道路交通碰撞中的车辆解救:对南非先进医疗救援服务的描述性分析

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Naseef Abdullah , Jaydon Rose , Egnall Brown , Heike Geduld
{"title":"道路交通碰撞中的车辆解救:对南非先进医疗救援服务的描述性分析","authors":"Naseef Abdullah ,&nbsp;Jaydon Rose ,&nbsp;Egnall Brown ,&nbsp;Heike Geduld","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Road Traffic Crashes (RTCs) represent a significant global health challenge, with a disproportionate burden on low- and middle-income countries. Vehicle extrication is a critical Emergency Medical Service (EMS) intervention enabling early assessment and treatment of entrapped patients but remains understudied in resource-limited settings despite its potential impact on patient outcomes. This study describes the RTC extrication burden managed by a public sector EMS in the Western Cape, South Africa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of Computer-Aided-Dispatch (CAD) and a paper-based rescue case record data related to the extrication practises of 97 Advanced Medical Rescuers stationed across 25 rescue stations throughout the Western Cape of South Africa. Standard descriptive statistical procedures were applied to all variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2,587,979 EMS activations during the study period, 23,899 (0.9 %) required specialised medical rescue activations, and 11,699 (0.5 %) were for transport-related emergencies. Of these, 719 (6.1 %) cases necessitated vehicle extrication. Light motor vehicles accounted for most extrications (78.2 %, <em>n</em> = 562), while heavy motor vehicles showed higher proportional extrication rates (127.5 vs. 75.8 extrications per 1,000 RTCs). Peak rescue activations occurred between 08h00 and 20h00 (11.9 %, <em>n</em> = 1,388). The predominant extrication techniques were vehicle stabilisation (24.9 %, <em>n</em> = 501), third-door conversion (23.9 %, <em>n</em> = 482 ), and dashboard lift (13.9 %, <em>n</em> = 282). Most patients (83.1 %, <em>n</em> = 24,588) presented with routine (green) or non-urgent (yellow) acuity, though rural areas exhibited a higher proportion of high-acuity cases</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This first comprehensive analysis of the RTC extrication burden in a South African province reveals significant spatial and temporal variations in rescue needs and techniques. Our findings provide valuable extrication-related data to inform targeted training programs, standardised extrication protocols, and strategic resource allocation to enhance EMS capabilities in resource-limited settings. These insights provide a foundation for workforce planning and specialised training to improve outcomes for entrapped RTC patients in similar contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 621-627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vehicle extrication in road traffic crashes: a descriptive analysis of an advanced medical rescue service in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Naseef Abdullah ,&nbsp;Jaydon Rose ,&nbsp;Egnall Brown ,&nbsp;Heike Geduld\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afjem.2025.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Road Traffic Crashes (RTCs) represent a significant global health challenge, with a disproportionate burden on low- and middle-income countries. Vehicle extrication is a critical Emergency Medical Service (EMS) intervention enabling early assessment and treatment of entrapped patients but remains understudied in resource-limited settings despite its potential impact on patient outcomes. This study describes the RTC extrication burden managed by a public sector EMS in the Western Cape, South Africa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of Computer-Aided-Dispatch (CAD) and a paper-based rescue case record data related to the extrication practises of 97 Advanced Medical Rescuers stationed across 25 rescue stations throughout the Western Cape of South Africa. Standard descriptive statistical procedures were applied to all variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2,587,979 EMS activations during the study period, 23,899 (0.9 %) required specialised medical rescue activations, and 11,699 (0.5 %) were for transport-related emergencies. Of these, 719 (6.1 %) cases necessitated vehicle extrication. Light motor vehicles accounted for most extrications (78.2 %, <em>n</em> = 562), while heavy motor vehicles showed higher proportional extrication rates (127.5 vs. 75.8 extrications per 1,000 RTCs). Peak rescue activations occurred between 08h00 and 20h00 (11.9 %, <em>n</em> = 1,388). The predominant extrication techniques were vehicle stabilisation (24.9 %, <em>n</em> = 501), third-door conversion (23.9 %, <em>n</em> = 482 ), and dashboard lift (13.9 %, <em>n</em> = 282). Most patients (83.1 %, <em>n</em> = 24,588) presented with routine (green) or non-urgent (yellow) acuity, though rural areas exhibited a higher proportion of high-acuity cases</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This first comprehensive analysis of the RTC extrication burden in a South African province reveals significant spatial and temporal variations in rescue needs and techniques. Our findings provide valuable extrication-related data to inform targeted training programs, standardised extrication protocols, and strategic resource allocation to enhance EMS capabilities in resource-limited settings. These insights provide a foundation for workforce planning and specialised training to improve outcomes for entrapped RTC patients in similar contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 621-627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X25000151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X25000151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道路交通碰撞是一项重大的全球卫生挑战,对低收入和中等收入国家造成了不成比例的负担。车辆解救是一项关键的紧急医疗服务(EMS)干预措施,能够早期评估和治疗被困患者,但在资源有限的环境中,尽管其对患者预后有潜在影响,但仍未得到充分研究。本研究描述了南非西开普省公共部门EMS管理的RTC解脱负担。方法回顾性分析了南非西开普省25个救援站的97名高级医疗救援人员的计算机辅助调度(CAD)和纸质救援病例记录数据。所有变量均采用标准描述性统计程序。结果在研究期间的2,587,979次EMS激活中,23,899次(0.9%)需要专门的医疗救援激活,11,699次(0.5%)用于与运输相关的紧急情况。其中,719例(6.1%)需要车辆搭救。轻型机动车辆占大多数(78.2%,n = 562),而重型机动车辆的比例解救率更高(每1,000 rtc有127.5对75.8次解救)。高峰救援活动发生在08:00至20h00之间(11.9%,n = 1388)。主要的解救方法是车辆稳定(24.9%,n = 501)、第三门转换(23.9%,n = 482)和仪表板提升(13.9%,n = 282)。大多数患者(83.1%,n = 24,588)表现为常规(绿色)或非紧急(黄色)视力,尽管农村地区表现出较高比例的高视力病例。结论:对南非省RTC解脱负担的首次综合分析显示,在救援需求和技术方面存在显著的时空差异。我们的研究结果为有针对性的培训计划、标准化的急救方案和战略性资源分配提供了有价值的相关数据,以提高资源有限环境下急救服务的能力。这些见解为劳动力规划和专业培训提供了基础,以改善类似情况下被困RTC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vehicle extrication in road traffic crashes: a descriptive analysis of an advanced medical rescue service in South Africa

Introduction

Road Traffic Crashes (RTCs) represent a significant global health challenge, with a disproportionate burden on low- and middle-income countries. Vehicle extrication is a critical Emergency Medical Service (EMS) intervention enabling early assessment and treatment of entrapped patients but remains understudied in resource-limited settings despite its potential impact on patient outcomes. This study describes the RTC extrication burden managed by a public sector EMS in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of Computer-Aided-Dispatch (CAD) and a paper-based rescue case record data related to the extrication practises of 97 Advanced Medical Rescuers stationed across 25 rescue stations throughout the Western Cape of South Africa. Standard descriptive statistical procedures were applied to all variables.

Results

Of 2,587,979 EMS activations during the study period, 23,899 (0.9 %) required specialised medical rescue activations, and 11,699 (0.5 %) were for transport-related emergencies. Of these, 719 (6.1 %) cases necessitated vehicle extrication. Light motor vehicles accounted for most extrications (78.2 %, n = 562), while heavy motor vehicles showed higher proportional extrication rates (127.5 vs. 75.8 extrications per 1,000 RTCs). Peak rescue activations occurred between 08h00 and 20h00 (11.9 %, n = 1,388). The predominant extrication techniques were vehicle stabilisation (24.9 %, n = 501), third-door conversion (23.9 %, n = 482 ), and dashboard lift (13.9 %, n = 282). Most patients (83.1 %, n = 24,588) presented with routine (green) or non-urgent (yellow) acuity, though rural areas exhibited a higher proportion of high-acuity cases

Conclusion

This first comprehensive analysis of the RTC extrication burden in a South African province reveals significant spatial and temporal variations in rescue needs and techniques. Our findings provide valuable extrication-related data to inform targeted training programs, standardised extrication protocols, and strategic resource allocation to enhance EMS capabilities in resource-limited settings. These insights provide a foundation for workforce planning and specialised training to improve outcomes for entrapped RTC patients in similar contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信