影响非洲裔美国人和撒哈拉以南非洲人体重指数差异的三个基因座

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Daniel Shriner, Amy R. Bentley, Ayo P. Doumatey, Jie Zhou, Guanjie Chen, Charles N. Rotimi, Adebowale A. Adeyemo
{"title":"影响非洲裔美国人和撒哈拉以南非洲人体重指数差异的三个基因座","authors":"Daniel Shriner,&nbsp;Amy R. Bentley,&nbsp;Ayo P. Doumatey,&nbsp;Jie Zhou,&nbsp;Guanjie Chen,&nbsp;Charles N. Rotimi,&nbsp;Adebowale A. Adeyemo","doi":"10.1002/gepi.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conventional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are designed to assess the effect of a genetic locus on phenotypic mean by genotype. Such loci explain a proportion of phenotypic variance known as narrow-sense heritability. In contrast, variance quantitative trait loci (vQTL) are associated with the phenotypic variance by genotype. These loci explain an additional proportion of phenotypic variance and contribute to broad-sense heritability but not to narrow-sense heritability. Here, a genome-wide vQTL analysis in 22,805 African Americans yielded eight loci for body mass index (BMI). Of these loci, three were replicated in 6002 sub-Saharan Africans. No locus reached genome-wide significance using the standard additive model. Furthermore, no locus showed evidence for natural selection, haplotype effects, or gene × sex or gene × study interactions. Two loci showed evidence for an effect of locus-specific ancestry resulting from admixture and for a gene × gene interaction. One locus showed evidence for interaction with diastolic blood pressure, consistent with this vQTL capturing an unmodeled gene × covariate interaction. These analyses demonstrate that relevant BMI loci can be detected by evaluating vQTL and that these loci contribute to the underexplored broad-sense heritability for this trait.</p>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Loci Affecting Variance of Body Mass Index in African Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Shriner,&nbsp;Amy R. Bentley,&nbsp;Ayo P. Doumatey,&nbsp;Jie Zhou,&nbsp;Guanjie Chen,&nbsp;Charles N. Rotimi,&nbsp;Adebowale A. Adeyemo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gepi.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Conventional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are designed to assess the effect of a genetic locus on phenotypic mean by genotype. Such loci explain a proportion of phenotypic variance known as narrow-sense heritability. In contrast, variance quantitative trait loci (vQTL) are associated with the phenotypic variance by genotype. These loci explain an additional proportion of phenotypic variance and contribute to broad-sense heritability but not to narrow-sense heritability. Here, a genome-wide vQTL analysis in 22,805 African Americans yielded eight loci for body mass index (BMI). Of these loci, three were replicated in 6002 sub-Saharan Africans. No locus reached genome-wide significance using the standard additive model. Furthermore, no locus showed evidence for natural selection, haplotype effects, or gene × sex or gene × study interactions. Two loci showed evidence for an effect of locus-specific ancestry resulting from admixture and for a gene × gene interaction. One locus showed evidence for interaction with diastolic blood pressure, consistent with this vQTL capturing an unmodeled gene × covariate interaction. These analyses demonstrate that relevant BMI loci can be detected by evaluating vQTL and that these loci contribute to the underexplored broad-sense heritability for this trait.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetic Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetic Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.70009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)旨在通过基因型评估遗传位点对表型平均值的影响。这样的基因座解释了被称为狭义遗传力的表型变异的一部分。相反,变异数量性状位点(vQTL)通过基因型与表型变异相关。这些基因座解释了表型变异的额外比例,并有助于广义遗传力,但不是狭义遗传力。在这里,对22,805名非裔美国人的全基因组vQTL分析得出了8个体重指数(BMI)位点。在这些基因座中,有三个在6002名撒哈拉以南非洲人身上得到了复制。使用标准加性模型,没有位点达到全基因组显著性。此外,没有证据表明基因座存在自然选择、单倍型效应、基因与性别或基因与研究的相互作用。两个基因座显示了由混合和基因×基因相互作用产生的位点特异性祖先效应的证据。一个位点显示出与舒张压相互作用的证据,这与该vQTL捕获未建模的基因×协变量相互作用一致。这些分析表明,通过评估vQTL可以检测到相关的BMI位点,并且这些位点有助于该性状未被充分开发的广义遗传力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Three Loci Affecting Variance of Body Mass Index in African Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans

Three Loci Affecting Variance of Body Mass Index in African Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans

Conventional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are designed to assess the effect of a genetic locus on phenotypic mean by genotype. Such loci explain a proportion of phenotypic variance known as narrow-sense heritability. In contrast, variance quantitative trait loci (vQTL) are associated with the phenotypic variance by genotype. These loci explain an additional proportion of phenotypic variance and contribute to broad-sense heritability but not to narrow-sense heritability. Here, a genome-wide vQTL analysis in 22,805 African Americans yielded eight loci for body mass index (BMI). Of these loci, three were replicated in 6002 sub-Saharan Africans. No locus reached genome-wide significance using the standard additive model. Furthermore, no locus showed evidence for natural selection, haplotype effects, or gene × sex or gene × study interactions. Two loci showed evidence for an effect of locus-specific ancestry resulting from admixture and for a gene × gene interaction. One locus showed evidence for interaction with diastolic blood pressure, consistent with this vQTL capturing an unmodeled gene × covariate interaction. These analyses demonstrate that relevant BMI loci can be detected by evaluating vQTL and that these loci contribute to the underexplored broad-sense heritability for this trait.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetic Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations. Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信