Dupilumab在2型哮喘和早期Feno水平降低患者中的疗效

Ian D. Pavord MD , Michael E. Wechsler MD , William W. Busse MD , Christian Domingo MD , Changming Xia PhD , Rebecca Gall MD , Nami Pandit-Abid PharmD , Juby A. Jacob-Nara MD, DHSc , Amr Radwan MBBChir , Paul J. Rowe MD , Yamo Deniz MD
{"title":"Dupilumab在2型哮喘和早期Feno水平降低患者中的疗效","authors":"Ian D. Pavord MD ,&nbsp;Michael E. Wechsler MD ,&nbsp;William W. Busse MD ,&nbsp;Christian Domingo MD ,&nbsp;Changming Xia PhD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Gall MD ,&nbsp;Nami Pandit-Abid PharmD ,&nbsp;Juby A. Jacob-Nara MD, DHSc ,&nbsp;Amr Radwan MBBChir ,&nbsp;Paul J. Rowe MD ,&nbsp;Yamo Deniz MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The QUEST (<span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> identifier NCT02414854) and TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) studies demonstrated the efficacy of dupilumab, 200 or 300 mg, versus placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks (QUEST) and dupilumab, 300 mg, for an additional 96 weeks (TRAVERSE) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This analysis assessed dupilumab efficacy in patients from QUEST who enrolled in TRAVERSE and were stratified by a reduction in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F<span>eno</span>) level by week 2 of QUEST.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with an F<span>eno</span> level of at least 25 ppb at parent study baseline (PSBL) were defined as those with or without a minimally important F<span>eno</span> level reduction/response (a ≥20% reduction in patients with an F<span>eno</span> level of ≥50 ppb and a reduction of &gt;10 ppb in those with an F<span>eno</span> level of &lt;50 ppb at PSBL) by week 2 of QUEST. We assessed annualized severe exacerbation rates (AERs) and changes from PSBL in prebronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> value, 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During QUEST, dupilumab (compared with placebo) reduced AER by 58% to 59% across F<span>eno</span> response subgroups (unadjusted AER = 0.392-0.523 for dupilumab vs 1.052-1.280 for placebo) and improved prebronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> value regardless of F<span>eno</span> response. These improvements were sustained during TRAVERSE, with a slightly greater magnitude in F<span>eno</span> responders. Dupilumab also improved 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores independently of F<span>eno</span> responses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in patients with and without a minimally important early reduction in F<span>eno</span> level. Greater improvements were seen in patients with an early reduction in F<span>eno</span> level, but patients without such a reduction also showed favorable outcomes during their treatment with dupilumab.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dupilumab efficacy in patients with type 2 asthma and early Feno level reductions\",\"authors\":\"Ian D. Pavord MD ,&nbsp;Michael E. Wechsler MD ,&nbsp;William W. Busse MD ,&nbsp;Christian Domingo MD ,&nbsp;Changming Xia PhD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Gall MD ,&nbsp;Nami Pandit-Abid PharmD ,&nbsp;Juby A. Jacob-Nara MD, DHSc ,&nbsp;Amr Radwan MBBChir ,&nbsp;Paul J. Rowe MD ,&nbsp;Yamo Deniz MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The QUEST (<span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> identifier NCT02414854) and TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) studies demonstrated the efficacy of dupilumab, 200 or 300 mg, versus placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks (QUEST) and dupilumab, 300 mg, for an additional 96 weeks (TRAVERSE) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This analysis assessed dupilumab efficacy in patients from QUEST who enrolled in TRAVERSE and were stratified by a reduction in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F<span>eno</span>) level by week 2 of QUEST.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with an F<span>eno</span> level of at least 25 ppb at parent study baseline (PSBL) were defined as those with or without a minimally important F<span>eno</span> level reduction/response (a ≥20% reduction in patients with an F<span>eno</span> level of ≥50 ppb and a reduction of &gt;10 ppb in those with an F<span>eno</span> level of &lt;50 ppb at PSBL) by week 2 of QUEST. We assessed annualized severe exacerbation rates (AERs) and changes from PSBL in prebronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> value, 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During QUEST, dupilumab (compared with placebo) reduced AER by 58% to 59% across F<span>eno</span> response subgroups (unadjusted AER = 0.392-0.523 for dupilumab vs 1.052-1.280 for placebo) and improved prebronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> value regardless of F<span>eno</span> response. These improvements were sustained during TRAVERSE, with a slightly greater magnitude in F<span>eno</span> responders. Dupilumab also improved 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores independently of F<span>eno</span> responses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in patients with and without a minimally important early reduction in F<span>eno</span> level. Greater improvements were seen in patients with an early reduction in F<span>eno</span> level, but patients without such a reduction also showed favorable outcomes during their treatment with dupilumab.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277282932500075X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277282932500075X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

QUEST (ClinicalTrials.gov识别号NCT02414854)和TRAVERSE (NCT02134028)研究表明,dupilumab 200或300 mg与安慰剂(每2周治疗52周,QUEST)和dupilumab 300 mg治疗96周(TRAVERSE)相比,在未控制的中重度哮喘患者中具有疗效。目的:本分析评估了来自QUEST的患者的dupilumab疗效,这些患者入组TRAVERSE,并通过QUEST第2周时分数呼出一氧化氮(Feno)水平的降低进行分层。方法:在母体研究基线(PSBL)中Feno水平至少为25 ppb的患者被定义为在QUEST的第2周有或没有最低程度的Feno水平降低/反应(Feno水平≥50 ppb的患者降低≥20%,PSBL中Feno水平为50 ppb的患者降低≤10 ppb)。我们评估了支气管扩张剂前FEV1值、5项哮喘控制问卷评分和哮喘生活质量问卷评分的年化严重加重率(AERs)和PSBL的变化。结果在QUEST期间,dupilumab(与安慰剂相比)在Feno反应亚组中降低了58%至59%的AER(未调整的AER = 0.392-0.523, dupilumab为1.052-1.280),并且改善了支气管扩张剂前FEV1值,无论Feno反应如何。这些改善在TRAVERSE期间持续存在,Feno应答者的改善幅度略大。Dupilumab还改善了独立于Feno反应的5项哮喘控制问卷和哮喘生活质量问卷得分。结论:dupilumab在有或没有最低限度重要的早期Feno水平降低的患者中持续疗效长达3年。早期Feno水平降低的患者有更大的改善,但没有这种降低的患者在dupilumab治疗期间也显示出良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dupilumab efficacy in patients with type 2 asthma and early Feno level reductions

Background

The QUEST (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02414854) and TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) studies demonstrated the efficacy of dupilumab, 200 or 300 mg, versus placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks (QUEST) and dupilumab, 300 mg, for an additional 96 weeks (TRAVERSE) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.

Objective

This analysis assessed dupilumab efficacy in patients from QUEST who enrolled in TRAVERSE and were stratified by a reduction in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) level by week 2 of QUEST.

Methods

Patients with an Feno level of at least 25 ppb at parent study baseline (PSBL) were defined as those with or without a minimally important Feno level reduction/response (a ≥20% reduction in patients with an Feno level of ≥50 ppb and a reduction of >10 ppb in those with an Feno level of <50 ppb at PSBL) by week 2 of QUEST. We assessed annualized severe exacerbation rates (AERs) and changes from PSBL in prebronchodilator FEV1 value, 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score.

Results

During QUEST, dupilumab (compared with placebo) reduced AER by 58% to 59% across Feno response subgroups (unadjusted AER = 0.392-0.523 for dupilumab vs 1.052-1.280 for placebo) and improved prebronchodilator FEV1 value regardless of Feno response. These improvements were sustained during TRAVERSE, with a slightly greater magnitude in Feno responders. Dupilumab also improved 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores independently of Feno responses.

Conclusion

Dupilumab sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in patients with and without a minimally important early reduction in Feno level. Greater improvements were seen in patients with an early reduction in Feno level, but patients without such a reduction also showed favorable outcomes during their treatment with dupilumab.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信