转售还是代理销售?奢侈品行业非欺骗性仿冒品的含义

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Zhennan Yuan , Lina Bao
{"title":"转售还是代理销售?奢侈品行业非欺骗性仿冒品的含义","authors":"Zhennan Yuan ,&nbsp;Lina Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies selling format choice for authentic product in the presence of non-deceptive counterfeit. Specifically, we consider a platform supply chain where a brand manufacturer and a counterfeiter can sell their products through a common e-platform. Two prevalent selling formats are offered in the market, i.e., reselling and agency selling formats. By developing a game-theoretical model, we explore how the existence of counterfeit would affect the selling format preferences of each party, the equilibrium selling mode and the strategic insights into their different choices. The findings show that the selling format choices would be jointly affected by the commission rate and the imitation level. Interestingly, we find that if the counterfeit is highly imitative to the authentic product, the manufacturer still prefers the agency selling format despite a high commission rate. Moreover, when the commission rate and the imitation level are not very high, the manufacturer/counterfeiter wants to sell through the agency selling format while its competitor chooses the reselling format. However, in equilibrium, we show that both parties would choose the agency selling format, leading to sub-optimal performances or even the prisoner’s dilemma in this scenario. Our insight also implies that the counterfeiter would not necessarily benefit from selling a highly imitated product. The more it imitates, the less profitable it may be in equilibrium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"286 ","pages":"Article 109649"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reselling or agency selling? The implication of non-deceptive counterfeits in the luxury industry\",\"authors\":\"Zhennan Yuan ,&nbsp;Lina Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper studies selling format choice for authentic product in the presence of non-deceptive counterfeit. Specifically, we consider a platform supply chain where a brand manufacturer and a counterfeiter can sell their products through a common e-platform. Two prevalent selling formats are offered in the market, i.e., reselling and agency selling formats. By developing a game-theoretical model, we explore how the existence of counterfeit would affect the selling format preferences of each party, the equilibrium selling mode and the strategic insights into their different choices. The findings show that the selling format choices would be jointly affected by the commission rate and the imitation level. Interestingly, we find that if the counterfeit is highly imitative to the authentic product, the manufacturer still prefers the agency selling format despite a high commission rate. Moreover, when the commission rate and the imitation level are not very high, the manufacturer/counterfeiter wants to sell through the agency selling format while its competitor chooses the reselling format. However, in equilibrium, we show that both parties would choose the agency selling format, leading to sub-optimal performances or even the prisoner’s dilemma in this scenario. Our insight also implies that the counterfeiter would not necessarily benefit from selling a highly imitated product. The more it imitates, the less profitable it may be in equilibrium.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"volume\":\"286 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了在非欺骗性假货存在的情况下正品销售形式的选择。具体来说,我们考虑一个平台供应链,其中品牌制造商和造假者可以通过一个共同的电子平台销售他们的产品。市场上有两种流行的销售模式,即转售和代理销售模式。本文通过建立博弈论模型,探讨了假冒产品的存在如何影响交易各方的销售形式偏好、均衡销售模式以及交易各方不同选择的战略洞见。研究发现,销售模式的选择会受到佣金率和模仿水平的共同影响。有趣的是,我们发现,如果仿冒品与正品高度相似,尽管佣金率很高,制造商仍然倾向于代理销售形式。而且,当佣金率和仿制水平不是很高时,制造商/造假者希望通过代理销售模式进行销售,而其竞争对手则选择转售模式。然而,在均衡情况下,我们发现双方都会选择代理销售形式,从而导致次优绩效甚至陷入囚徒困境。我们的见解还表明,制假者不一定会从销售高度仿造的产品中获益。它模仿得越多,在均衡状态下的利润可能就越少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reselling or agency selling? The implication of non-deceptive counterfeits in the luxury industry
This paper studies selling format choice for authentic product in the presence of non-deceptive counterfeit. Specifically, we consider a platform supply chain where a brand manufacturer and a counterfeiter can sell their products through a common e-platform. Two prevalent selling formats are offered in the market, i.e., reselling and agency selling formats. By developing a game-theoretical model, we explore how the existence of counterfeit would affect the selling format preferences of each party, the equilibrium selling mode and the strategic insights into their different choices. The findings show that the selling format choices would be jointly affected by the commission rate and the imitation level. Interestingly, we find that if the counterfeit is highly imitative to the authentic product, the manufacturer still prefers the agency selling format despite a high commission rate. Moreover, when the commission rate and the imitation level are not very high, the manufacturer/counterfeiter wants to sell through the agency selling format while its competitor chooses the reselling format. However, in equilibrium, we show that both parties would choose the agency selling format, leading to sub-optimal performances or even the prisoner’s dilemma in this scenario. Our insight also implies that the counterfeiter would not necessarily benefit from selling a highly imitated product. The more it imitates, the less profitable it may be in equilibrium.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信