经济自由与总统选举:贝叶斯空间概率分层建模方法

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Donald J. Lacombe, Timothy Shaughnessy
{"title":"经济自由与总统选举:贝叶斯空间概率分层建模方法","authors":"Donald J. Lacombe,&nbsp;Timothy Shaughnessy","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is a growing consensus that spatial effects can help to explain electoral outcomes. Additionally, the concept of economic freedom is also correlated with many different economic outcomes. This paper combines these two ideas using a Bayesian hierarchical spatial probit econometric model. Hierarchical models have a long history in the Bayesian literature and allow for the estimation of Level 1 (county) and Level 2 (state) variables. In this study, we use county-level data on county-level votes for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election and control for state-level economic freedom using a newly developed Bayesian hierarchical spatial probit model. The results indicate that state-level economic freedom contributed positively to Donald Trump's vote at the county level.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 3","pages":"497-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Freedom and Presidential Elections: A Bayesian Spatial Probit Hierarchical Modeling Approach\",\"authors\":\"Donald J. Lacombe,&nbsp;Timothy Shaughnessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajes.12616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>There is a growing consensus that spatial effects can help to explain electoral outcomes. Additionally, the concept of economic freedom is also correlated with many different economic outcomes. This paper combines these two ideas using a Bayesian hierarchical spatial probit econometric model. Hierarchical models have a long history in the Bayesian literature and allow for the estimation of Level 1 (county) and Level 2 (state) variables. In this study, we use county-level data on county-level votes for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election and control for state-level economic freedom using a newly developed Bayesian hierarchical spatial probit model. The results indicate that state-level economic freedom contributed positively to Donald Trump's vote at the county level.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"497-502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人认为,空间效应有助于解释选举结果。此外,经济自由的概念也与许多不同的经济结果相关。本文使用贝叶斯层次空间概率计量模型将这两种思想结合起来。层次模型在贝叶斯文献中有很长的历史,并且允许对一级(县)和二级(州)变量进行估计。在本研究中,我们使用了2020年总统大选中唐纳德·特朗普的县级选票数据,并使用了新开发的贝叶斯分层空间概率模型来控制州级经济自由。结果表明,州一级的经济自由对唐纳德·特朗普在县一级的投票有积极的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Freedom and Presidential Elections: A Bayesian Spatial Probit Hierarchical Modeling Approach

There is a growing consensus that spatial effects can help to explain electoral outcomes. Additionally, the concept of economic freedom is also correlated with many different economic outcomes. This paper combines these two ideas using a Bayesian hierarchical spatial probit econometric model. Hierarchical models have a long history in the Bayesian literature and allow for the estimation of Level 1 (county) and Level 2 (state) variables. In this study, we use county-level data on county-level votes for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election and control for state-level economic freedom using a newly developed Bayesian hierarchical spatial probit model. The results indicate that state-level economic freedom contributed positively to Donald Trump's vote at the county level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信