{"title":"元素试验中正常固结土的封闭形式低塑性溶液","authors":"Chengwei Zhu, Shun Wang, Wei Wu, Chong Peng","doi":"10.1002/nag.3994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hypoplastic theory has gained significant attraction in the geomechanics community for constitutive modeling and numerical simulation. However, the absence of an analytical benchmark for numerical simulations incorporating the hypoplastic model remains a notable gap. This study revisits the basic hypoplastic model for normally consolidated soil, as proposed by Wu et al., by providing explicit formulations of the failure criterion and material parameters. Furthermore, closed‐form hypoplastic solutions are derived for normally consolidated soil in three elemental tests: oedometer, simple shear and true triaxial tests. The solutions are assessed by comparing the analytical results with numerical integration and geotechnical test data. Additionally, a novel formula for estimating the at‐rest earth pressure coefficient is derived, and compared to the widely adopted Jaky equation. Our solutions not only provide insights into hypoplastic model enhancement but also serve as robust benchmarks for numerical implementations.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closed‐Form Hypoplastic Solutions for Normally Consolidated Soil in Element Tests\",\"authors\":\"Chengwei Zhu, Shun Wang, Wei Wu, Chong Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.3994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hypoplastic theory has gained significant attraction in the geomechanics community for constitutive modeling and numerical simulation. However, the absence of an analytical benchmark for numerical simulations incorporating the hypoplastic model remains a notable gap. This study revisits the basic hypoplastic model for normally consolidated soil, as proposed by Wu et al., by providing explicit formulations of the failure criterion and material parameters. Furthermore, closed‐form hypoplastic solutions are derived for normally consolidated soil in three elemental tests: oedometer, simple shear and true triaxial tests. The solutions are assessed by comparing the analytical results with numerical integration and geotechnical test data. Additionally, a novel formula for estimating the at‐rest earth pressure coefficient is derived, and compared to the widely adopted Jaky equation. Our solutions not only provide insights into hypoplastic model enhancement but also serve as robust benchmarks for numerical implementations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3994\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Closed‐Form Hypoplastic Solutions for Normally Consolidated Soil in Element Tests
The hypoplastic theory has gained significant attraction in the geomechanics community for constitutive modeling and numerical simulation. However, the absence of an analytical benchmark for numerical simulations incorporating the hypoplastic model remains a notable gap. This study revisits the basic hypoplastic model for normally consolidated soil, as proposed by Wu et al., by providing explicit formulations of the failure criterion and material parameters. Furthermore, closed‐form hypoplastic solutions are derived for normally consolidated soil in three elemental tests: oedometer, simple shear and true triaxial tests. The solutions are assessed by comparing the analytical results with numerical integration and geotechnical test data. Additionally, a novel formula for estimating the at‐rest earth pressure coefficient is derived, and compared to the widely adopted Jaky equation. Our solutions not only provide insights into hypoplastic model enhancement but also serve as robust benchmarks for numerical implementations.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.