Ding Xiong, Xin Zhong, Yunying Yu, Renjie Guo, Zili Wang
{"title":"“一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络特征及其对创新能力的影响","authors":"Ding Xiong, Xin Zhong, Yunying Yu, Renjie Guo, Zili Wang","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The construction of a closely connected trade network of countries along the Belt and Road (BR) is a key part of deepening regional economic cooperation. Based on the trade data of goods and services of the countries along the Belt and Road from 2007 to 2021, the research applies social network analysis to construct the goods and services network and analyze its evolution, characteristics, and impact on innovation activities. The study finds that: (1) The average trade distance in the trade network is gradually decreasing; the trade network is characterized by a clear “grouping” of countries, with the group of Southeast Asian countries being the most closely linked and the European countries being more efficient in terms of the effective scale and efficiency of their trade. (2) The centrality and effective scale of the trade network significantly promote innovation activities. The moderating effect suggests that the trade network more strongly promotes developing countries with lower levels of national institutional environment and informatization, while the level of corporate disclosure and technological spillovers play a positive moderating role. Heterogeneity analysis shows that countries in Asia and those with high levels of sentiment toward China are more likely to benefit from the innovation promotion effect, while countries with high levels of intellectual property protection may inhibit the development of innovation capacity. The findings of this research provide useful policy insights for exploring new paths to promote innovation activities in countries along the Belt and Road from the perspective of trade networks.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 3","pages":"567-583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Trade Networks in Countries Along the Belt and Road and Their Impact on Innovation Capacity\",\"authors\":\"Ding Xiong, Xin Zhong, Yunying Yu, Renjie Guo, Zili Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajes.12621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The construction of a closely connected trade network of countries along the Belt and Road (BR) is a key part of deepening regional economic cooperation. Based on the trade data of goods and services of the countries along the Belt and Road from 2007 to 2021, the research applies social network analysis to construct the goods and services network and analyze its evolution, characteristics, and impact on innovation activities. The study finds that: (1) The average trade distance in the trade network is gradually decreasing; the trade network is characterized by a clear “grouping” of countries, with the group of Southeast Asian countries being the most closely linked and the European countries being more efficient in terms of the effective scale and efficiency of their trade. (2) The centrality and effective scale of the trade network significantly promote innovation activities. The moderating effect suggests that the trade network more strongly promotes developing countries with lower levels of national institutional environment and informatization, while the level of corporate disclosure and technological spillovers play a positive moderating role. Heterogeneity analysis shows that countries in Asia and those with high levels of sentiment toward China are more likely to benefit from the innovation promotion effect, while countries with high levels of intellectual property protection may inhibit the development of innovation capacity. The findings of this research provide useful policy insights for exploring new paths to promote innovation activities in countries along the Belt and Road from the perspective of trade networks.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"567-583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Economics and Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12621\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics of Trade Networks in Countries Along the Belt and Road and Their Impact on Innovation Capacity
The construction of a closely connected trade network of countries along the Belt and Road (BR) is a key part of deepening regional economic cooperation. Based on the trade data of goods and services of the countries along the Belt and Road from 2007 to 2021, the research applies social network analysis to construct the goods and services network and analyze its evolution, characteristics, and impact on innovation activities. The study finds that: (1) The average trade distance in the trade network is gradually decreasing; the trade network is characterized by a clear “grouping” of countries, with the group of Southeast Asian countries being the most closely linked and the European countries being more efficient in terms of the effective scale and efficiency of their trade. (2) The centrality and effective scale of the trade network significantly promote innovation activities. The moderating effect suggests that the trade network more strongly promotes developing countries with lower levels of national institutional environment and informatization, while the level of corporate disclosure and technological spillovers play a positive moderating role. Heterogeneity analysis shows that countries in Asia and those with high levels of sentiment toward China are more likely to benefit from the innovation promotion effect, while countries with high levels of intellectual property protection may inhibit the development of innovation capacity. The findings of this research provide useful policy insights for exploring new paths to promote innovation activities in countries along the Belt and Road from the perspective of trade networks.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.