue if it compromises individual decision-making, thereby undermining voluntariness—a would-be research participant is made an excessive offer that prevents him or her from deciding well, however that is understood. I set forth and defend a view that conceptualizes inducements as undue if they result in the disparate enrollment of a protected class of individuals. I argue that this new conception avoids the problems with the standard view, is easy to operationalize, and clarifies the relation between exploitation and undue inducement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信