Laura Alexandra Moura Gomes, Adriano Miguel Gomes Costa, Stephane Marc Richard Steurbaut, Helder Dias Mota Filipe, Silvana Nair Leite, Filipa da Palma Carlos Alves da Costa Azevedo e Silva
{"title":"探讨全球临床药学实践趋势的质性研究","authors":"Laura Alexandra Moura Gomes, Adriano Miguel Gomes Costa, Stephane Marc Richard Steurbaut, Helder Dias Mota Filipe, Silvana Nair Leite, Filipa da Palma Carlos Alves da Costa Azevedo e Silva","doi":"10.1111/jep.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacists' clinical responsibilities have been on a progressive rise, adopting a more person-centered approach, and experiencing increased involvement in healthcare teams across all settings. The development and evolution of clinical pharmacy practice in each country depends on the existing facilitators and barriers, which are variable and highly context-related.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the perspectives of global experts regarding the advancement of clinical pharmacy practice, with a specific focus on examining the factors contributing to success and their outlook on the future of clinical pharmacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with academia and practice experts from 13 countries. Each expert was asked what they considered to be the future of clinical pharmacy education and practice, as well as what should be improved in the clinical pharmacy learning path to ensure that it keeps pace with the evolution of pharmacists' clinical responsibilities in practice. Success factors for change in clinical pharmacy practice were also explored. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Success factors for advancing clinical pharmacy practice included elements related to the healthcare and political landscape, such as remuneration, leadership, as well as willingness and readiness for change. Other success factors identified are directly related to the pharmacist, such as the use of reflective practice or the pharmacist's motivation.</p>\n \n <p>Perceived future directions include the existence of a multidisciplinary approach in practice, the expansion of clinical pharmacy services, as well as the delivery of clinical pharmacy services at the primary care level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The development of clinical pharmacy practice relies on a wide range of factors. The analysis carried out in this study of the success factors as well as the potential future directions of clinical pharmacy can serve as catalysts for the development of this pharmacy field at the country, regional, and global levels.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Study to Explore Global Trends in Clinical Pharmacy Practice\",\"authors\":\"Laura Alexandra Moura Gomes, Adriano Miguel Gomes Costa, Stephane Marc Richard Steurbaut, Helder Dias Mota Filipe, Silvana Nair Leite, Filipa da Palma Carlos Alves da Costa Azevedo e Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pharmacists' clinical responsibilities have been on a progressive rise, adopting a more person-centered approach, and experiencing increased involvement in healthcare teams across all settings. The development and evolution of clinical pharmacy practice in each country depends on the existing facilitators and barriers, which are variable and highly context-related.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the perspectives of global experts regarding the advancement of clinical pharmacy practice, with a specific focus on examining the factors contributing to success and their outlook on the future of clinical pharmacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with academia and practice experts from 13 countries. Each expert was asked what they considered to be the future of clinical pharmacy education and practice, as well as what should be improved in the clinical pharmacy learning path to ensure that it keeps pace with the evolution of pharmacists' clinical responsibilities in practice. Success factors for change in clinical pharmacy practice were also explored. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Success factors for advancing clinical pharmacy practice included elements related to the healthcare and political landscape, such as remuneration, leadership, as well as willingness and readiness for change. Other success factors identified are directly related to the pharmacist, such as the use of reflective practice or the pharmacist's motivation.</p>\\n \\n <p>Perceived future directions include the existence of a multidisciplinary approach in practice, the expansion of clinical pharmacy services, as well as the delivery of clinical pharmacy services at the primary care level.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The development of clinical pharmacy practice relies on a wide range of factors. The analysis carried out in this study of the success factors as well as the potential future directions of clinical pharmacy can serve as catalysts for the development of this pharmacy field at the country, regional, and global levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70104\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Qualitative Study to Explore Global Trends in Clinical Pharmacy Practice
Rationale
Pharmacists' clinical responsibilities have been on a progressive rise, adopting a more person-centered approach, and experiencing increased involvement in healthcare teams across all settings. The development and evolution of clinical pharmacy practice in each country depends on the existing facilitators and barriers, which are variable and highly context-related.
Aims and Objectives
To investigate the perspectives of global experts regarding the advancement of clinical pharmacy practice, with a specific focus on examining the factors contributing to success and their outlook on the future of clinical pharmacy.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with academia and practice experts from 13 countries. Each expert was asked what they considered to be the future of clinical pharmacy education and practice, as well as what should be improved in the clinical pharmacy learning path to ensure that it keeps pace with the evolution of pharmacists' clinical responsibilities in practice. Success factors for change in clinical pharmacy practice were also explored. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically.
Results
Success factors for advancing clinical pharmacy practice included elements related to the healthcare and political landscape, such as remuneration, leadership, as well as willingness and readiness for change. Other success factors identified are directly related to the pharmacist, such as the use of reflective practice or the pharmacist's motivation.
Perceived future directions include the existence of a multidisciplinary approach in practice, the expansion of clinical pharmacy services, as well as the delivery of clinical pharmacy services at the primary care level.
Conclusion
The development of clinical pharmacy practice relies on a wide range of factors. The analysis carried out in this study of the success factors as well as the potential future directions of clinical pharmacy can serve as catalysts for the development of this pharmacy field at the country, regional, and global levels.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.