Mary E. Brushe, Murthy N. Mittinty, Tess Gregory, Dandara Haag, John W. Lynch, Sheena Reilly, Edward Melhuish, Sally A. Brinkman
{"title":"亲子互动对3、4岁儿童语言发展的因果影响","authors":"Mary E. Brushe, Murthy N. Mittinty, Tess Gregory, Dandara Haag, John W. Lynch, Sheena Reilly, Edward Melhuish, Sally A. Brinkman","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Language development is critical for children's life chances. Promoting parent–child interactions is suggested as one mechanism to support language development in the early years. However, limited evidence exists for a causal effect of parent–child interactions on children's language development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the Language in Little Ones study, an Australian prospective birth cohort study (<i>n</i> = 296), was used to determine the sustained effect of parent–child interactions over time on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, measured using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool-2 (CELF-P2) language assessment. Marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weights were used to allow observational data to emulate a randomised controlled trial by accounting for time-varying exposures and confounding. These results were then used to estimate the effect of several hypothetical scenarios where the exposure was fixed for the whole population at different levels (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile) across the observed distribution of parent–child interactions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Findings supported a causal effect of parent–child interactions from 6 to 36 (or 48) months on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, in a population of children without language impairment. The counterfactual language score at 48 months increased from 97.21 (95% CI 96.86, 97.56) for the scenario fixed at the 5th percentile to 102.15 (95% CI 101.80, 102.50) at the 50th percentile and 111.41 (95% CI 111.06, 111.76) at the 95th percentile.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although the effects of parent–child interactions on later language were small they do offer one mechanism to support early language development. These findings are discussed within the context of existing interventions to highlight the value of investment into sustained, universal prevention efforts for supporting early language.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Promoting parent–child interactions within the home environment has been previously suggested as one mechanism to support children's early language development. Nonetheless, there is a lack of causal evidence and long-term follow-up to support this claim.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The effect of parent–child interactions throughout the early years on children's language development is explored using causal inference methodology within an Australian prospective birth cohort study. Findings show a small causal effect of increasing parent–child interactions on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, after controlling for time-varying exposures and confounders.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This highlights the value of sustained, universal early intervention, which encourages back-and-forth parent–child interactions, as early as possible. Practitioners who work with parents and carers in the first year of a child's life should promote the importance of talking and interacting with their child to improve later language outcomes.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Causal Effect of Parent–Child Interactions on Child Language Development at 3 and 4 Years\",\"authors\":\"Mary E. Brushe, Murthy N. Mittinty, Tess Gregory, Dandara Haag, John W. Lynch, Sheena Reilly, Edward Melhuish, Sally A. Brinkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Language development is critical for children's life chances. Promoting parent–child interactions is suggested as one mechanism to support language development in the early years. However, limited evidence exists for a causal effect of parent–child interactions on children's language development.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from the Language in Little Ones study, an Australian prospective birth cohort study (<i>n</i> = 296), was used to determine the sustained effect of parent–child interactions over time on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, measured using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool-2 (CELF-P2) language assessment. Marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weights were used to allow observational data to emulate a randomised controlled trial by accounting for time-varying exposures and confounding. These results were then used to estimate the effect of several hypothetical scenarios where the exposure was fixed for the whole population at different levels (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile) across the observed distribution of parent–child interactions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings supported a causal effect of parent–child interactions from 6 to 36 (or 48) months on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, in a population of children without language impairment. The counterfactual language score at 48 months increased from 97.21 (95% CI 96.86, 97.56) for the scenario fixed at the 5th percentile to 102.15 (95% CI 101.80, 102.50) at the 50th percentile and 111.41 (95% CI 111.06, 111.76) at the 95th percentile.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although the effects of parent–child interactions on later language were small they do offer one mechanism to support early language development. These findings are discussed within the context of existing interventions to highlight the value of investment into sustained, universal prevention efforts for supporting early language.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\\n \\n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Promoting parent–child interactions within the home environment has been previously suggested as one mechanism to support children's early language development. Nonetheless, there is a lack of causal evidence and long-term follow-up to support this claim.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n \\n <div><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The effect of parent–child interactions throughout the early years on children's language development is explored using causal inference methodology within an Australian prospective birth cohort study. Findings show a small causal effect of increasing parent–child interactions on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, after controlling for time-varying exposures and confounders.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n \\n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>This highlights the value of sustained, universal early intervention, which encourages back-and-forth parent–child interactions, as early as possible. Practitioners who work with parents and carers in the first year of a child's life should promote the importance of talking and interacting with their child to improve later language outcomes.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
语言发展对儿童的人生机遇至关重要。促进亲子互动被认为是支持早期语言发展的一种机制。然而,亲子互动对儿童语言发展的因果影响证据有限。方法使用来自澳大利亚前瞻性出生队列研究“幼儿语言研究”(n = 296)的数据,确定亲子互动随时间推移对36个月和48个月儿童语言发展的持续影响,使用学前2语言基础临床评估(CELF-P2)语言评估进行测量。使用边际结构模型和处理权重的逆概率,通过考虑时变暴露和混杂因素,允许观察数据模拟随机对照试验。然后,这些结果被用来估计在观察到的亲子互动分布中,暴露在不同水平(第5、25、50、75和95百分位)对整个人群固定的几种假设情景的影响。结果表明,在没有语言障碍的儿童中,6 - 36(或48)个月的亲子互动对36和48个月的儿童语言发展有因果影响。48个月时,反事实语言得分从第5个百分位的97.21 (95% CI 96.86, 97.56)增加到第50个百分位的102.15 (95% CI 101.80, 102.50)和第95个百分位的111.41 (95% CI 111.06, 111.76)。结论:虽然亲子互动对后期语言的影响很小,但它确实提供了一种支持早期语言发展的机制。这些发现在现有干预措施的背景下进行了讨论,以强调投资于支持早期语言的持续、普遍的预防工作的价值。在家庭环境中促进亲子互动已经被认为是支持儿童早期语言发展的一种机制。然而,缺乏因果证据和长期随访来支持这一说法。在澳大利亚的一项前瞻性出生队列研究中,使用因果推理方法探讨了早期亲子互动对儿童语言发展的影响。研究结果显示,在控制了时变暴露和混杂因素后,增加亲子互动对36个月和48个月大的儿童语言发展有很小的因果影响。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?这突出了持续的、普遍的早期干预的价值,它鼓励尽可能早地进行亲子之间的来回互动。在孩子生命的第一年与父母和照顾者一起工作的从业者应该促进与孩子交谈和互动的重要性,以提高以后的语言成绩。
The Causal Effect of Parent–Child Interactions on Child Language Development at 3 and 4 Years
Background
Language development is critical for children's life chances. Promoting parent–child interactions is suggested as one mechanism to support language development in the early years. However, limited evidence exists for a causal effect of parent–child interactions on children's language development.
Methods
Data from the Language in Little Ones study, an Australian prospective birth cohort study (n = 296), was used to determine the sustained effect of parent–child interactions over time on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, measured using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool-2 (CELF-P2) language assessment. Marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weights were used to allow observational data to emulate a randomised controlled trial by accounting for time-varying exposures and confounding. These results were then used to estimate the effect of several hypothetical scenarios where the exposure was fixed for the whole population at different levels (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile) across the observed distribution of parent–child interactions.
Results
Findings supported a causal effect of parent–child interactions from 6 to 36 (or 48) months on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, in a population of children without language impairment. The counterfactual language score at 48 months increased from 97.21 (95% CI 96.86, 97.56) for the scenario fixed at the 5th percentile to 102.15 (95% CI 101.80, 102.50) at the 50th percentile and 111.41 (95% CI 111.06, 111.76) at the 95th percentile.
Conclusions
Although the effects of parent–child interactions on later language were small they do offer one mechanism to support early language development. These findings are discussed within the context of existing interventions to highlight the value of investment into sustained, universal prevention efforts for supporting early language.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS
What is already known on the subject
Promoting parent–child interactions within the home environment has been previously suggested as one mechanism to support children's early language development. Nonetheless, there is a lack of causal evidence and long-term follow-up to support this claim.
What this paper adds to the existing knowledge
The effect of parent–child interactions throughout the early years on children's language development is explored using causal inference methodology within an Australian prospective birth cohort study. Findings show a small causal effect of increasing parent–child interactions on children's language development at 36 and 48 months, after controlling for time-varying exposures and confounders.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
This highlights the value of sustained, universal early intervention, which encourages back-and-forth parent–child interactions, as early as possible. Practitioners who work with parents and carers in the first year of a child's life should promote the importance of talking and interacting with their child to improve later language outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.