急诊科腹痛评估中医师年龄与影像学应用的关系

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lauren B. Querin MD, MEd , Alyssa McGary MS , Nicole R. Hodgson MD , Ryan Allen BA , Wayne A. Martini MD
{"title":"急诊科腹痛评估中医师年龄与影像学应用的关系","authors":"Lauren B. Querin MD, MEd ,&nbsp;Alyssa McGary MS ,&nbsp;Nicole R. Hodgson MD ,&nbsp;Ryan Allen BA ,&nbsp;Wayne A. Martini MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Emergency department (ED) workup of abdominal pain commonly utilizes substantial healthcare resources including laboratory tests and advanced imaging. Although studies have explored various characteristics that influence resource utilization, the relationship between physician age and use of imaging modalities is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Determine the correlation between physician age and ordering of abdominal imaging in the ED.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We extracted data from 5 years of patient visits across multiple EDs. The primary outcome was use of abdominal imaging, with secondary outcomes of hospital admission, ED length of stay (LOS), and 72-h revisits. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess binary outcomes, and multivariable linear regression was used for LOS. Physician age was categorized into cohorts of &lt;36, 36-44, 45-54, ≥55 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evaluation of 91,922 unique encounters revealed that the most senior physicians had lower odds of ordering imaging than younger physicians of any group and had lower odds of 72-h revisits with no difference in admission or ED LOS when compared to physicians &lt;36 years. The middle groups (36–44 and 45–54 years) had higher odds of hospital admission than the youngest. The 2 most senior groups had lower odds of 72-h ED revisits than physicians &lt;36 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain, more senior physicians utilize fewer imaging resources, have fewer 72-h revisits, while maintaining equivalent hospital admissions and ED LOS as the youngest cohort of physicians. Further research is needed to discern what specific features of senior physicians contribute to the associations highlighted in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Physician Age and Imaging Utilization in Emergency Department Abdominal Pain Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Lauren B. Querin MD, MEd ,&nbsp;Alyssa McGary MS ,&nbsp;Nicole R. Hodgson MD ,&nbsp;Ryan Allen BA ,&nbsp;Wayne A. Martini MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.11.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Emergency department (ED) workup of abdominal pain commonly utilizes substantial healthcare resources including laboratory tests and advanced imaging. Although studies have explored various characteristics that influence resource utilization, the relationship between physician age and use of imaging modalities is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Determine the correlation between physician age and ordering of abdominal imaging in the ED.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We extracted data from 5 years of patient visits across multiple EDs. The primary outcome was use of abdominal imaging, with secondary outcomes of hospital admission, ED length of stay (LOS), and 72-h revisits. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess binary outcomes, and multivariable linear regression was used for LOS. Physician age was categorized into cohorts of &lt;36, 36-44, 45-54, ≥55 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evaluation of 91,922 unique encounters revealed that the most senior physicians had lower odds of ordering imaging than younger physicians of any group and had lower odds of 72-h revisits with no difference in admission or ED LOS when compared to physicians &lt;36 years. The middle groups (36–44 and 45–54 years) had higher odds of hospital admission than the youngest. The 2 most senior groups had lower odds of 72-h ED revisits than physicians &lt;36 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain, more senior physicians utilize fewer imaging resources, have fewer 72-h revisits, while maintaining equivalent hospital admissions and ED LOS as the youngest cohort of physicians. Further research is needed to discern what specific features of senior physicians contribute to the associations highlighted in this study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073646792400369X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073646792400369X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急诊科(ED)对腹痛的检查通常需要大量的医疗资源,包括实验室检查和高级影像学检查。尽管研究已经探索了影响资源利用的各种特征,但医生年龄与成像方式使用之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:确定医生年龄与急诊科腹部影像学安排的相关性。方法:我们提取了5年来多个急诊科的患者就诊数据。主要结局是腹部影像的使用,次要结局是住院情况、急诊科住院时间(LOS)和72小时复诊。二元结果采用多变量logistic回归,LOS采用多变量线性回归。医师年龄分为36岁、36-44岁、45-54岁和≥55岁。结果对91,922例独特就诊的评估显示,在任何一组中,最年长的医生比年轻的医生有更低的要求进行影像学检查的几率,并且与36岁的医生相比,入院和ED LOS没有差异,72小时的复诊几率更低。中间组(36-44岁和45-54岁)的住院率高于最年轻组。年龄最大的两组患者就诊72小时的几率低于36岁的内科医生。结论对于以腹痛就诊于急诊科的患者,更资深的医生使用更少的影像资源,更少的72小时就诊次数,同时保持与最年轻的医生相同的住院率和急诊科LOS。需要进一步的研究来辨别高级医生的哪些具体特征有助于本研究中强调的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Physician Age and Imaging Utilization in Emergency Department Abdominal Pain Evaluation

Background

Emergency department (ED) workup of abdominal pain commonly utilizes substantial healthcare resources including laboratory tests and advanced imaging. Although studies have explored various characteristics that influence resource utilization, the relationship between physician age and use of imaging modalities is unclear.

Objectives

Determine the correlation between physician age and ordering of abdominal imaging in the ED.

Methods

We extracted data from 5 years of patient visits across multiple EDs. The primary outcome was use of abdominal imaging, with secondary outcomes of hospital admission, ED length of stay (LOS), and 72-h revisits. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess binary outcomes, and multivariable linear regression was used for LOS. Physician age was categorized into cohorts of <36, 36-44, 45-54, ≥55 years.

Results

Evaluation of 91,922 unique encounters revealed that the most senior physicians had lower odds of ordering imaging than younger physicians of any group and had lower odds of 72-h revisits with no difference in admission or ED LOS when compared to physicians <36 years. The middle groups (36–44 and 45–54 years) had higher odds of hospital admission than the youngest. The 2 most senior groups had lower odds of 72-h ED revisits than physicians <36 years.

Conclusion

For patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain, more senior physicians utilize fewer imaging resources, have fewer 72-h revisits, while maintaining equivalent hospital admissions and ED LOS as the youngest cohort of physicians. Further research is needed to discern what specific features of senior physicians contribute to the associations highlighted in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信