地理距离、文化距离和政治风险对日本企业的海外并购是否同样重要?公司和交易层面的实证分析

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Yanwen Jiang, Mikiharu Noma
{"title":"地理距离、文化距离和政治风险对日本企业的海外并购是否同样重要?公司和交易层面的实证分析","authors":"Yanwen Jiang,&nbsp;Mikiharu Noma","doi":"10.1111/apel.12423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several studies on cultural clusters classify Japan as independent, meaning that wherever Japanese firms go abroad, they must adapt to very different environments. This study examines how Japanese firms treat deterrent effects of geographic distance, cultural distance, and political hazards and whether the deterrent effects may vary with firm size, firm age, and ownership solution. Results using data on Japanese firms' outbound mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) from 2010 to 2019 reveal that (1) only the deterrent effect of geographic distance is absolute. (2) Larger firms with larger slack resources in their home country are less concerned about geographic distances and political hazards. (3) Older firms, exposed to typical practices and norms for a long time, are less adaptable to cultural distances. (4) The deterrent effect of geographic distance is weaker for complete control mode on the one hand, on the other hand, the moderating effect of complete control mode on political hazards hinges on firm size and age due to trade-offs between integration benefits and resource/experience constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":44776,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature","volume":"39 1","pages":"3-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do geographic distance, cultural distance, and political hazards equally matter for Japanese firms' outbound mergers and acquisitions? A firm- and deal-level empirical analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yanwen Jiang,&nbsp;Mikiharu Noma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apel.12423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Several studies on cultural clusters classify Japan as independent, meaning that wherever Japanese firms go abroad, they must adapt to very different environments. This study examines how Japanese firms treat deterrent effects of geographic distance, cultural distance, and political hazards and whether the deterrent effects may vary with firm size, firm age, and ownership solution. Results using data on Japanese firms' outbound mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) from 2010 to 2019 reveal that (1) only the deterrent effect of geographic distance is absolute. (2) Larger firms with larger slack resources in their home country are less concerned about geographic distances and political hazards. (3) Older firms, exposed to typical practices and norms for a long time, are less adaptable to cultural distances. (4) The deterrent effect of geographic distance is weaker for complete control mode on the one hand, on the other hand, the moderating effect of complete control mode on political hazards hinges on firm size and age due to trade-offs between integration benefits and resource/experience constraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"3-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apel.12423\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apel.12423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些关于文化集群的研究将日本归类为独立的,这意味着无论日本企业走到哪里,它们都必须适应非常不同的环境。本研究考察了日本企业如何对待地理距离、文化距离和政治风险的威慑效应,以及威慑效应是否会随着企业规模、企业年龄和所有权解决方案而变化。利用2010 - 2019年日本企业对外并购(M&;A)数据的研究结果表明:(1)只有地理距离的威慑作用是绝对的。(2)国内闲置资源较多的大型企业对地理距离和政治风险的关注程度较低。(3)较老的企业,由于长期接触典型的做法和规范,对文化距离的适应能力较差。(4)完全控制模式对地理距离的威慑作用较弱,而完全控制模式对政治风险的调节作用取决于企业规模和企业年龄,这是由于整合效益和资源/经验约束之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do geographic distance, cultural distance, and political hazards equally matter for Japanese firms' outbound mergers and acquisitions? A firm- and deal-level empirical analysis

Several studies on cultural clusters classify Japan as independent, meaning that wherever Japanese firms go abroad, they must adapt to very different environments. This study examines how Japanese firms treat deterrent effects of geographic distance, cultural distance, and political hazards and whether the deterrent effects may vary with firm size, firm age, and ownership solution. Results using data on Japanese firms' outbound mergers and acquisitions (M&A) from 2010 to 2019 reveal that (1) only the deterrent effect of geographic distance is absolute. (2) Larger firms with larger slack resources in their home country are less concerned about geographic distances and political hazards. (3) Older firms, exposed to typical practices and norms for a long time, are less adaptable to cultural distances. (4) The deterrent effect of geographic distance is weaker for complete control mode on the one hand, on the other hand, the moderating effect of complete control mode on political hazards hinges on firm size and age due to trade-offs between integration benefits and resource/experience constraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Asian-Pacific Economic Literature (APEL) is an essential resource for anyone interested in economic development in the Asian-Pacific region. With original articles on topical policy issues, literature surveys, and abstracts of articles from over 300 journals, APEL makes it easy for you to keep ahead of the proliferating research on this dynamic and increasingly important region. Read by politicians, journalists, businesspeople, policy-makers, industrialists and academics, APEL avoids technical jargon, and is the only journal devoted to one-stop, in-depth reporting of research on the development of Asian-Pacific economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信