纵向差异化双头垄断中具有战略企业社会责任的技术许可

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Dongdong Li, Wenyao Lin, Chenxuan Shang
{"title":"纵向差异化双头垄断中具有战略企业社会责任的技术许可","authors":"Dongdong Li,&nbsp;Wenyao Lin,&nbsp;Chenxuan Shang","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this paper, we study the impact of strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on the optimal licensing strategy for cost-reducing technology in a vertically differentiated duopoly. We compare three types of licensing strategies—fixed fee, royalty, and two-part tariff—under three CSR strategy structures: ST model (only firm 1 adopts a CSR strategy), TS model (only firm 2 adopts a CSR strategy), and SS model (both firms adopt CSR strategies). The results show that the licensor prefers fixed-fee licensing when it adopts a CSR strategy (i.e., ST and SS) but opts for two-part tariff licensing when it does not (i.e., TS). We also find that the optimal licensing contract leads to higher social welfare under the CSR compliance strategy than under the mixed CSR strategy. Finally, we show that firms endogenously choose the CSR compliance strategy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 3","pages":"547-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology Licensing With Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly\",\"authors\":\"Dongdong Li,&nbsp;Wenyao Lin,&nbsp;Chenxuan Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajes.12620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In this paper, we study the impact of strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on the optimal licensing strategy for cost-reducing technology in a vertically differentiated duopoly. We compare three types of licensing strategies—fixed fee, royalty, and two-part tariff—under three CSR strategy structures: ST model (only firm 1 adopts a CSR strategy), TS model (only firm 2 adopts a CSR strategy), and SS model (both firms adopt CSR strategies). The results show that the licensor prefers fixed-fee licensing when it adopts a CSR strategy (i.e., ST and SS) but opts for two-part tariff licensing when it does not (i.e., TS). We also find that the optimal licensing contract leads to higher social welfare under the CSR compliance strategy than under the mixed CSR strategy. Finally, we show that firms endogenously choose the CSR compliance strategy.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"547-566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12620\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了垂直差异化双寡头环境下战略性企业社会责任活动对降低技术成本的最优许可策略的影响。在三种企业社会责任战略结构下,我们比较了三种类型的许可策略——固定费用、特许权使用费和两部分关税:ST模型(只有企业1采用企业社会责任战略)、TS模型(只有企业2采用企业社会责任战略)和SS模型(两家企业都采用企业社会责任战略)。结果表明,当许可方采用企业社会责任策略(即ST和SS)时,许可方倾向于固定费用许可,而当许可方不采用企业社会责任策略(即TS)时,许可方选择两部分关税许可。我们还发现,企业社会责任合规策略下的最优许可契约比混合企业社会责任策略下的最优许可契约带来更高的社会福利。最后,我们证明了企业社会责任合规战略的内生选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology Licensing With Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly

In this paper, we study the impact of strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on the optimal licensing strategy for cost-reducing technology in a vertically differentiated duopoly. We compare three types of licensing strategies—fixed fee, royalty, and two-part tariff—under three CSR strategy structures: ST model (only firm 1 adopts a CSR strategy), TS model (only firm 2 adopts a CSR strategy), and SS model (both firms adopt CSR strategies). The results show that the licensor prefers fixed-fee licensing when it adopts a CSR strategy (i.e., ST and SS) but opts for two-part tariff licensing when it does not (i.e., TS). We also find that the optimal licensing contract leads to higher social welfare under the CSR compliance strategy than under the mixed CSR strategy. Finally, we show that firms endogenously choose the CSR compliance strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信